Animated Atrocities

I found his reviews flawed, rushed or sometimes insulting! The thing is that he let's his emotions and massive ego get the best of him. This is true in his "Pet Sitter " when he called out and offended one of the writers for not satisfying his ridiculously high standers. Not to mention the production quality is pretty low in his episodes. Also, he quite an egotistical person. His reviewers sometimes feel rush out and unthought out which is quite unprofessional I might add. For example on his " Brothers Grunt" he kept repeating the same two to three points over and over again throughout the entire video. Finally he takes things too seriously. For example, most of his MLP FiM reviews can have him swearing like a sailor and insulting the writers or just him screaming on top of this lungs.

This show definitely is not to my taste. The show features Mr. Enter commenting on several children's cartoons. Frankly this show is unpleasant, Mr.Enter does not review the shows fairly as he only ever talks about the negative aspects; granted the show is called Animated Atrocities but it is not fair reviewing to only talk about what it does wrong unless the show is an absolute abysmal, which 9 times out of 10 the show he is reviewing is not. Also Enter is really angry in this show. You have to have several emotions when making these kind of videos, just plain anger doesn't hold my attention nor does it create anything of substance, you can use happiness, anger, sadness, melancholy, excitement but just showing annoyance does not bring anything new or exciting to the table.

The show also lacks comedy, I'm assuming that he is doing this as a riff sort of thing, like what the Nostaglia Critic or Jontron do in their web-series. However many of the episodes do not have any jokes or anything of that sort, and an awful lot of the ones that do Enter has to really stretch to make a joke, or just settle for an easy target. Granted there are many times that Enter can make good jokes and he does seem to have a good sense comedic timing, however a lot of the comedy is not spectacular The editing is not exactly top notch either. There are many audio glitches and sometimes when he is talking he gets cut off mid sentence. And the footage is also looped very often, it gets very monotonous looking at the same clip over and over again. When he started this series Enter was an amateur so the poor editing is excusable, however he is using Patreon for this series now so I think that if he is making money from this then the editing has to be tuned up. Enter should invest in good editing software such as Sony Vegas Pro, or he could commission an editor Enter lacks variety in what he reviews. The majority of his reviews are targeted towards the Spongebob Squarepants show, it is very important to have diversity in what you are reviewing, if you review the same thing over and over again then there is nothing new or noteworthy.

I've notices that his biggest complaint amongst what he reviews is that it is violent or mean-spirited. There are many films, television programs, books and other media that are mean spirited but they are still good. I honestly do not see a problem with this material. I used to watch shows like this when I was a child and I'm not some kind of violent maniac. Children are not idiots, they understand that what happens on TV and in real life are two very different things so there is no risk of the average child pummelling their best friend with a hammer because a starfish told them to. Obviously there are some things such as a Clockwork Orange which shouldn't be shown to young children but cartoons are absolutely harmless. To be frank, saying that Spongebob is violent sounds like something an overprotective mum would say.

Mr. Enter clearly needs to work on some things on his show, as right now it is not very impressive

I don't mind Mr. Enter's content too much. I feel like he gets too much hate, simply because he whines so much in a lot of his reviews. His reviews can be good, but then his reviews can just be him repeating himself over and over again.

Mr. Enter can bring up some interesting points on a subject. His Admirable Animation on Duck Dodgers' Samurai Quack was pretty good. He goes into detail on how to make a respectful parody, while still maintaining some kind of funny aspect. Another great Admirable Animation of his is his Gravity Falls review on 'Land before swine'. In that review he describes how to deal with two characters that have the same goals, but different dynamics at the same time.

Sometimes his animated atrocities are just him rambling & repeating about 'how he doesn't like gross out cartoons' & etc. And he gets a little too p1ssed off from a piece of fiction. To the point where he makes no valid opinions while rambling.

The guy clearly doesn't need the hate that he gets. There are worse cartoon community channels out there. Such as 'Valiksisbum', Phantom Strider after he jumped the shark, Channel Frederator after they jumped the shark, small channels that talk nonstop about TTG, etc. But then again there are better Cartoon Youtubers that get their point across in a superior way within the community. Such as PieGuyRulez, Rebeltaxi, Lewtoons and etc.

This guy is my favorite reviewer on YouTube. This guy pretty much sums it up on how bad animation is on TV. I watch other Animated Atrocities, but I really like to watch the episode if it's about Nickelodeon. I also watch Admirable Animation, too. I like it, also. Of course there is some good animation out there. So if you ever want to see how bad most animation is now a days, watch this series on YouTube. Some of my favorite Atrocities is Love Loaf (Breadwinners), Fart Baby (Sanjay and Craig), A Pal for Gary (SpongeBob), Save the Tooth (Glenn Martin DDS), and so many more. This guy puts a lot of variety in his videos. One of my favorite people and reviewers on YouTube. So, I just want to say, Keep on keeping on, Mr. Enter! Keep up the good work!

I enjoy watching internet reviewers. Two of my favorites are Linkara and the amazingly obscure Comic Strip Critic, and I also enjoy watching MLP reviewers occasionally. I also like Nostalgia Critic, though I guess all the swearing makes me a little uncomfortable, heh.

I was rather intrigued by Mr. Enter due to the subject matter - reviewing really bad episodes of cartoons? Sounds great! But overall, Mr. Enter is just not all that enjoyable as a reviewer. I've watched several episodes because of how interested I am in the subject matter, but I have to admit that I get very little out of what Mr. Enter brings to the table.

Many internet video reviewers focusing on being entertaining, with jokes, fake exaggerated anger, etc. In addition, they may also bring some pretty interesting analysis to the table. Unfortunately, Mr. Enter's analysis is rarely all that outstanding, and he's not all that witty, either. I mean, he's not totally bankrupt, but he just doesn't compare with, well, a GOOD internet video reviewer.

Worst of all, though, he's really, really angry all the time. And it's not acting angry and playing it up for laughs like most "angry critics" online. He's just genuinely angry, and gets wayyy too worked up about everything without having any sense of humor about it. It's just really hard to take, and it's not funny, endearing, or entertaining in the slightest. I mean, just think about how much fun it is to hang around with someone who's constantly getting really enraged and worked up about every little thing. It's just not that fun.

Don't get me wrong, he's not nearly as bad as some people have made him out to be, but overall he's just not that enjoyable.