I personally don't see the point of bringing back this story and making a 3 part mini series out of it. I always see these kind of "documentaries" as lurid and sensationalist, just like trashy tabloids do, and don't see this one as more investigative than what it really is: a clickbait. But hey, that's what Netflix and others are all about now eh? Funny how interviewees complain about the large interest of people for the case and media harassment... when this type of media just does the same right?. One ex of Trintignant saying "What I would've liked is that we no longer hear about this guy at all" well guess what? You're talking about him! Years and years after! In a documentary that will air on Netflix! So you're in for a treat! I really question the good faith and "journalism" work of the author(s), why (always) talking about a rockstar when you can tell stories of unknown people who live the same? Oh right, unknown women names are mentionned at the end! Why the author had to ask herself so many questions and had to know what happened to these celebrities? That's paparazzi stuff, not research work. Especially when she appears on camera! Was it necessary? Or a tad narcissistic?... When a simple narrative would've been enough and made it shorter.. My personal opinion but that always bugs me and makes me wonder...
So! Nothing is new here, you can watch good and exhaustive recaps on Youtube. It was way too long, I had to watch in x2 speed. 50 mn were enough given the elements that were discussed.
Also, make sure you use the word "empathy" correctly and don't mix it up with "sympathy".