NOTE IMDb
3,5/10
1,1 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueNever-before-aired NASA footage presents evidence that the Moon is being used as a base.Never-before-aired NASA footage presents evidence that the Moon is being used as a base.Never-before-aired NASA footage presents evidence that the Moon is being used as a base.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Photos
John Brandenburg
- Self - Clementine Team Member
- (as Dr. John Brandenburg)
Avis à la une
I generally don't watch documentaries of this ilk because i find the conclusions laughably weak and something an 11 year old would come up with. This line sums up everything thats wrong with this:'we ask some of the brightest minds we could find to some up the evidence and whilst they cant be sure of what it is, its very compelling'. So, you cant work out whats happening in your fuzzy pictures. That must mean Aliens have travelled light years to build mines, nuclear reactors, chimneys and buildings on the moon. Nasa is aware of these spacecraft/buildings and airbrush them out of NASA pictures except the ones the show uses. I got at least half way the arguments were so bloody ridiculous i was dumb founded and had to watch out of morbid curiosity. This must be a mockumentory. Nobody is this daft, surely? How Buzz Adlrin managed to keep his cool during interview is the real conspiracy here. Fairplay.
So let's not get too close-minded here and, for the sake of argument, assume the premise: that there are, or were, aliens at work on the moon, either on the near or far side or both. And not only on the moon, but on mars and the sun and the earth as this documentary has it.
So how would you go about it to make people believe it?
Let's look at this very unclear old black and white picture of some part of the moon that shows what looks like an artificially created construction because it might resemble the tower of a nuclear plant and therefore it might be a nuclear plant that might be used to make nuclear devices that could be used for offensive or defensive means, hence we are under a threat, just like in the cold war! And we cannot do anything about it and that is why the government doesn't tell us and wants it to remain a secret! It would start a nation wide crisis and as a result the nation would collapse and be send back to the stone age.
Quite.
Why not build your own telescope then and check out the moon? I read you can now get telescopes to discover 1 km wide objects on the surface of the moon. So that should allow you to see those 22 mile high and wide structures.
But nope. Instead you make a documentary with people with vague credentials (Researcher? What kind of title is that?) who use the word 'might' a lot and conjecture up a whole race of human-like aliens and bemoan government led conspiracies, based on hearsay, flights of fantasies, bad pictures and computer enhanced imagery. And even at some point suggest space battles between aliens. Yep: star wars.
The documentary slowly progresses to its climax, after showing and telling the same thing over and over again and the climax is actually the low point, but an important one as the real truth gets exposed. Supposed pictures of a dead alien woman recovered by the otherwise unrecorded Apollo 20 mission are shown and then a 'researcher' tells us that even if it is a fake it is a clear sign that there is an attempt to misguide people, hence it is a sign of a cover up, hence it is a sign that something is there to be covered up.
And there you have it. The truth that gets exposed here is not that there are aliens on the moon or government conspiracies but the truth that facts do not matter: when facts stand in the way of truth then they get pushed aside, for it is the 'truth' that there are aliens busying themselves with humanity and it is the truth the government knows it and hides it.
It is this documentary that is the conspiracy. And the conspirators see themselves as heroes. But these heroes are fighting windmills. Don Quixotes. In the wikipedia about Don Quixote one can find a very apt quote from Harold Bloom about it, []preferring the glory of fantasy over the real world which includes imminent death[]
And that is what this documentary is. A fantasy, a flight of imagination, the exposure of the silliness of humanity and the sadness one can experience when people, like some astronauts, delude themselves merely because they want to believe something. It is a tragedy and a comedy. It is life.
So how would you go about it to make people believe it?
Let's look at this very unclear old black and white picture of some part of the moon that shows what looks like an artificially created construction because it might resemble the tower of a nuclear plant and therefore it might be a nuclear plant that might be used to make nuclear devices that could be used for offensive or defensive means, hence we are under a threat, just like in the cold war! And we cannot do anything about it and that is why the government doesn't tell us and wants it to remain a secret! It would start a nation wide crisis and as a result the nation would collapse and be send back to the stone age.
Quite.
Why not build your own telescope then and check out the moon? I read you can now get telescopes to discover 1 km wide objects on the surface of the moon. So that should allow you to see those 22 mile high and wide structures.
But nope. Instead you make a documentary with people with vague credentials (Researcher? What kind of title is that?) who use the word 'might' a lot and conjecture up a whole race of human-like aliens and bemoan government led conspiracies, based on hearsay, flights of fantasies, bad pictures and computer enhanced imagery. And even at some point suggest space battles between aliens. Yep: star wars.
The documentary slowly progresses to its climax, after showing and telling the same thing over and over again and the climax is actually the low point, but an important one as the real truth gets exposed. Supposed pictures of a dead alien woman recovered by the otherwise unrecorded Apollo 20 mission are shown and then a 'researcher' tells us that even if it is a fake it is a clear sign that there is an attempt to misguide people, hence it is a sign of a cover up, hence it is a sign that something is there to be covered up.
And there you have it. The truth that gets exposed here is not that there are aliens on the moon or government conspiracies but the truth that facts do not matter: when facts stand in the way of truth then they get pushed aside, for it is the 'truth' that there are aliens busying themselves with humanity and it is the truth the government knows it and hides it.
It is this documentary that is the conspiracy. And the conspirators see themselves as heroes. But these heroes are fighting windmills. Don Quixotes. In the wikipedia about Don Quixote one can find a very apt quote from Harold Bloom about it, []preferring the glory of fantasy over the real world which includes imminent death[]
And that is what this documentary is. A fantasy, a flight of imagination, the exposure of the silliness of humanity and the sadness one can experience when people, like some astronauts, delude themselves merely because they want to believe something. It is a tragedy and a comedy. It is life.
Be prepared for a lot of this: We are presented with a huge photograph of the moon, while zooming in the narrator says: "look at this inexplicable photo". So far, you have no clue what you're supposed to be seeing. Then they highlight something, or ring around something that might, just miiiight look like some sort of structure. Then an "expert" says: this is clearly not natural, but WHO put it there?! And you're left thinking, uhm, couldn't it just have been a mountain or crater or a rock or something..? I mean, there are thousands of moon photos, it's all rock and sand and stuff, of course a bunch of 'em will look like stuff.
One time in particular, they showed the same photo several times in a row, and before the colored highlight came on, I couldn't for the life of me see where the alleged structure was supposed to be. Haha.
Anyway! I'll say though, some of it is kind of interesting. But keep in mind that it might very well be a mockumentary. It's fun to hear the interviews with former employees at NASA etc. but whether they are who they say they are, or whether they are telling the truth or just wants their 15 minutes, is not good to know.
One lady gives a rational explanations for one of the photos, and the narrator quickly brushes it off as a poor attempt at explaining this inexplicable photograph. That's just silly.
Had they just presented all the material, all the pictures and interviews at once, in stead of showing the same picture about 300 billions times, the whole thing could have been 20 minutes. Tops!
but yeah, to sum up, I found it entertaining for the most part, but also really low brow, and quite stupid. Take it for what it is, light conspiracy-ish entertainment, and you'll, well, you could do worse.
One time in particular, they showed the same photo several times in a row, and before the colored highlight came on, I couldn't for the life of me see where the alleged structure was supposed to be. Haha.
Anyway! I'll say though, some of it is kind of interesting. But keep in mind that it might very well be a mockumentary. It's fun to hear the interviews with former employees at NASA etc. but whether they are who they say they are, or whether they are telling the truth or just wants their 15 minutes, is not good to know.
One lady gives a rational explanations for one of the photos, and the narrator quickly brushes it off as a poor attempt at explaining this inexplicable photograph. That's just silly.
Had they just presented all the material, all the pictures and interviews at once, in stead of showing the same picture about 300 billions times, the whole thing could have been 20 minutes. Tops!
but yeah, to sum up, I found it entertaining for the most part, but also really low brow, and quite stupid. Take it for what it is, light conspiracy-ish entertainment, and you'll, well, you could do worse.
Leftover 'experts' that didn't make the cut from paranormal caught on camera.
So 1940 radar technology is used by Aliens located on the moon... Where do they find these people??
So 1940 radar technology is used by Aliens located on the moon... Where do they find these people??
I've seen a lot of garbage over the years, but this by far tops pretty much all the piles of caca on my list. The cast of characters reads like the cast of a Ringling Brothers cleaning crew, the script appears to have been written by a drunk 12-year- old, and the level of intelligence required to view this is just below that of a Walmart baby rattle. The horrid cast of so-called "experts" in this film reads like the patient list at Nurse Ratchett's daily medication rounds. In one scene, they bring up an expert on photography analysis that is billed as a... get this... paranormal expert. Poor Roger Leopardi must have been broke, hungry and way behind on his rent to agree to narrate this spectacularly prepubescent film. Don't waste your time. You'll get more out of watching the grass grow.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 26min(86 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 16:9 HD
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant