IMDb रेटिंग
4.4/10
2.8 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
फ्लाइट 42 के बाद एक तूफान के माध्यम से यात्रा करता है, वे खुद को फ्रांस, 1940 में पाते हैं।फ्लाइट 42 के बाद एक तूफान के माध्यम से यात्रा करता है, वे खुद को फ्रांस, 1940 में पाते हैं।फ्लाइट 42 के बाद एक तूफान के माध्यम से यात्रा करता है, वे खुद को फ्रांस, 1940 में पाते हैं।
Angie Téodora Dick
- Briana
- (as Angie Dick)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
It was a low budget movie with loads of goofs and factual rubbish but, nonetheless I did enjoy it. If anyone has ever seen The Final Countdown (1980), the plot is very similar to that but in an aeroplane, not a battleship.
Nice final scene too. Made my spine tingle a little bit !
Nice final scene too. Made my spine tingle a little bit !
Why all the negative reviews based upon the lack of factual accuracy in this movie? Did Hello Dolly really sing along with Walter Matthau, or how about 'Don't call me Shirley . . .' What's 'wrong' with ridiculous when it comes to totally fictional movies whose sole purpose is to entertain and not inform. The Kirk Douglas movie had a big budget and was meant to be taken a little more seriously, but if time travel is a fact then I missed it in physics class :) Point is, if you base an entire movie on what is currently a totally fictional premise why do you need to get other scientific 'facts' straight before the movie can be enjoyable. How many movies are based on the Zombie Loonies Threaten The Earth? Have you seen many real zombies kicking around the streets lately - and no, I'm not talking about politicians so you can't count them okay:) It was obvious that the director was on a restricted budget (it is a B movie after all) and wasn't going for realism, rather he made an entertaining somewhat tongue-in-cheek movie. Not the best acting in the world, not the best of anything, but like so many other movies it was a decent entertaining watch none the less. I didn't consider my time wasted at all but then I like Sci-Fi anything and especially time travel movies even if they are, or sometimes especially if they are in the B movie class. 5 stars from me.
Full disclosure. I like airplanes going back in time, ie 'The odyssey of Flight 33.'
Well done for low, low budget.
No spoilers here. It deserves some praise.
This was a great Sunday Afternoon movie which is exactly When I viewed it. This
review is for the arm chair writers and directors that couldn't write their 5th
grade essay on what i did on my summer vacation . So what some of the facts
were off. No one's life was in danger.It's all make believe for entertainment
Why do we find so much fault. I didn't understand the last part when the old
man showed the pilot his journal on the events I agree it could have been better ,,,,But BEN HUR could have been better also . I think the Actors in this film were well cast and the FX WAS good for a (B) grade film .
review is for the arm chair writers and directors that couldn't write their 5th
grade essay on what i did on my summer vacation . So what some of the facts
were off. No one's life was in danger.It's all make believe for entertainment
Why do we find so much fault. I didn't understand the last part when the old
man showed the pilot his journal on the events I agree it could have been better ,,,,But BEN HUR could have been better also . I think the Actors in this film were well cast and the FX WAS good for a (B) grade film .
The viewer will assume this is a time travel film, if only because the characters believe they have traveled in time, back to 1940. From the beginning, however, they are confronted with events that are apparently out of kilter, such as Dunkirk being a disaster rather than an inspirational evacuation, or Nazi jets, or Allied SAM weaponry, or the lack of British radar research, or...well, you get the idea--something is wrong, something even the professional historians aboard the airliner don't understand, and never really get. There is a temptation to dismiss the film as just a remake of The Final Countdown, but it goes past it in terms of theme, edging into more complexity, touching upon the idea of Intelligent Design, divine intervention, and the fluidity of time. Had the script actually addressed the issues directly rather than touching upon them tangentially, and also managed to remain above a certain level of pulpy mawkishness, the film would have been better. It might also then have risen above the mediocre acting. But the script writers did not, the director did not, and so we have a film that is highly entertaining and diverting, but is hardly challenging.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe Boeing 757 had a maximum speed of 659mph, a maximum range of 3900 NML, and a maximum ceiling of 42,000 ft compared to the Me 262's Maximum speed of 560 mph, Maximum range of 650 miles, and a maximum ceiling of 37,570 ft. The 757 could have easily pulled and climbed away from the Me 262
- गूफ़The German Me 262 jet used an MK 108 cannon that fired 30×90RB mm projectiles, sometimes explosive. When co-pilot is shot, his wound is typical of a gunshot wound. In reality, a person shot by such a high caliber shell would likely be nearly torn in half and die instantly.
- भाव
Cameron Hicks: What are you working on?
Older Nigel: When you get my age you have to keep on top of things
- कनेक्शनReferences Quantum Leap (1989)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Flight World War II?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Flight 1942
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 25 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.78 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें