[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Manipulations

Titre original : Misconduct
  • 2016
  • R
  • 1h 46min
NOTE IMDb
5,3/10
19 k
MA NOTE
Anthony Hopkins, Al Pacino, and Josh Duhamel in Manipulations (2016)
Trailer for Misconduct
Lire trailer1:43
11 Videos
26 photos
CriminalitéDrameMystèreThrillerThriller juridique

Lorsqu'un jeune avocat ambitieux se charge d'une grosse affaire contre le directeur puissant et impitoyable d'une grande entreprise pharmaceutique, il se retrouve vite mêlé à une affaire de ... Tout lireLorsqu'un jeune avocat ambitieux se charge d'une grosse affaire contre le directeur puissant et impitoyable d'une grande entreprise pharmaceutique, il se retrouve vite mêlé à une affaire de chantage et de corruption.Lorsqu'un jeune avocat ambitieux se charge d'une grosse affaire contre le directeur puissant et impitoyable d'une grande entreprise pharmaceutique, il se retrouve vite mêlé à une affaire de chantage et de corruption.

  • Réalisation
    • Shintaro Shimosawa
  • Scénario
    • Simon Boyes
    • Adam Mason
  • Casting principal
    • Josh Duhamel
    • Anthony Hopkins
    • Al Pacino
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    5,3/10
    19 k
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Shintaro Shimosawa
    • Scénario
      • Simon Boyes
      • Adam Mason
    • Casting principal
      • Josh Duhamel
      • Anthony Hopkins
      • Al Pacino
    • 127avis d'utilisateurs
    • 39avis des critiques
    • 24Métascore
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
    • Récompenses
      • 1 victoire au total

    Vidéos11

    Misconduct
    Trailer 1:43
    Misconduct
    MISCONDUCT Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:11
    MISCONDUCT Official Trailer
    MISCONDUCT Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:11
    MISCONDUCT Official Trailer
    I Fight To Win
    Clip 0:48
    I Fight To Win
    Are You Happy
    Clip 0:53
    Are You Happy
    Friend Request
    Clip 0:59
    Friend Request
    I Never Wanted Anyof This
    Clip 1:11
    I Never Wanted Anyof This

    Photos25

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 20
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux52

    Modifier
    Josh Duhamel
    Josh Duhamel
    • Ben Cahill
    Anthony Hopkins
    Anthony Hopkins
    • Arthur Denning
    Al Pacino
    Al Pacino
    • Charles Abrams
    Alice Eve
    Alice Eve
    • Charlotte Cahill
    Malin Akerman
    Malin Akerman
    • Emily Hynes
    Lee Byung-hun
    Lee Byung-hun
    • The Accountant
    Julia Stiles
    Julia Stiles
    • Jane Clemente
    Glen Powell
    Glen Powell
    • Doug Fields
    Marcus Lyle Brown
    Marcus Lyle Brown
    • Joe Bilson
    Leah McKendrick
    Leah McKendrick
    • Amy
    Christopher Rodriguez Marquette
    Christopher Rodriguez Marquette
    • Giffords
    • (as Christopher Marquette)
    Skye P. Marshall
    Skye P. Marshall
    • Hatty
    Gregory Alan Williams
    Gregory Alan Williams
    • Richard Hill
    Jason Gibson
    • Graham
    Nathan Moore
    Nathan Moore
    • Lawrence
    • (as Nathan J. Moore)
    Chris J. Fanguy
    Chris J. Fanguy
    • Cop #2
    • (as Chris Fanguy)
    Jaiden Kaine
    Jaiden Kaine
    • Doctor Hughes
    Kamilla Bjorlin
    • Susie
    • (as Milla Bjorn)
    • Réalisation
      • Shintaro Shimosawa
    • Scénario
      • Simon Boyes
      • Adam Mason
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs127

    5,318.7K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    6bcheng93

    if you are not a hater and don't pick apart the movie, you'll enjoy it

    ...there are very few perfect movies that have been made, can't understand the venom and the hate coming from the other 4 reviewers...i'm the 5th. personally..i totally enjoyed the movie...because i didn't try to pick it apart, Alice Eve did just fine in the acting department and what a beauty she is too. not Oscar worthy but everything was professionally done...the movie kept me engrossed for its whole duration. personally, for me..i liked that little twist at the end. in my opinion this movie is a solid 6...which means its very watchable( for majority of people...not for the nitpickers). don't believe the naysayers who are ripping the movie, take a chance on it and make up your own opinion. hahaha compare to the movie (Heist) that came out 2015 this would look like an Oscar contender....now that was a bad movie and has a higher rating then this. i turn off that movie 1/2 way through..that was a bad movie..this one is not. again...don't believe the naysayers and do take a chance on this movie if you are a fan of decent thrillers.
    5siderite

    Failed on so many levels

    The plot is twisting, twisting and twisting again, while characters that seem to be one thing are revealed to be another, interacting in all kinds of ways. However, in order for a story to be successful, the plot needs to be interesting and the characters well defined before you do the plot twisting. Bottom line: a lot atwist about nothing. Now there's some Shakespeare for you.

    Yet somehow things are getting worse and worse: known actors have puny or plain bad roles, the acting is mediocre at best, the editing of the scenes, vague and not linear in time, confuses the hell out of the viewer. The girls: Julia Stiles, Malin Akerman, Alice Eve - they do the best with their roles, in fact they are the best actors in this film, far outclassing old farts like Pacino and Hopkins, who's only purpose in life nowadays is to give megalomaniacal speeches.

    A special mention for Alice Eve. She did a weird kind of interpretation which was awesome. I don't know if it was her idea or the director's, but her character gave me the creeps. It just wasn't completely right for this movie.

    Conclusion: a waste of time and talent. A confusing story that feels like someone's ego trip, a boring film, a pointless story.
    4r4nd0

    A movie you can skip in my humble opinion.

    I didn't liked this movie. The acting seemed to me unnatural, all of the actors were over-calm an emotionless, it was like a film for androids, at least in most of it. The plot had a potential but it was unrealized for a lot of reasons, I think mostly the directing. As the action was moving towards the end the whole thing became even more messy and sporadic and it all ended with a grand finale of nonsense.

    Sorry about my poor English but I felt obliged to prevent other people from seeing that movie. I'm a simple man and I don't know much about the art cinematography but I can distinguish a bad movie when I see it, believe me.
    MT-15087

    Misconduct Massively Misfires

    The genre of the movie is described as a drama/thriller. In fact, the only thrilling thing about it would be having to decide what's more dubious here – the writing or directing. Or what's less interesting about the lead – his face or his acting. The only remotely redeeming quality of this movie in terms of its performances is the participation of those two gentlemen you can see on the poster in the background. They at least somewhat deliver – a minor feat given the material that they're given. So, obviously, the material itself has none. And the only real mystery you may need to unravel is why three men responsible for a handful of mediocre horrors conspired this time to produce a horribly mediocre thriller which literally contains nothing. If you want a comparatively decent drama involving corrupt corporations and providing some social commentary - watch "The Constant Gardener". If you want a stylish "corporate thriller" subterraneanly reflecting upon human nature - watch "Demonlover". This one is hardly any good for anything. However, there is still something really dramatic about it – it's realizing that this kind of stuff is all Hollywood has to offer to the great ones like Pacino today.
    5frantiqa

    Message unclear

    Somebody mentioned the emotionless acting, and even if I can second that to some degree, there was a requirement for some of them to display that psychotic trait so the movie would make sense, and therefore a strange thing to comment on in my opinion. I wouldn't bash on the acting so much as maybe the screenplay. The movie is built up as a true thriller should, to leave clues along the way until the last final scene which then will uncover the truth. It got a little too scrambled up, to try to follow the timeline, but I still enjoyed the dark feeling to the movie. Although I'm still not quite sure I understood what really happen I think I will give it another look to pick up clues I didn't get the first time. I think there's something to be told here, I'm just not sure the director got the message clear.

    Vous aimerez aussi

    Hangman
    5,2
    Hangman
    En toute humilité: The Humbling
    5,5
    En toute humilité: The Humbling
    Manglehorn
    5,5
    Manglehorn
    American Traitor: The Trial of Axis Sally
    5,7
    American Traitor: The Trial of Axis Sally
    The Pirates of Somalia
    6,7
    The Pirates of Somalia
    88 minutes
    5,9
    88 minutes
    Un flic pour cible
    5,1
    Un flic pour cible
    Les Derniers Affranchis
    6,4
    Les Derniers Affranchis
    Salomé
    6,2
    Salomé
    Danny Collins
    7,0
    Danny Collins
    La loi et l'ordre
    6,0
    La loi et l'ordre
    Phil Spector
    6,2
    Phil Spector

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      Made just £97 (about $125) in its U.K. opening weekend, with an average of four viewers per screen.
    • Gaffes
      It would be close to impossible for any law firm to draft, finalize, and arrange formal service of a fraud complaint against a billionaire, plus schedule a deposition with him, all in less than one week. A demand for production of documents is usually needed first, with a minimum of two weeks for the plaintiff to respond, then a deposition is scheduled to obtain the plaintiff's testimony about the documents.
    • Citations

      Denning: Now you're down in the rabbit hole, how far are you willing to go to get hurt? It's better to go too far than not far enough.

    • Connexions
      Referenced in Cinematic Excrement: 2nd Look: Hillary's America (2023)
    • Bandes originales
      Head Trip
      Written & Performed by Lee Coombs

      Courtesy of Cutting Edge Music (Holdings) Limited

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ18

    • How long is Misconduct?Alimenté par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 5 février 2016 (États-Unis)
    • Pays d’origine
      • États-Unis
    • Site officiel
      • Official site (Japan)
    • Langue
      • Anglais
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Falta de ética
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Nouvelle-Orléans, Louisiane, États-Unis
    • Sociétés de production
      • Grindstone Entertainment Group
      • Mike and Marty Productions
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Budget
      • 11 000 000 $US (estimé)
    • Montant brut mondial
      • 2 049 761 $US
    Voir les infos détaillées du box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      • 1h 46min(106 min)
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Rapport de forme
      • 2.35 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.