यह फ़ैनटास्टिक बीस्ट सीरीज़ की, मैजिज़ूलॉजिस्ट, न्यूट स्कैमेंडर के रोमांचक सफ़र की कहानी का दुसरा भाग है.यह फ़ैनटास्टिक बीस्ट सीरीज़ की, मैजिज़ूलॉजिस्ट, न्यूट स्कैमेंडर के रोमांचक सफ़र की कहानी का दुसरा भाग है.यह फ़ैनटास्टिक बीस्ट सीरीज़ की, मैजिज़ूलॉजिस्ट, न्यूट स्कैमेंडर के रोमांचक सफ़र की कहानी का दुसरा भाग है.
- 2 BAFTA अवार्ड के लिए नामांकित
- 3 जीत और कुल 22 नामांकन
Cornell John
- Arnold Guzman
- (as Cornell S. John)
सारांश
Reviewers say 'Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald' offers a darker tone and expanded world-building with mixed reception. Praised for performances by Eddie Redmayne, Johnny Depp, and Jude Law, and impressive visual effects, the film struggles with a convoluted plot and numerous subplots. Critics argue it lacks focus, serving more as a setup for future installments. Disappointment arises from the limited role of fantastic beasts and an underdeveloped villain. Despite these issues, some appreciate its deeper exploration of the wizarding world and ties to the Harry Potter series.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
As both a lover of the Harry Potter Universe and a lover of movie going, I was thoroughly disappointed, even angry with this movie. While the visuals are as magical as ever, it's clear that the filmmakers are so distracted by trying to build a franchise that they're forgetting to actually tell a good story! The chemistry between our main four heroes was diluted by so many new characters being introduced. With so many new people and also so many questions for our old heroes, there wasn't enough time for any kind of (explainable) character development or for the viewers to connect with anyone on the screen. The only "character development" with one of our main heroes felt random and out of character and we aren't given much reason or warning for this change. I was also very disappointed with the writing behind Tina's character as her role was demoted from a strong willed Auror and woman to merely a side kick and love interest. Huge and important elements of the story were left for us only to assume what had happened when discussing the one year time jump between the two films (like the Jacob/Queenie relationship, Jacobs memory, etc.). As a whole, the film screamed "money hungry" and "franchise building" rather than letting us really connect with the characters. It also seemed as if they were only adding in twists that would surely get a reaction from viewers despite the fact that they not only discredited the original Harry Potter films, but just felt like unrealistic and a little too convenient! In short, as a huge fan of the Harry Potter Universe, I was disappointed, upset and felt really let down, and as a film goer, I was confused with the plot and frustrated with the lack of character connection and development! The only reason I have given a 4/10 instead of a 1 is for Eddie Redmayne's perfect execution of the shy, socially awkward but loveable and charming Newt Scamander and for the alluring performance from Jude Law's Dumbledore who leaves us wanting to know more of his history! But in the end, it was a huge disappointment as a stand-alone movie.
Watching this gives you the sense that nobody really knew where to go after the first film ended... and it shows. Beautiful film with a great cast, but an ultimately pointless story that sort of flops around like a dead fish not quite aware yet that its dead. This film is disappointing and forgettable.
The special effects were great as was the scenery, however the movie was disjointed and did not flow. It seemed to jump from one special effect to the next and following the plot was tedious to the point of total boredom.
The movie was entertaining and visually stunning. It was nice to see Newt and co. again, however the two standout performances were from Johnny Depp and Jude Law as Grindelwald and Dumbledore. Well rounded in well played. The special effects were very captivating. 7/10 because the movie gave me what I came for, I was entertained for two hours but I was not blown away.
Although a lot was promised in the trailers, it falls short of those promises in the movie. Having said that, this movie is much like Deathly Hallows Part 1 in the sense that it does not stand out when watched in isolation but understandable in the greater scheme of things, as it sets up the future movies perfectly without offering much on its own.
The acting did a good job although the script doesn't allow for anyone to standout apart from Johnny Depp, who seems to make audiences aware of the fact that he's Johnny Depp every once in a while.
Overall, I feel this movie will be better received when its sequels come out, but mediocre as it stands.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाJohnny Depp signed on without reading a script. He wanted to be a part of the series because he is a self-proclaimed massive fan of the series.
- गूफ़According to the books and Pottermore.com (site created by JK Rowling herself), Minerva McGonagall was born in 1935 and first started teaching at Hogwarts in 1956, when she was 21 years old. Even though the movie is set in 1927, eight years before her birth, she appears as a young professor in Hogwarts.
- भाव
Leta Lestrange: Oh, Newt. You never met a monster you couldn't love.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटThere are no mid- or end-credit scenes.
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनAn extended cut runs ~7 minutes longer.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Animales fantásticos: Los crímenes de Grindelwald
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $20,00,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $15,95,55,901
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $6,21,63,104
- 18 नव॰ 2018
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $65,57,55,901
- चलने की अवधि2 घंटे 14 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें