एक परेशान सुरक्षा गार्ड फ्रेडी फ़ैज़बियर पिज़्ज़ा में रात की नौकरी करता है, लेकिन उसे पता चलता है कि एनिमेट्रोनिक शुभंकर मृत बच्चों की आत्माओं के वश में हैं. उसे पिज़्ज़ेरिया में बिना मारे प... सभी पढ़ेंएक परेशान सुरक्षा गार्ड फ्रेडी फ़ैज़बियर पिज़्ज़ा में रात की नौकरी करता है, लेकिन उसे पता चलता है कि एनिमेट्रोनिक शुभंकर मृत बच्चों की आत्माओं के वश में हैं. उसे पिज़्ज़ेरिया में बिना मारे पाँच रातें जीवित रहना होगा.एक परेशान सुरक्षा गार्ड फ्रेडी फ़ैज़बियर पिज़्ज़ा में रात की नौकरी करता है, लेकिन उसे पता चलता है कि एनिमेट्रोनिक शुभंकर मृत बच्चों की आत्माओं के वश में हैं. उसे पिज़्ज़ेरिया में बिना मारे पाँच रातें जीवित रहना होगा.
- पुरस्कार
- 24 कुल नामांकन
सारांश
Reviewers say 'Five Nights at Freddy's' elicits mixed reactions, highlighting nostalgia and fan service. Practical effects and animatronic designs are lauded for their faithfulness to the game. However, the plot is criticized for being confusing and disjointed, failing to deliver expected horror and jump scares. Characters are seen as underdeveloped with poor dialogue, and inconsistent performances. Pacing issues cause the film to drag, yet some appreciate the atmosphere and set design, making it enjoyable for fans despite its flaws.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Just saw Five Nights at Freddy's. That.... was a hot mess. Let's talk about positives first. The Jim Henson Shop out did themselves bringing Freddy and friends to life. They did primarily practical effects and it shows, the animatronics being the best part of the film. Another positive is the music, which was outstanding!
Unfortunately, that's where my positives stop. This film has two major problems. First, it's PG13. This movie would have benefitted greatly from an R rating, it was tamer than the games. Second, the film can't decide if it is for fans or newcomers. The actual FNAF storyline is largely secondary to the plot of the lead character trying to discover who kidnapped his brother as a child. It's annoying, because when it's not being FNAF, it's just boring. (Also maybe it's the direction given, but the leads were pretty bland). They try to do a mystery thing with the FNAF storyline that doesn't work if you know the games. Matthew Lillard was perfectly cast, but woefully underused (He's in maybe 15min of the movie). Overall, I have to give FNAF the movie a C-. If you want a good version of Five Nights in film, stick with Willy's Wonderland, it's much better.
Unfortunately, that's where my positives stop. This film has two major problems. First, it's PG13. This movie would have benefitted greatly from an R rating, it was tamer than the games. Second, the film can't decide if it is for fans or newcomers. The actual FNAF storyline is largely secondary to the plot of the lead character trying to discover who kidnapped his brother as a child. It's annoying, because when it's not being FNAF, it's just boring. (Also maybe it's the direction given, but the leads were pretty bland). They try to do a mystery thing with the FNAF storyline that doesn't work if you know the games. Matthew Lillard was perfectly cast, but woefully underused (He's in maybe 15min of the movie). Overall, I have to give FNAF the movie a C-. If you want a good version of Five Nights in film, stick with Willy's Wonderland, it's much better.
"Five Nights at Freddy's" is a film that seems to stay faithful to the games, especially in its portrayal of the creepy animatronic characters that capture the eerie spirit of the game's characters. Despite the film not being as bad as some critics suggest, it falls short of being truly impressive. It can be described as a generic, light production that manages to entertain until the end.
On the downside, the film is quite moderate in terms of violence and scares. The scares it does offer are mostly predictable and lack the ability to truly terrify, relying on dated techniques. Furthermore, the lack of violence makes it feel somewhat juvenile. The characters in the film come across as somewhat caricatured and unrealistic, particularly the human villains who seem like they're straight out of a 90s teen comedy. The direction also falls short, leaving "Five Nights at Freddy's" lacking a distinct identity and failing to cater to both the child and adult audience.
On the downside, the film is quite moderate in terms of violence and scares. The scares it does offer are mostly predictable and lack the ability to truly terrify, relying on dated techniques. Furthermore, the lack of violence makes it feel somewhat juvenile. The characters in the film come across as somewhat caricatured and unrealistic, particularly the human villains who seem like they're straight out of a 90s teen comedy. The direction also falls short, leaving "Five Nights at Freddy's" lacking a distinct identity and failing to cater to both the child and adult audience.
A security guard gets a job, and suddenly realises he's going to have an incredibly challenging and difficult night.
I genuinely and desperately wanted to love this film, the trailers looked so cool, and despite not being a gamer, I knew of the game.
Now, if I were judging this solely on the visuals, I'd be giving it a mammoth score, and healing praise onto it, it does look fantastic, and as for the 'locals,' they look so cool, the special effects are great, genuinely a smashing looking film, one that my fifteen year old self would have loved.
Now, the important bit, the translation from game to film, I really wish I could say it worked brilliantly, I'm not sure, I think there's something missing, does the story work? Sadly I'd have to argue that I don't think it does.
I think younger teens will genuinely enjoy this movie, for horror lovers like myself, it may be lacking a bit of bite, similar to M3GAN, very watchable, just a little tame.
6/10.
I genuinely and desperately wanted to love this film, the trailers looked so cool, and despite not being a gamer, I knew of the game.
Now, if I were judging this solely on the visuals, I'd be giving it a mammoth score, and healing praise onto it, it does look fantastic, and as for the 'locals,' they look so cool, the special effects are great, genuinely a smashing looking film, one that my fifteen year old self would have loved.
Now, the important bit, the translation from game to film, I really wish I could say it worked brilliantly, I'm not sure, I think there's something missing, does the story work? Sadly I'd have to argue that I don't think it does.
I think younger teens will genuinely enjoy this movie, for horror lovers like myself, it may be lacking a bit of bite, similar to M3GAN, very watchable, just a little tame.
6/10.
I found the concept to be a bit cartoonish, so I was expecting it to be more fun. The story had a slow start, and the main character's easily startled, and his constant jumpiness gets old pretty quick. Surprisingly, there weren't many jump scares, and it felt like a slasher movie without the slashing. They shied away from showing the gruesome stuff, opting for screams, shadows, and implied horrors. It's a little bit slow paced, thought it was a slow burn buildup but it doesn't get to the highs. It feels like it drags slightly.
While the premise was interesting, it seemed like they focused solely on the plot, neglecting the fun and scariness. The concept was fresh, but it lacked imagination in the end. The whole "kidnapped little brother" storyline felt like an excuse for allowing his sister to interact with the robots, even though it was illogical given how much he cared for her. Hard to believe he wanted to find his brother so much he's willing to 'sacrifice' his sister. This inconsistency was hard to overlook.
The film wasn't particularly thrilling, but I I did like how the aunt got got, even though it wasn't shown explicitly. The introduction of the yellow rabbit was genuinely scary, how he walked out, but once he started talking he wasn't so frightening anymore..
Anyway, it's a little generic, not as fun nor creepy as it could've been; not too much to get you interested in the characters even though they did have some depth. Ultimately, a pretty mediocre and forgettable film.
While the premise was interesting, it seemed like they focused solely on the plot, neglecting the fun and scariness. The concept was fresh, but it lacked imagination in the end. The whole "kidnapped little brother" storyline felt like an excuse for allowing his sister to interact with the robots, even though it was illogical given how much he cared for her. Hard to believe he wanted to find his brother so much he's willing to 'sacrifice' his sister. This inconsistency was hard to overlook.
The film wasn't particularly thrilling, but I I did like how the aunt got got, even though it wasn't shown explicitly. The introduction of the yellow rabbit was genuinely scary, how he walked out, but once he started talking he wasn't so frightening anymore..
Anyway, it's a little generic, not as fun nor creepy as it could've been; not too much to get you interested in the characters even though they did have some depth. Ultimately, a pretty mediocre and forgettable film.
Five Night at Freddy's was a pretty big letdown. I went in with the expectation to have a pretty scary fun time. Instead what I got was a boring cliche riddled film. Right from the start you can tell this film was geared toward the younger audience. We really don't get much scenes with Freddy and his friends even though they are supposed to be the main attraction here. There is to much setup to the story which is not interesting at all and not enough kills/thrills. Maybe under a different Director or writer this could have turned out to be a more enjoyable experience. Five Night at Freddy's gets a 4 low stars out of 10 from me.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाBecause of Foxy's skeletal-like structure, he was built as a full-body animatronic puppet and performed by Russ Walko, along with a group of puppeteers from Jim Henson's Creature Shop. In shots where Foxy walked, it took as many as six puppeteers to accomplish his full range of movements.
- गूफ़Late in the movie, Vanessa is shown in front of Freddy Fazbear's Pizza. Mike's car is not in the parking lot. When she later pulls up with Mike, it's there.
- भाव
Sparky's Diner Waiter: Some people say that but, it's just a theory.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटAt the end credits, garbled audio can be heard of something spelling out the phrase, "Come Find Me."
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Kahoot Settimanali: Ne sai di FNAF? (2023)
- साउंडट्रैकTalking in Your Sleep
Written by Coz Canler (as George Canler), Jimmy Marinos, Mike Skill, Peter Solley and Wally Palmar (as Wally Palamarchuk)
Performed by The Romantics
Courtesy of KTel Records
By arrangement with Sony Music Publishing
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Five Nights at Freddy's?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Five Nights at Freddy's: La Película
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $2,00,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $13,72,75,620
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $8,00,01,720
- 29 अक्टू॰ 2023
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $29,14,93,620
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 49 मि(109 min)
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.00 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें