Ajouter une intrigue dans votre languePhilly mechanic Johnny is surprised to learn that his long-lost father is a duke. But the duke isn't quite what he expected, nor are his growing feelings for the duke's advisor Prudence.Philly mechanic Johnny is surprised to learn that his long-lost father is a duke. But the duke isn't quite what he expected, nor are his growing feelings for the duke's advisor Prudence.Philly mechanic Johnny is surprised to learn that his long-lost father is a duke. But the duke isn't quite what he expected, nor are his growing feelings for the duke's advisor Prudence.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Andrew W. Walker
- Johnny Payne
- (as Andrew Walker)
Eva-Jane Gaffney
- Beth
- (as Eva Jane Gaffney)
Kevin Currid
- Lord Quince
- (non crédité)
Janet Grene
- Party Guest
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
I pretty much steer clear of Hallmark these days. Most of it is highly obnoxious. But for reasons unknown I gave this one a shot. And it wasn't bad. It wasn't great but it managed to be cute enough reminiscent of some of the cute but not so great old Hallmark fare.
Andrew Walker did well of a bit awkward at first playing a 38 year old man who kinda acted like a 22 year old kid. But he got better enough as it went along. The actress who played Prudence had to grow on me but when she did in liked her well enough.
The story was simplistic and predictable but that's not always a problem. The villains were cartoonish and unnecessary. A conflict not needed since the others could've been filled out.
I won't call it a must see but I wouldn't warn anyone off either. Take it or leave it. Hallmark has much worse to offer these days.
Andrew Walker did well of a bit awkward at first playing a 38 year old man who kinda acted like a 22 year old kid. But he got better enough as it went along. The actress who played Prudence had to grow on me but when she did in liked her well enough.
The story was simplistic and predictable but that's not always a problem. The villains were cartoonish and unnecessary. A conflict not needed since the others could've been filled out.
I won't call it a must see but I wouldn't warn anyone off either. Take it or leave it. Hallmark has much worse to offer these days.
I did not like the tone of this story. The commoner coming in and saving the day might have been a nice story. And he does keep triumphing in almost everything he does including showing up an experienced horseman even though his only riding experience seems to only be riding a mechanical bull. That was a little too much.
The son of a Duke is automatically a Lord and I think has the title Marquess. Yet the cousin constantly insults him. Would he get away with that in front of a group?
The story goes about how you'd expect. The cousin who is the alternate heir becomes the villain. Two relationships develop. The potential romance is rushed because of everything else going on. The story makes a point of a potential problem there and also rushes dealing with it.
The acting is OK, but not great. The dialogue is mostly bland with maybe one or two good lines.
Like the movie, The Royal We, from the previous week on Hallmark, there is an epilogue where the three royal movies of March 2025 are tied together. It was clever in that one, but seemed forced and abrupt in this one.
The son of a Duke is automatically a Lord and I think has the title Marquess. Yet the cousin constantly insults him. Would he get away with that in front of a group?
The story goes about how you'd expect. The cousin who is the alternate heir becomes the villain. Two relationships develop. The potential romance is rushed because of everything else going on. The story makes a point of a potential problem there and also rushes dealing with it.
The acting is OK, but not great. The dialogue is mostly bland with maybe one or two good lines.
Like the movie, The Royal We, from the previous week on Hallmark, there is an epilogue where the three royal movies of March 2025 are tied together. It was clever in that one, but seemed forced and abrupt in this one.
7.7 stars.
I anticipated this Hallmark would be a bit better than it turned out however, it still did not disappoint. I feel that the story is a bit slow at times, somehow the characters weren't as lively as expected, the the mood wasn't as exuberant as some other royal romances. That feeling of expectation, leading up to the final romantic encounter, it was somewhat absent. The leads don't have quite the chemistry that is generally considered the bread and butter of an exceptional romance. On the other hand, I actually laughed a few times-a very rare reaction to Hallmark romances.
However, the overall experience was fine. I would say this film falls a bit short of greatness in several different categories. It's one of those slightly above average Hallmark movies, perhaps a 7.1, but since I really like all the actors and their personalities grow on you after a while, it's elevated to a 7.7. Anything 7.5 through 7.7 I feel like watching again in 2-5 years, depending on my mood at the time. Generally, I rate based on my initial impression, "do I want to see this again in the next couple years, five years, or maybe revisit this one in ten years to never?" If the answer is five years, then my rating is generally 7.5 - 7.6. I think I might be in the mood for 'The Reluctant Royal' in 3 years-just a hunch. It's a strict system, because those unfortunate 7.4's I will probably never deign to watch again, but I must be true to the system or I'll be wasting precious time rewatching average films-time that should be allocated to new releases and favorites.
I anticipated this Hallmark would be a bit better than it turned out however, it still did not disappoint. I feel that the story is a bit slow at times, somehow the characters weren't as lively as expected, the the mood wasn't as exuberant as some other royal romances. That feeling of expectation, leading up to the final romantic encounter, it was somewhat absent. The leads don't have quite the chemistry that is generally considered the bread and butter of an exceptional romance. On the other hand, I actually laughed a few times-a very rare reaction to Hallmark romances.
However, the overall experience was fine. I would say this film falls a bit short of greatness in several different categories. It's one of those slightly above average Hallmark movies, perhaps a 7.1, but since I really like all the actors and their personalities grow on you after a while, it's elevated to a 7.7. Anything 7.5 through 7.7 I feel like watching again in 2-5 years, depending on my mood at the time. Generally, I rate based on my initial impression, "do I want to see this again in the next couple years, five years, or maybe revisit this one in ten years to never?" If the answer is five years, then my rating is generally 7.5 - 7.6. I think I might be in the mood for 'The Reluctant Royal' in 3 years-just a hunch. It's a strict system, because those unfortunate 7.4's I will probably never deign to watch again, but I must be true to the system or I'll be wasting precious time rewatching average films-time that should be allocated to new releases and favorites.
Hallmark seems, with this movie, (and a few others recently) to have gotten back to what they did best before the whole Hallmark/Great American flap happened. The movie is fun, Andrew is is rare form and it was genuinely fun! Enjoy! The female lead is also very good. She seems to have jumped right into the Hallmark world and "nailed it". The scenery and even the old car What was it? A Triumph? (note the right hand drive!) add a level of believe ability that just adds to the quality of the movie. The only thing that irked me (just a bit) was the hair color application for Andrew...a little, I don't know... weird? Loved it! Keep it up Hallmark!
I have to say this is one of the best Hallmark movies I've seen in a long time. I had to double check that it actually was a Hallmark movie. Loveable characters, some well placed humour- it's really enjoyable. Andrew Walker is excellent in this and yes, he really does his own singing. It's not a musical but there are a couple of short songs in it
Love the story line.
In so many of these movies the supposedly romantic closed mouth kiss in the big finale is so unnatural I sometimes wonder if the actors can tolerate each. Not the case in this one. What a pleasant change to the phony end in many others.
Great show and the acting makes all the difference. Andrew Walker makes all the difference in the world to the quality of this movie.
In so many of these movies the supposedly romantic closed mouth kiss in the big finale is so unnatural I sometimes wonder if the actors can tolerate each. Not the case in this one. What a pleasant change to the phony end in many others.
Great show and the acting makes all the difference. Andrew Walker makes all the difference in the world to the quality of this movie.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesAndrew Walker and his wife co-founded a juice company, which includes juice made from beets. This is a fun tie-in to Johnny's passion for making juice in this movie.
- GaffesThe movie's title is "The Reluctant Royal", but there are no royals in it. The duke is not royalty, he's just aristocracy. Only members of royal family are royal dukes, and the are referred to as "Your Royal Highness", and not "Your Grace".
- Citations
Allistair Covington-Breed: Allistair Covington-Breed of Winshere, north of Devon.
Johnny Payne: Johnny Payne, South Philly, east of Pat's Cheesesteak.
- ConnexionsReferenced in The Royal We (2025)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Un duca all'improvviso
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant