[go: up one dir, main page]

    कैलेंडर रिलीज़ करेंसबसे बढ़िया 250 फ़िल्मेंसर्वाधिक लोकप्रिय फ़िल्मेंज़ोनर के आधार पर फ़िल्में ब्राउज़ करेंटॉप बॉक्स ऑफ़िसशो का समय और टिकटफ़िल्मों से जुड़ी खबरेंइंडिया मूवी स्पॉटलाइट
    टीवी और स्ट्रीमिंग पर क्या हैसबसे बढ़िया 250 टीवी शोसबसे लोकप्रिय टीवी शोशैली के अनुसार टीवी शो ब्राउज़ करेंटीवी न्यूज़
    देखने के लिए क्या हैनए ट्रेलरIMDb ओरिजिनलIMDb की पसंदIMDb स्पॉटलाइटFamily Entertainment GuideIMDb पॉडकास्ट
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter पुरस्कारअवार्ड्स सेंट्रलफ़ेस्टिवल सेंट्रलसभी इवेंट
    जिनका आज जन्म हुआसबसे लोकप्रिय सेलिब्रिटीसेलिब्रिटी से जुड़ी खबरें
    सहायता केंद्रकंट्रीब्यूटर ज़ोनपॉल
उद्योग पेशेवरों के लिए
  • भाषा
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
वॉचलिस्ट
साइन इन करें
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
ऐप का इस्तेमाल करें
  • कास्ट और क्रू
  • उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं
  • ट्रिविया
  • अक्सर पूछे जाने वाला सवाल
IMDbPro

Ouija: Origin of Evil

  • 2016
  • A
  • 1 घं 39 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
6.2/10
79 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
लोकप्रियता
3,262
552
Lulu Wilson in Ouija: Origin of Evil (2016)
In 1967 Los Angeles, a widowed mother and her two daughters add a new stunt to bolster their seance scam business and unwittingly invite authentic evil into their home. When the youngest daughter is overtaken by a merciless spirit, the family confronts unthinkable fears to save her and send her possessor back to the other side.
trailer प्ले करें2:36
34 वीडियो
99+ फ़ोटो
Psychological DramaSupernatural HorrorDramaHorrorMysteryThriller

1967 में लॉस एंजिल्स में, एक विधवा मां अपनी दो बेटियों के साथ अपने घिनौने घोटाले के कारोबार को बढ़ाने के लिए एक बुरी शक्ति को आमंत्रित करती है, हालांकि उन्हें आने वाले खतरे का पता नहीं होता.1967 में लॉस एंजिल्स में, एक विधवा मां अपनी दो बेटियों के साथ अपने घिनौने घोटाले के कारोबार को बढ़ाने के लिए एक बुरी शक्ति को आमंत्रित करती है, हालांकि उन्हें आने वाले खतरे का पता नहीं होता.1967 में लॉस एंजिल्स में, एक विधवा मां अपनी दो बेटियों के साथ अपने घिनौने घोटाले के कारोबार को बढ़ाने के लिए एक बुरी शक्ति को आमंत्रित करती है, हालांकि उन्हें आने वाले खतरे का पता नहीं होता.

  • निर्देशक
    • Mike Flanagan
  • लेखक
    • Mike Flanagan
    • Jeff Howard
    • Juliet Snowden
  • स्टार
    • Elizabeth Reaser
    • Lulu Wilson
    • Annalise Basso
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
  • IMDb रेटिंग
    6.2/10
    79 हज़ार
    आपकी रेटिंग
    लोकप्रियता
    3,262
    552
    • निर्देशक
      • Mike Flanagan
    • लेखक
      • Mike Flanagan
      • Jeff Howard
      • Juliet Snowden
    • स्टार
      • Elizabeth Reaser
      • Lulu Wilson
      • Annalise Basso
    • 287यूज़र समीक्षाएं
    • 201आलोचक समीक्षाएं
    • 65मेटास्कोर
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
    • पुरस्कार
      • 2 जीत और कुल 7 नामांकन

    वीडियो34

    Trailer #2
    Trailer 2:36
    Trailer #2
    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:34
    Official Trailer
    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:34
    Official Trailer
    How Doris Talks To Daddy
    Clip 0:49
    How Doris Talks To Daddy
    Take Her Voice Instead
    Clip 0:50
    Take Her Voice Instead
    Father Tom Explains His Theory
    Clip 1:02
    Father Tom Explains His Theory
    What Its Like To Be Strangled
    Clip 1:30
    What Its Like To Be Strangled

    फ़ोटो107

    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    + 102
    पोस्टर देखें

    टॉप कलाकार22

    बदलाव करें
    Elizabeth Reaser
    Elizabeth Reaser
    • Alice Zander
    Lulu Wilson
    Lulu Wilson
    • Doris Zander
    Annalise Basso
    Annalise Basso
    • Lina Zander
    Henry Thomas
    Henry Thomas
    • Father Tom
    Parker Mack
    Parker Mack
    • Mikey
    Halle Charlton
    Halle Charlton
    • Ellie
    Alexis G. Zall
    Alexis G. Zall
    • Betty
    Doug Jones
    Doug Jones
    • Ghoul Marcus
    Kate Siegel
    Kate Siegel
    • Jenny Browning
    Sam Anderson
    Sam Anderson
    • Mr. Browning
    Chelsea Gonzalez
    Chelsea Gonzalez
    • Gloria
    Lincoln Melcher
    Lincoln Melcher
    • Jack
    Nicholas Keenan
    Nicholas Keenan
    • Walter
    Michael Weaver
    Michael Weaver
    • Roger Zander
    Ele Keats
    Ele Keats
    • Ellie's Mom
    Eve Gordon
    Eve Gordon
    • Joan
    Chad Heffelfinger
    Chad Heffelfinger
    • Male Ghoul
    Nina Mansker
    • Female Ghoul
    • निर्देशक
      • Mike Flanagan
    • लेखक
      • Mike Flanagan
      • Jeff Howard
      • Juliet Snowden
    • सभी कास्ट और क्रू
    • IMDbPro में प्रोडक्शन, बॉक्स ऑफिस और बहुत कुछ

    उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं287

    6.279.3K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं

    6spencergrande6

    Better Than It Has Any Right To Be, But Still...

    Mike Flanagan just gets so close yet again, yet falls disappointingly short. Oculus is still his best work, and the promise that both Hush and this prequel to a PG-13 board game prequel show, is that if given the right opportunity he might really be capable of a cold-blooded classic.

    This is a film that shouldn't exist, should never have gotten theatrical distribution and definitely shouldn't have attracted the likes of Flanagan (okay, he probably did this to increase his clout in the industry, but still). He musters some great work here, following familiar supernatural clichés but bringing his own touch to the proceedings.

    The setting is beautiful, the characters likable and not completely square. The atmosphere is given time to build, he luxuriates in teasing and messing with audience expectations (as a way of spiting this, and goosing the audience lulled into a slow burn placation, he includes an explosive scene wherein the actual demon is seen shoving his fist down the little girl's throat. It's both too much and a necessary jolt at the time, a conundrum if ever there was one and a small encapsulation of everything right and wrong within this film).

    It's too bad some of the nice work done in the first 2/3rds of the film is undone by a clichéd, boring, exorcism-lite finale. None of it is very scary, and it all has the feel of fitting into the "Ouija" franchise package, whatever in God's name that could mean. Considering the stakes here, what Flanagan does is still impressive.
    7Matt_Layden

    This prequel has no business being as good as it is.

    This prequel has no business being as good as it is. The first Ouija film came out in 2014 and quickly faded away into obscurity. So imagine my surprise when they decide to make a 'prequel' of all things. I hunch is that The Conjuring films have been pretty successful and they are set in the 70's, when things were a little creepier, no cell phones and genuine scary aesthetic. Imagine my surprise again when up and coming horror filmmakers Mike Flanagan was the man behind the camera. The underrated mirror horror flick Oculus and deaf home invasion flick Hush were two of his recent outings. Things were looking not too bad for this flick and to top it off, it received some pretty decent reviews.

    Alice and her two daughters run a scam business in which they "speak to the dead". The mother justifies this business by telling her youngest daughter, Doris, that it helps people move on and get closure. When her eldest, Lina, plays the new Ouija boardgames at a friends house, she tells her mother to incorporate it into her act. She does and things take a sinister turn when they scam becomes reality.

    It's hard to make a game board scary. The first film tried, failed and this one tries and succeeds for the most part. Any non-horror fan might balk at the idea that this film is good, but I consider this movie to be one of the most underrated flicks of the year. Flanagan knows how to build solid tension and he doesn't rely on cheap scares or an obscene amount of gore. This film has none of that. Careful framework and lighting is all he needs to create an unsettling atmosphere. Whenever someone decides to look through the ouija glass piece, you feel yourself tense up expecting something to happen.

    Kids in horror films are the go to for anything scary. Most movies tend to cast children horribly and they end of ruining the film. Doris, played by Lulu Wilson delivers an innocent and somewhat chilling performance as the youngest daughter. Her goodbye message to a young boy about what it feels like to be strangled to death is an excellent scene to send chills down your spine. No scary images, sounds or blood needed. Just a child delivering one monologue about suffocating you.

    Obviously the film is far from perfect, but it doesn't cater to the happy ending crowd either. It takes some chances and for the most part, lands them. I was surprised by how much I liked this film, which may be why the rating is higher than what others would tend to give a film like this. Had the first film never existed, this would be a bigger hit.
    6Echo9-71

    atmospheric horror that deserved a better-written ending

    This is an solid, slow-burn, atmospheric horror movie; well-paced capped off with a thrilling third act. It very effectively combines a simple plot, and natural characterization, with good acting and direction. The result is a compelling story that is believeable and susupenseful.

    At the end of the final act, I was thinking "high-fives all-around, good job guys" and was about to give this two thumbs up.

    And then, inexplicably, in the last 5 minutes the filmmakers revert to cheesy B-horror cliches making for a jarring denoument that simply feels wrong.

    WTF? Was that studio exec interference or just plain bad judgement? Nope. Because it's a prequel (to a movie I haven't seen yet), I guess it had to end with a bridge to the other movie. But it could have and should have been better, so the truth is, it's just bad writing. The last few minutes just don't match the tone or narrative arc of the first hour and a half, and it comes across feeling like a cheap add-on. Not a twist ("cool!"), or a surprise ("gotcha!") just lame ("seriously? Pffthtttt!") (That's the raspberry sound, BTW.)

    This movie should have wrapped up nicely at 1:27:25. If it had: 8/10.

    With the dopey last 4 and a half minutes added: 6/10.

    PS - If you can, stop watching at 1:27:25 and just imagine a better CODA; e.g., Lana, the sensible one, getting on with her life as best she can, and the Ouija board washing up on some beach like in Jumanji.
    7SnoopyStyle

    shockingly pretty good

    It's 1967 Los Angeles. Alice Zander (Elizabeth Reaser) runs a crooked spiritual reading business out of her home. She uses her daughters Lina (Annalise Basso) and younger Doris (Lulu Wilson) in operating her scams. They incorporate an Ouija board into their production. While trying to contact the girls' dead father, Doris seems to make real contact. Father Tom (Henry Thomas) is the headmaster of the girls' school. Mikey (Parker Mack) has a crush on Lina.

    Surprise! This is actually good. It is well-made. The characters are well-drawn and well-acted. I wouldn't say that this is breaking down any new walls but there is good in doing good work. I do have a couple of small nitpicks. For some reason, Alice and Father Tom go out for what looks like a fancy dinner. It almost looks like a date if it weren't for the characters. Second, I would keep the possibility that Doris is scamming everyone until further into the movie. It would be nice to have Father Tom uncover the whole situation as a reveal. The good are the actors, the mood, the simple premise, and good construction. It's a shocker that this is all pretty good.
    6Reno-Rangan

    So this is where it all began!

    It is a decent horror film, but surely better than the first. The previous part was an usual teen themed horror where everything started as a playful. But this one was a prequel and it focused on the origins. A single mother with two daughters is making money helping the people who want to contact their beloved dead ones. The things changes when her little daughter started to communicate the spirits of her own. The chaos unleashes, the house becomes haunted and the family begins to fall apart.

    Keeping it simple is what worked out well for the film, despite thematically borrowed from others, scenes were kind of familiar and characters intentionally developed. Particularly the priest role was the most overused in any horror film. Followed by the twist. That turning point was good, but not a new. Nice performances and well shot film. Ouija is a fine concept for a horror theme and with this film's somewhat success, I hope the next one would only get better. So it is worth a watch, if you're not anticipating a something special.

    6/10

    इस तरह के और

    Ouija
    4.5
    Ouija
    Oculus
    6.5
    Oculus
    Before I Wake
    6.2
    Before I Wake
    ऐनाबेल: क्रिएशन
    6.5
    ऐनाबेल: क्रिएशन
    Lights Out
    6.3
    Lights Out
    मामा
    6.2
    मामा
    Hush
    6.6
    Hush
    Annabelle Comes Home
    5.9
    Annabelle Comes Home
    The Boy
    6.0
    The Boy
    Insidious: Chapter 3
    6.1
    Insidious: Chapter 3
    Annabelle
    5.5
    Annabelle
    Insidious
    6.8
    Insidious

    कहानी

    बदलाव करें

    क्या आपको पता है

    बदलाव करें
    • ट्रिविया
      The film was shot digitally, but director and editor Mike Flanagan, in order to add a retro feel to the film, added elements in post-production to give the appearance of a movie shot on film. Those include the 'cigarette burns', marks that appear every 20 minutes or so in the upper right corner of the frame, which were used to signal a change of reels for film projected.
    • गूफ़
      In order to make the film appear more authentic for the time in which it is set (1967), cue marks, or "reel change" marks, are inserted at approximately every 20 minutes. However, the marks are oval when they should actually be circular, since this is a film presented in a 1.85:1 aspect ratio and not in a 2.39:1 aspect ratio. The only time the marks should be oval is if a film is projected with an anamorphic lens. On an anamorphic film print, the cue marks are circular, but the anamorphic lens makes the circle look like an oval when projected on a screen.
    • भाव

      Doris Zander: Wanna hear something cool?

      Mikey: Sure.

      Doris Zander: Do you know what it feels like to be strangled to death? First, you feel the pressure in your throat. Your eyes water, and you start to taste something very, very sour in your mouth. Then it's like someone lights a match right in the middle of your chest, and that fire grows. It fills your lungs, and your throat, and all the way behind your eyes. And finally, that fire turns to ice; like pins and needles of ice are sticking into your fingers, your toes, your arms. You see stars, then darkness. And the last thing you feel... is cold.

      [Mikey looks confused and horrified]

      Doris Zander: [smiles] Goodnight, Romeo.

    • क्रेज़ी क्रेडिट
      There is a post-credits scene with Lin Shaye.
    • कनेक्शन
      Featured in FoundFlix: Ouija 2: Origin of Evil (2016) Ending Explained + Connections to the First Film (2016)
    • साउंडट्रैक
      You Gotta Move Me
      Written by Dennis Michael Lacey

      Performed by Mike Lacey

      Courtesy of Crucial Music Corporation

    टॉप पसंद

    रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
    साइन इन करें

    अक्सर पूछे जाने वाला सवाल20

    • How long is Ouija: Origin of Evil?Alexa द्वारा संचालित

    विवरण

    बदलाव करें
    • रिलीज़ की तारीख़
      • 8 नवंबर 2018 (भारत)
    • कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
      • यूनाइटेड स्टेट्स
    • आधिकारिक साइटें
      • Official Facebook
      • Official Instagram
    • भाषाएं
      • अंग्रेज़ी
      • युक्रेनियन
    • इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
      • Ouija: el origen del mal
    • फ़िल्माने की जगहें
      • Clark Residences - 306 Loma Drive, लॉस एंजेल्स, कैलिफोर्निया, संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका(the girl's school)
    • उत्पादन कंपनियां
      • Universal Pictures
      • Platinum Dunes
      • Blumhouse Productions
    • IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें

    बॉक्स ऑफ़िस

    बदलाव करें
    • बजट
      • $90,00,000(अनुमानित)
    • US और कनाडा में सकल
      • $3,51,44,505
    • US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
      • $1,40,65,500
      • 23 अक्तू॰ 2016
    • दुनिया भर में सकल
      • $8,17,05,746
    IMDbPro पर बॉक्स ऑफ़िस की विस्तार में जानकारी देखें

    तकनीकी विशेषताएं

    बदलाव करें
    • चलने की अवधि
      1 घंटा 39 मिनट
    • रंग
      • Color
    • ध्वनि मिश्रण
      • Datasat
      • Dolby Digital
      • Dolby Atmos
      • DTS
      • SDDS
    • पक्ष अनुपात
      • 1.85 : 1

    इस पेज में योगदान दें

    किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें
    Lulu Wilson in Ouija: Origin of Evil (2016)
    टॉप गैप
    What was the official certification given to Ouija: Origin of Evil (2016) in Japan?
    जवाब
    • और अंतराल देखें
    • योगदान करने के बारे में और जानें
    पेज में बदलाव करें

    एक्सप्लोर करने के लिए और भी बहुत कुछ

    हाल ही में देखे गए

    कृपया इस फ़ीचर का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए ब्राउज़र कुकीज़ चालू करें. और जानें.
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    ज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करेंज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करें
    सोशल पर IMDb को फॉलो करें
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    Android और iOS के लिए
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    • सहायता
    • साइट इंडेक्स
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb डेटा लाइसेंस
    • प्रेस रूम
    • विज्ञापन
    • नौकरियाँ
    • उपयोग की शर्तें
    • गोपनीयता नीति
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, एक Amazon कंपनी

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.