Royal-ish

I don't hate Hallmark but... please stop making British Royal movies. Or at least watch how British is done by the BBC.... Watched the first few seconds of supposed Fencing, and it was painful to watch. Awkward, stumbling and inept, take them off grass and teach these 'actors' how to move/fight.

A good example of Fencing for film... check our Wednesday.

Please stop these American royal movies.

The costuming is cheap and crass, lacking any style and quality. If you must make these movies then stop shopping at Disney for cloths... The one star is really a no-star, for 'Royal-ish'

Error code saying review is too short ..... so this is added....

The premise is pure Hallmark: Theme park princess meet handsome real life prince.

However, there are some very un-Hallmark issues here; the Princess is worried about aging out of her job and is frustrated by her unfinished educational goals, the prince's young daughter has emotional issues due to the death of her mother.

So, it's not perfect in this tale of fairy land meets real life fairy land.

The problem is how the Prince is portrayed. He talks in formal complete sentences and acts like his shorts are too small. A bad parody of what Americans think "Royals" are like.

Cardboard antagonists (the icy Queen and "Privy Council" head) are there to create roadblocks.

In private conversations the Prince acts and sounds entirely artificial. How about having him have two personas...one stuffy and "official" when acting in a official capacity and another where he talks and acts like a regular guy when talking to his daughter and the young woman trying to help her? The script DOES have him talk with the child and princess, but the actor uses the same tone all the time.

Do the Hallmark execs think a character with two facets (personas) is too subtle for audiences?

I hate to say it, but you have to blame the director here. A bit of subtle characterization would have done wonders here. I'm no Scorsese, but after watching a few takes I would if had the actor do the scene both ways...the traditional stilted Hallmark method, and one where the prince is acting less stereotypically "royal" when he needs to. When talking privately, make him a real person, not a stuffy stereotype.

Sakura does a wonderful job given her constraints, Moseley given his experience playing a modern prince in "The Royals" soap should have pushed his character to make him more realistic and relatable.

I hope to see more of Sakura, she comes across as much more real and worldly than the usual Hallmark lead female.

The basics were there to make it a much warmer, more dramatic and touching (but still HEA) film.

Hopefully Hallmark will let writers, directors and actors expand from their (admittedly successful) approach.

Hallmark isn't good at producing "royal" themed movies, the plots and scripts are usually dumb and the dialog inane. That's the case with this movie, plus the female lead doesn't really work. William Moseley was in a far better movie "Christmas in Notting Hill" in 2023. The supporting cast were generally good.

The plot of this one is cliched, it's been done many times and most of the times they've bombed, like this movie. Hallmark really needs a new head of production who can find good scripts and good leads and make good rom-coms, their specialty. As always the filming locations in Canada are beautiful.

I've been a little over all the royal type movies in the last 5 years, but I happened upon the premier of this movie tonight. Oh. My. Gosh. This was a lovely movie! Love the casting and overall storyline. I was a big fan of the actress who played Cheyenne in Superstore, so seeing her in this role was a complete 180 to that character. Pleasantly surprised she plays both so well. It also took a deep dive into IMDB to realize the prince is Peter from Chronicles of Narnia. Chemistry was fantastic and believable. While we all know basically how these movies end, this was still a really nice watch. Highly recommend!

Take a look at Princess Sweet Pea and watch her in the formal Tea Party where she meets Prince Henry and the impression one takes away is that not only is this a fantasy story, but the people producing it don't expect any other impression. It's cute. It parodies a little what goes on at a famous theme park we know where there is a store that you can take you little princess to buy a dress and visit the beauty salon to get all made up. If you have never been, yes, there is such a place and I could easily see this scene playing out there.

But then the story leaves the fantasy castle and theme park and goes out into the world leading eventually back to Henry's mother's kingdom.

We have a fanciful story that has what you need for a carefree fun time. Lacey is so good with Sophie that if it doesn't bring a tear, at least you want to go "Ahh".

But there is a bit of darkness in the kingdom as well. Many of these Royal romance stories have a Queen who always gives off a serious vibe and often some chastising as well. But if that's not enough there is also a royal advisor who is even more depressing. Obviously a potential villain, but he is almost as bad as "he who shall never be named".

If ever there was a commoner who didn't belong in the prince's world, it is Lacey who ironically has a job as a princess in a fantasy world.

As often happens where a child is as important to the story as this one, Lacey's screen time is split between Sophie and Henry making it harder to see chemistry between Nichole Sakura and William Moseley. The real chemistry is between Sakura and Francesca Europa as Rose.

I often complain in this genre about a character completely changing personality instantly. Emily Swan does that in spades as the queen.

In general terms the story is predictable. The obstacle to the romance is just like it is in so many Royal romance movies. The reconciliation is a little cute.

Because of some of the unusual, even quirky aspects of this story, there are some highlights. I mentioned the sentimental and the fanciful.