garyamedee
A rejoint le févr. 2013
Bienvenue sur nouveau profil
Nos mises à jour sont toujours en cours de développement. Bien que la version précédente de le profil ne soit plus accessible, nous travaillons activement à des améliorations, et certaines fonctionnalités manquantes seront bientôt de retour ! Restez à l'écoute de leur retour. En attendant, l’analyse des évaluations est toujours disponible sur nos applications iOS et Android, qui se trouvent sur la page de profil. Pour consulter la répartition de vos évaluations par année et par genre, veuillez consulter notre nouveau Guide d'aide.
Badges3
Pour savoir comment gagner des badges, rendez-vous sur page d'aide sur les badges.
Évaluations398
Note de garyamedee
Avis9
Note de garyamedee
I jump between enjoying this show and being frustrated that nothing ever seems to happen. The cast is great and the production is well done but the pace of the show is abysmally slow.
I am not sure what the writers are thinking but, as viewers, we need some satisfaction. At the rate it is going boat boy is going to get home just in time for 1973 season 1.
The problem is that there is no real story outside of the standard bad guys want to steal the farm trope and Yellowstone has already beaten that dead horse to hamburger.
It's watchable and mostly enjoyable but they are just trying to squeeze too many episodes out of not enough story.
I am not sure what the writers are thinking but, as viewers, we need some satisfaction. At the rate it is going boat boy is going to get home just in time for 1973 season 1.
The problem is that there is no real story outside of the standard bad guys want to steal the farm trope and Yellowstone has already beaten that dead horse to hamburger.
It's watchable and mostly enjoyable but they are just trying to squeeze too many episodes out of not enough story.
Just a series of loosely related set pieces to either facilitate cameos or distract with explosions and FX.
The whole premise is based on a moronic concept that just doesn't hold up to examination. A crazy lady wants kids. That is the total extent of the plot. Who writes this drivel?
I could understand it in a comic book but if this is the best writing/concept they can come up with for a big budget film they need to find jobs outside the creative field. Maybe they would be more suited to a job in customer service or waste management.
The whole premise is based on a moronic concept that just doesn't hold up to examination. A crazy lady wants kids. That is the total extent of the plot. Who writes this drivel?
I could understand it in a comic book but if this is the best writing/concept they can come up with for a big budget film they need to find jobs outside the creative field. Maybe they would be more suited to a job in customer service or waste management.
The first one was watchable. The second one was utter rot and this one is no better. Who enjoys this stuff?
I can't believe that this film got all the way through production without anyone noticing that it was garbage?
Even Ralph Fiennes couldn't redeem it. He should reconsider the employment status of whoever suggested he take the role. Surely he can't need the money that badly?
It confounds me that anyone enjoys this third rate tripe.
I can't believe that this film got all the way through production without anyone noticing that it was garbage?
Even Ralph Fiennes couldn't redeem it. He should reconsider the employment status of whoever suggested he take the role. Surely he can't need the money that badly?
It confounds me that anyone enjoys this third rate tripe.
Sondages effectués récemment
Total de 2 sondages effectués