Dracula Reborn

This movie is a kill fest and if that is all you want to see well then have at it sports fans! The vampire truly loves to kill and is having fun doing it. He acts silly before the kill and ravishes his prey. This is the problem, because once you have seen the first three kills you might as well skip to the end because all the rest are the same. Not one player ever has a plan to survive or any hope to kill a vampire. It is all about just getting bit in the neck and sucked dry without ever seeing it coming or putting up any resistance. The lead female star looked like real live vampire and could stand to put one a few pounds. I don't know how she got the part unless she was the directors girl friend. The only other thing is that the vampire didn't seem to have any of the usual vulnerabilities, not even sun light and this was disappointing because the characters never seem to have a snowball in hell of not being killed.

This is actually the worst film I have ever seen. 24 mins in, boring, waited till 48 mins still nothing but bad acting and terrible cinematography. Fast forwarded to 1hr 20 no better. Just a really bad impersonation of a vampire dry humping unassuming victims. The read up and cover looked OK so for a few quid thought I try it. I don't think these poor actors will ever work again after this. I don't think the syfy Chanel would even air this nonsense. I have thrown mine in the bin but actually feel like sending back to Attila 'whats his name' (writer and director) for a full refund for clearly lying about the content and the hash job he calls a film..... Utter utter garbage.

Ok, trying to be objective - in all fairness it's not The Worst movie I've seen, but it's pretty bad. It is boring and unless you force yourself, you're going to have to fast forward through most of it. And if you do, you won't miss anything because it barely makes any sense, and it's super disjointed. It maybe could have been funny because it was so bad- the acting was bad, the script was bad...but it didn't seem like it was trying to be funny. It seemed like it was made by super newbies who were trying pretty hard. But it's just ridiculous.

Some Canadian journalists travel to Paris and Transylvania to investigate Dracula. Or something. I became bored very quickly with this. Silly plot. Wooden acting. And a bald headed, cape wearing vampire, skulking around (immune to daylight), not sure if he's meant to be scary or funny. But he's neither. At 98 minutes this was a real tester. The only reason that I'm awarding 2 and not 1 out of 10 is that I liked the European locations. Credit for that at least. Bram Stoker must be turning in his grave with crap like this bearing Dracula's name!

This is easily the worst vampire film I have ever seen and I have watched some absolute stinkers. It is amateurish in every way, badly shot, lit and acted. The performances are so bad I actually thought it was a parody, apart from the fact that it wasn't even in the "so bad, it's funny" category. I bought the film and was really looking forward to watching it based on the cover blurb. I started watching it, then started watching it on fast forward waiting for something to happen, then realised it was over and that nothing had! The only time I have ever been more disappointed with a film was when I paid good money to see Jaws:The Revenge at the cinema. After watching Dracula Reborn, (an obvious attempt to cash in on Dracula Untold), the DVD was consigned to the local charity shop. Avoid this one like the plague!