Murder Comes to Town

The stories are interesting, but the acting is terrible.

Granted, the actors are given some pretty cheesy dialogue to work with, so they're probably doing their best. It's like a bunch of 5th graders wrote a play. It takes away from the story, unfortunately, and can make it unbearable at times.

Other than the ridiculous acting, the show covers a lot of ground. I do think it's hilarious when they talk like a town is in the middle of nowhere, even though it's maybe 15 minutes from a major city. I understand it's for dramatic effect, so I give that a pass. I do enjoy learning a bit about small towns I haven't heard of before.

The show paints a vivid picture of the events without revealing too much. It allows the viewer to create a hypothesis as to the why, what, and who done it. The actors are believable and you really feel the pain and sadness for the victims family. Your caught feeling a sense of rage towards the murderer for the often senseless act of taking another persons life. I love the voice of Joe Alaskey the narrator in the first twenty shows. Reminds me alot of Orson Welles voice and was very sorry to hear that he passed away. RIP

3 episodes in, they make the same error .... "September, 22 1993" for example. The comma is in the wrong place. How do they make such a ridiculous mistake? How many editors do they NOT have?

This is a well produced show (I personally think the re-enactments are fine) but it falls short for two reasons: neglecting the evidence and the narrator.

For example, in the last episode I watched, S3 E9, a woman is found raped and stabbed to death in her home. They point out that a strange stain is found on her shirt and they show them in the reenactment meticulously cutting it out of her shirt and bagging it. Fast forward to the end of the show, they find the culprit and he actually eventually confesses, but they NEVER addressed the stain! In an earlier episode where someone was shot to death, they never once talked about the murder weapon other than it being a rifle. Was it found, etc? Instead of spending more time on the evidence and forensics, they focus more on interviewing people saying things like "I never thought this could happen in OUR little town!".

And, the narration is just terrible. The writing and the narrator's voice is infuriatingly over the top melodramatic. It's insulting to the audience.

With what is approaching a glut of true crime shows it pays to be different. Different in focusing on small town crimes that other shows have passed by is a start. The other difference is in the telling, particularly the narration. Sounding very much like the late Paul Winfield the narrator adds a heaviness matching the horrific crimes. It may, or may not, be one's cup of tea as such. It mostly works to make the dark atmosphere however. What works the most is the way we our introduced to the persons of interest keeping one wondering into the final act without falsely creating "red herrings". The reenactments using actors is a mixed bag, but the stories are sadly compelling using some of the victims friends and family to add a element of real unease and loss.