The Lost Honour of Christopher Jefferies
- Mini-série télévisée
- 2014
- 57min
NOTE IMDb
7,9/10
3,4 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA retired teacher's tenant is murdered. He is wrongly accused of the crime, leading the police to arrest him. His life is turned upside down as he proclaims his innocence.A retired teacher's tenant is murdered. He is wrongly accused of the crime, leading the police to arrest him. His life is turned upside down as he proclaims his innocence.A retired teacher's tenant is murdered. He is wrongly accused of the crime, leading the police to arrest him. His life is turned upside down as he proclaims his innocence.
- Victoire aux 2 BAFTA Awards
- 8 victoires et 1 nomination au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
10slydon13
I had never heard of either Christopher Jefferies or the other people involved in the murder of his neighbour but then I don't read UK Tabloids.
Christopher Jefferies, is from the start, an unusual man.
When a female neighbour is murdered it appears that the police find no alternative other than to make him the prime suspect. He has (1) a Donald Trump style hair do (2) is correct (3) doesn't watch television and so is unaware of 'Strictly Come Dancing' and other elements of pop-culture and (4) speaks in a stilted fashion.
When he is arrested, he deals with the police questions with dignity. Of course, if he had had the natural reaction, they would have considered this evidence of his violent nature.
The performance echoed, for me, Toby Jones performance in 'Marvellous', of another unusual character.
The way that the media treats somebody that catches their focus becomes a huge part of the story. We could all have our lives turned inside out if newspapers printed photos of us next to headlines saying how odd we were.
Its unfair that people who are slightly odd (as we all are ) are so easily judged.
A thought provoking drama I'm glad I watched.
Christopher Jefferies, is from the start, an unusual man.
When a female neighbour is murdered it appears that the police find no alternative other than to make him the prime suspect. He has (1) a Donald Trump style hair do (2) is correct (3) doesn't watch television and so is unaware of 'Strictly Come Dancing' and other elements of pop-culture and (4) speaks in a stilted fashion.
When he is arrested, he deals with the police questions with dignity. Of course, if he had had the natural reaction, they would have considered this evidence of his violent nature.
The performance echoed, for me, Toby Jones performance in 'Marvellous', of another unusual character.
The way that the media treats somebody that catches their focus becomes a huge part of the story. We could all have our lives turned inside out if newspapers printed photos of us next to headlines saying how odd we were.
Its unfair that people who are slightly odd (as we all are ) are so easily judged.
A thought provoking drama I'm glad I watched.
Excellent acting by a great ensemble cast, but overwhelmingly by Jason Watkins, make this both a meditation on the human condition in a media saturated age, and a gently ironic portrayal of a true 'eccentric' which never descends into parody. Leaves the viewer with lots of food for thought about how our society deals with "difference", how individuals see themselves, and how lazy thinking can seduce even the best intentioned.
An acting tour de force! Extraordinary! Jason Watkins is absolutely amazing. This is a kind of exploration of character that requires the deepest understanding of the craft of acting.
This is all a true story told with care and respect about the horrifying behavior of the British Press, the terrible consequences of being falsely accused of murder, and the possibility of human beings to change, even when they are convinced they are set in their ways for life.
I highly recommend this film.
It's available on Netflix.
This is all a true story told with care and respect about the horrifying behavior of the British Press, the terrible consequences of being falsely accused of murder, and the possibility of human beings to change, even when they are convinced they are set in their ways for life.
I highly recommend this film.
It's available on Netflix.
STAR RATING: ***** Saturday Night **** Friday Night *** Friday Morning ** Sunday Night * Monday Morning
In the cold, frosty winter of 2010, a young woman called Joanna Yeates went missing in a small English suburb, only for her body to be found buried in the snow on Christmas Day. Without any solid, firm evidence, the finger of suspicion pointed straight away at Christopher Jeffries (Jason Watkins), Joanna's reclusive, eccentric landlord, who had a reputation as a 'local weirdo.' Before long, he had been arrested and questioned under caution in connection with the murder, only to be released from remand when a demanding legal counsel highlighted the lack of hard proof which saw him freed. But Jeffries had already been a subject of trial by media, with the various tabloid rags ripping him to shreds and attacking his character, before the real killer was finally caught. There then followed a determined legal effort with the same council to bring the press to charge on their conduct, with Jeffries even being invited to add his voice to the Leveson Inquiry.
We like to think of Britain, certainly in modern times, as an enlightened, understanding, tolerant society, where those that are different and don't quite fit in to the norm are, if not always included, at least respected and left to live their lives without any undue harassment. It's horrific to think that small mindedness, especially in times of darkness, can come to the fore and soil our national character, and yet that was the bind Christopher Jeffries found himself in. This quaint, old fashioned, unassuming man, who kept himself to himself and lived pretty obliviously to everyone else's impressions of him, was suddenly thrust in to the national spotlight, to face undue, unfounded condemnation from everyone.
This TV drama from ITV caught my eye, primarily because I remembered the case when it first happened (shows how old I'm getting when I start casting my mind back far!) and, not generally watching a lot of TV, it says a lot that I was intrigued to watch both parts. Or maybe just the character of Jeffries himself had me wondering a little. It's just as well, if that was the case, as Jeffries is literally the sole driving force of the project, occupying almost every scene , as befits documenting a guy who had very little contact with others. And so it's very pleasing that Watkins's portrayal of him is so dynamic. It's known from the magazines that he met the real life Jeffries in preparation for his role, and obviously observed his every mannerism, completely immersing himself in this character. It's an astonishing piece of method acting, and the driving force of the production.
So focused is it on Jeffries that it detrimentally leaves out a bit of subtext involving others involved in the tragedy, notably Joanna's nearest and dearest, which robs it of some more solid human drama that it could have evoked. But a central performance this invigorating can't be ignored, and neither can a surprise celebrity cameo that brings the end to life a bit. Mainly, though, it's a challenging examination of how those who are different are treated and how far we think we've come, but really haven't. ****
In the cold, frosty winter of 2010, a young woman called Joanna Yeates went missing in a small English suburb, only for her body to be found buried in the snow on Christmas Day. Without any solid, firm evidence, the finger of suspicion pointed straight away at Christopher Jeffries (Jason Watkins), Joanna's reclusive, eccentric landlord, who had a reputation as a 'local weirdo.' Before long, he had been arrested and questioned under caution in connection with the murder, only to be released from remand when a demanding legal counsel highlighted the lack of hard proof which saw him freed. But Jeffries had already been a subject of trial by media, with the various tabloid rags ripping him to shreds and attacking his character, before the real killer was finally caught. There then followed a determined legal effort with the same council to bring the press to charge on their conduct, with Jeffries even being invited to add his voice to the Leveson Inquiry.
We like to think of Britain, certainly in modern times, as an enlightened, understanding, tolerant society, where those that are different and don't quite fit in to the norm are, if not always included, at least respected and left to live their lives without any undue harassment. It's horrific to think that small mindedness, especially in times of darkness, can come to the fore and soil our national character, and yet that was the bind Christopher Jeffries found himself in. This quaint, old fashioned, unassuming man, who kept himself to himself and lived pretty obliviously to everyone else's impressions of him, was suddenly thrust in to the national spotlight, to face undue, unfounded condemnation from everyone.
This TV drama from ITV caught my eye, primarily because I remembered the case when it first happened (shows how old I'm getting when I start casting my mind back far!) and, not generally watching a lot of TV, it says a lot that I was intrigued to watch both parts. Or maybe just the character of Jeffries himself had me wondering a little. It's just as well, if that was the case, as Jeffries is literally the sole driving force of the project, occupying almost every scene , as befits documenting a guy who had very little contact with others. And so it's very pleasing that Watkins's portrayal of him is so dynamic. It's known from the magazines that he met the real life Jeffries in preparation for his role, and obviously observed his every mannerism, completely immersing himself in this character. It's an astonishing piece of method acting, and the driving force of the production.
So focused is it on Jeffries that it detrimentally leaves out a bit of subtext involving others involved in the tragedy, notably Joanna's nearest and dearest, which robs it of some more solid human drama that it could have evoked. But a central performance this invigorating can't be ignored, and neither can a surprise celebrity cameo that brings the end to life a bit. Mainly, though, it's a challenging examination of how those who are different are treated and how far we think we've come, but really haven't. ****
10Roegue
No-one living in North Bristol at the time of these events just a few years ago could support the first two somewhat negative reviews of this piece. We were there. It was our local news story become a national monster. Allowing for inevitable dramatic licence, it seemed to be an accurate reflection of how events and the shameless excesses of the rabid tabloid press conspired to vilify an admittedly eccentric, but ultimately innocent, private, local man.. The themes of press freedom vs press intrusion are slightly skimmed over as the producers and writers concentrate more on showing just how the 'freedom of the press' becomes used as an excuse to justify the insinuation of the media into the lives of private individuals under the guise of satisfying the 'public interest', whilst in reality just being a vehicle for the peddling of cheap gossip, innuendo and character assassination in the pursuit of shifting copy for profit.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesChristopher Jefferies read and approved Peter Morgan's script, and supported the project.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does The Lost Honour of Christopher Jefferies have?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Christopher Jefferies'in Çiğnenen Onuru
- Lieux de tournage
- The Bottle Yard Studios, Whitchurch Lane, Bristol, Angleterre, Royaume-Uni(studio interiors: Christopher Jefferies' flat / police interview rooms)
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée
- 57min
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant