IMDb रेटिंग
5.1/10
9.9 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
जब निकोल फादर एंटोन के संपर्क में आती है तो ज्यादा से ज्यादा समझ में न आने वाली घटनाएं होती हैं. दोनों यह मानने लगते हैं कि पुजारी एक राक्षस के साथ लड़ाई हार चुका है.जब निकोल फादर एंटोन के संपर्क में आती है तो ज्यादा से ज्यादा समझ में न आने वाली घटनाएं होती हैं. दोनों यह मानने लगते हैं कि पुजारी एक राक्षस के साथ लड़ाई हार चुका है.जब निकोल फादर एंटोन के संपर्क में आती है तो ज्यादा से ज्यादा समझ में न आने वाली घटनाएं होती हैं. दोनों यह मानने लगते हैं कि पुजारी एक राक्षस के साथ लड़ाई हार चुका है.
Florian Voicu
- Tavian
- (as Florian Constantin Voicu)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Like 'The Exorcism of Emily Rose' (based on the true story of Anneliese Michel) this movie is also based on the true story of the Tanacu exorcism, which was a case wherein Maricica Irina Cornici, a mentally ill nun at the Romanian Orthodox Church monastery of Tanacu in Vaslui County, Romania, was killed during an exorcism by priest Daniel Petre Corogeanu with the help of four other nuns.
Adelina's story is told through a series of flashbacks and this is where there are some truly disturbing elements and shocking visuals which push the genre from murder/mystery/thriller to actual horror.
The Romanian setting has an almost Gothic allure and certainly adds atmosphere.
Although there were some cheap jump-scares it did actually manage to shock (and disgust) me a couple of times when something 'real' occurred.
I don't want to come across as negative in this review as this is a nicely made movie, however it's nothing I haven't seen before (done better).
6/10
Adelina's story is told through a series of flashbacks and this is where there are some truly disturbing elements and shocking visuals which push the genre from murder/mystery/thriller to actual horror.
The Romanian setting has an almost Gothic allure and certainly adds atmosphere.
Although there were some cheap jump-scares it did actually manage to shock (and disgust) me a couple of times when something 'real' occurred.
I don't want to come across as negative in this review as this is a nicely made movie, however it's nothing I haven't seen before (done better).
6/10
What the hell is this crap? What happened here?
This is so by the numbers, so bland, so boring. Check it out: every single jump scare in this movie, which is pretty much every single "scare", is accomplished with an ear piercingly loud sound. Seriously. Every time. A car horn. A dogs bark. A bang on a door. And the sound is so ridiculously loud, while the talking is super low. Man I was just so effing angry. It pains your ears. And the sound is not even accompanied by scary imagery! Most of the times it's just a fake scare. With SUCH loud noise. JEEEZ.
The best thing about the movie is Sophie Cookson. She does the best she can with a very uninteresting and boring script. There is very little gore, the little there is is OK. There are a couple of effects, they also work. But all in all it's just very tame. The story, I think, leans on being "true". Unfortunately it's still boring.
I should probably give this a lower score, but if my mood were better I think I might have enjoyed it more. Also, the movie does have some qualities, it's just all to by the numbers.
This is so by the numbers, so bland, so boring. Check it out: every single jump scare in this movie, which is pretty much every single "scare", is accomplished with an ear piercingly loud sound. Seriously. Every time. A car horn. A dogs bark. A bang on a door. And the sound is so ridiculously loud, while the talking is super low. Man I was just so effing angry. It pains your ears. And the sound is not even accompanied by scary imagery! Most of the times it's just a fake scare. With SUCH loud noise. JEEEZ.
The best thing about the movie is Sophie Cookson. She does the best she can with a very uninteresting and boring script. There is very little gore, the little there is is OK. There are a couple of effects, they also work. But all in all it's just very tame. The story, I think, leans on being "true". Unfortunately it's still boring.
I should probably give this a lower score, but if my mood were better I think I might have enjoyed it more. Also, the movie does have some qualities, it's just all to by the numbers.
Had seen the trailer n was looking forward to it. My curiosity n excitement doubled after i came to kno that its directed by Xavier Glens. I am surprised that after making such a brutal n atmospheric film, Frontiere(s), what made Glens create such a slow n tame film.
Saw this on a rented dvd. It is a beautifully shot film. The Romanian country side was pleasant but the overall film was a disappointment. Firstly, the film was unoriginal, stale n not scary enuff for horror fans. Its more like an investigative mystery drama but predictable. U can call it poor mans Exorcism of Emily Rose.
Forget the blood, nudity or sex, the story was dull, the tension was zero n the character development nada. In the trailer v get to see spiders in the crotch which was scary but the real scene in the film is meh. Also, in the trailer v get to see the needle scene which was again scary but the scene in the movie was a blink n a miss.
I decided to watch this film because I was attracted to the fact that it was based on a true story and that it is connected to Romania, which is very close to my city.
Anyway, the film is quite good. The rating of 5 here really does not reflect the overall experience.
I would give 10 for the setting, the interiors ( especially the room of the possessed girl and the churches and all the rooms ) as they have that 'something' that really stands out.
The acting of all the actors, except the main actress is really good. The main reporter girl is kinda too ... hasty and there was something about her abrupt ways that did not click with me. Maybe she was meant to be like that.
The last ( 2nd exorcism) was kinda non believable while the 1st one was on point.
I am not 100% sure if they filmed all in Romania but it looked that way and that gave extra + to the story.
My rating is 8. The film was entertaining and interesting 99% of the time.
Anyway, the film is quite good. The rating of 5 here really does not reflect the overall experience.
I would give 10 for the setting, the interiors ( especially the room of the possessed girl and the churches and all the rooms ) as they have that 'something' that really stands out.
The acting of all the actors, except the main actress is really good. The main reporter girl is kinda too ... hasty and there was something about her abrupt ways that did not click with me. Maybe she was meant to be like that.
The last ( 2nd exorcism) was kinda non believable while the 1st one was on point.
I am not 100% sure if they filmed all in Romania but it looked that way and that gave extra + to the story.
My rating is 8. The film was entertaining and interesting 99% of the time.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाInsipred by the alleged true story of the Tanacu Exorcism, that happened in 2005, in Romania.
- गूफ़At 51:02 the female lead is awoken by a noise and her night shirt is open, exposing part of her breast. The camera angle switches to the door and back, but at 51:07, her shirt is clearly buttoned all the way up.
- कनेक्शनReferenced in Minty Comedic Arts: 10 Things You Didn't Know About RAD (2021)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is The Crucifixion?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Crucifixión
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $65,54,322
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 30 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें