99 out of 100 cookies shows suck. Most of the stuff with Gordon sucks, and just entertainment. Only one really good is Top Chef. This ain't to be that.
The good things:
-Hard and competitive challenges. A bit different than Top Chef but not in a bad way. As is, they cook for less people, have more time, more $, and able to have more freedom. Yet it's still a cooking show about food
-Judges appear to be good. The show offers enough detail about the cooking process, although I do feel like it should go into a bit more
-Overall nothing about actual competition that was unpleasant to me
The bad things
-Host, I suppose same as Top Chef s1 host, just a pretty face, without useful commendary. Top Chef's host padma and now new one, def brought in the chops ansd knowledge, vs just eye candy
-Too much drama outside cooking (top chef is guilty of that too)
-Too many tacky placements for cleaning supplies or other things.. FFD for me
-Too much butt licking for the CIA. I know they likely had to, to film there and their staff, but to me it was a bit offputting
Overall, I enjoyed it. I think if they fix a few of these things, it could be a very strong show.
One thing that really separated top chef from any other show is that many of their contestants/winners are actually well known faces in the cooking world now. Time only will tell if this will happen here.