Bloodhound

2 minus that is.... its no more than a layman with a hd-cam drone production. very primitive and lousy soundwork.couldve been great if made in the early 1970's.

no recommend from the grumpy ol man

The more I watched this mess the less coherent and believable. And then I discovered that it is not even listed among movies. It has got to be some very sick person's joke and it isn't funny or worth 1 minute!

There were actually a very few good points about "Bloodhound", chiefly, its running time. I've seen worse films, though. ("Midsommer, etc). The acting in this movie sucked major balls. The cinematography was horrendous. The dialog was insipid and ridiculous. And the synth-heavy background muzak was beyond unbearable. I can't argue about the pace, though. At 70 minutes, it was fairly brisk, so that's a plus. In any case, this film was VERY bad, so avoid at all costs.

So bad took everything I had to stay awake. It was like it was filmed in the pandemic with no crew. Camera work is bad acting is bad don't waste your time less you need to get some sleep

Abel Walker and his cameraman, Jim are on the hunt for a missing woman. As the plot thickens they find more than twists, and turns. They get mixed up in a game of murder.

While the plot sounds straightforward, the film is anything but. Writer/Director Jason R Miller has created a unique mix of neo-noir and thriller packed into this gritty little film that takes to the streets of Los Angeles and shows the darker side off like few films could.

The docu-style technique makes the audience feel like we are a part of Abel Walker's investigation. Ed Ackerman's performance as Abel Walker really gets us invested in this who-done-it story.

Another element I enjoyed is the film's slick '80s style synth score. It completes the mood of this unique film.