he City of Gold

All the cast and crews have written the good reviews for this piece of trash. One of the worst movies I have seen in a long time. The writing sucks, the acting sucks, the directing sucks. Do you get the idea that this entire ting sucks? It's more painful to watch this movie than dig my eyes out with a rusty fork.

This is terrible, I don't understand why people even release such garbage

Not worth the time , this movie sucks Its not Allan Quatermain and golden city its ten times worse.

The story begins with almost experimental indie fervere, and raises an eyebrow of interest from the start. The acting is blended, some moments read smoothly while others come off contrived or over-stated. Still, Locke maintains control enough to create an interesting enough story, and the scenes are rich with melodrama and theatrics. There isn'tmuch originality present but the almost graphic novel style of story telling adds a better quality to "City Of Gold.

The special effects are mixed bag choices, cheap CGI and some practical choices create enough thrills to help get the film to action adventure lecels. Budget restrains are obvious and Locke's film pushes the limit with effectiveness. Still all things considered the action and effects scenes work. The real winner is the locations and cinematography. Overall "City Of Gold" is an okay film, just don't go in with blockbuster expectations.

City of Gold is proof that writers should not do drugs while working. This convoluted mess, complete with cheesy cartoons throughout could have been not half bad, but just seemed to be written either on the fly with no regard for coherence or under a drug induced haze. Do not recommend