Milk_Tray_Guy

Made at the 'height' of 'woke-preach' - and it shows. I'm not a massive fan of the 1996 original, but it has its charm (no pun intended), and Robin Tunney, Fairuza Balk, Neve Campbell, and Rachel True are engaging and cute. The leads in this are neither of those things. But hey, it has cool LGBT stuff and some girl's period mishap in the middle of class - so it MUST be good, right? That's all a movie needs these days; never mind about an interesting story with charismatic actors. It's laughable - no wonder this thing bombed ($2.3 million on an $18 million budget). Thank God the audience had more sense than the filmmakers. Don't waste your time. A tiny cameo by Fairuza Balk gets this a 3/10.

I have a real love-hate relationship with Jean Rollin. If I sit down to watch one of his films I can usually rely on two things; 1, the movie will look great, have an intriguing premise, and feature some stunningly beautiful women. And 2, by the end of it I'll feel hugely let-down and look on the whole thing as a missed opportunity. I know a lot of European directors favour 'style over substance', but Rollin often takes that to a new level. The fact that what's good about his stuff is often SO good is exactly what makes it so annoying; if he missed the mark by a mile it wouldn't matter, but the gorgeous cinematography, composition, lighting, and location work just make the whole thing all the more frustrating.

This movie is a rare exception. Two blind girls (supposedly around the 15-16 yr mark, although the actresses seem to be late teens/early twenties) live at a Catholic orphanage/school. However, at night they can see because they're actually vampires, who after 'lights out' leave the orphanage to hunt. These vampires are more along the lines of Stoker's Dracula; they can move around in daylight, but their vampire abilities only manifest at night when their sight returns and they sprout fangs.

There are several kills (six, by my count), but a fair amount of time is also spent lying around in cemeteries as the girls reminisce about their previous lives (it seems they've been hunted, destroyed, and resurrected several times over 500 years) as well as try to remember who they were before they became vampires. Alexandra Pic (looking like a cross between young Ellen Page and young Jennifer Connelly) and Isabelle Teboul have an ethereal presence as the two girls, and there are cameos by Rollin favourites Tina Aumont and Brigitte Lahaie. It's about 10 minutes too long, and there are still some things that don't make any sense - but that's Rollin. It's slow but very watchable. Some nudity - but for Rollin, not much. 7/10.

Soon after landing on Venus a team of American astronauts are attacked by a creature resembling a pterosaur. In order to do defend themselves they kill it. However, Venus is inhabited by a race of women who worshipped the flying creature, and who decide to kill the astronauts in revenge.

This movie started life as a 1962 Russian film called Planeta Bur. US producer Roger Corman got hold of it and decided to overdub it with American actors for a US release. His first attempt met with a very limited success so he tried again. This time he hired a young Peter Bogdanovich to shoot some extra scenes, telling him "AIP won't buy it unless we stick some girls in it." So, Bogdanovich hired blonde bombshell Mamie Van Doren, plus half a dozen or so other blondes, and shot their inserts over five days (their roles mainly involving reclining on the shoreline of a Venusian ocean, whilst posing in skin-tight pants and tops made-up of two strategically placed seashells). Because of this there is no direct onscreen interaction between the women and the astronauts, and as a result the film inevitably feels very disjointed. In its favour, there is a strange dreamlike quality to the scenes on the planet surface, that put me in mind of Mario Bava's (obviously much better) Planet of the Vampires. And the apparent free availability of modern-day hair products and makeup on Venus is worth a laugh every time we get a closeup of one of the centrefold-Venusians. That said, it's a poor movie, and really worth seeing only as a curio. Despite her limited 'role', Van Doren was front and centre for all marketing for obvious reasons. 3.5/10.