A Year and Change

The movie is just plain bad. My GF has been a huge Jamie Chung fan, so her and a six pack convinced me to try and sit through it. First time director movies are usually awesome or horrible..and this movie was not awesome.

A good romance movie is always fun to watch, but this just seems so contrived that is is tough to watch. While the acting isn't bad at all, the direction was all over the place. The movie seems like it was shot with beauty in mind, but completing lacking in story and continuity.

It looks like this is the director's first movie, which he also wrote and produced, so maybe the story was close to his heart, but it really was just an awfully directed and written movie.

LOL - I checked the Rotten tomatoes score and it was 90%, so I'm thinking the Director and his friends/family probably voted themselves.

I don't mean to sound mad at the director, but if you're going to make me waste 90 minutes of my life and night out with my buddies, at least learn your craft.

These millennial that don't understand life yet are giving it bad reviews.. wait till you get older children and then start writing reviews.. love this movie

Always like uplifting human drama. They spoiled this one with the Hollywood required dragging the holy name of JC thru the mud - just one time as is most often the case to symbolize their disdain for pure good.

Despite the title, maybe this film had an indie production studio controlling the story, to fit a certain demographic or if it was a story born from a production studio that was developed by an in house writer, anyway it had the feel of it certainly. It's a very by the numbers, safe, predictable film, thats been done before. If you think about it, there must be 1000's if not more protagonists like this one in the real world, divorced, irresponsible, late 30's and living in the past, why is this guy, this character and his particular life written/filmed, fictional or not. He seems to fit into that generic catagory of what I said with no other interesting traits, characteristics that make you sit up and pay notice of him.

The 1st act had that cliched "music over top of showing the protagonist in the daily life" feel, putting this film into the 1000's of other generic plots like this, there was nothing in the 1st act that made the character unique and stand out. Why am I watching this guy? what makes him memorable, as i said there are 1000's of guys just like this.

Think about it this way: say you're an executive producer and I walk into your office and say "I want to do a show about a man who get's into the drug industry, works his way up the ranks making and selling drugs to become a feared druglord" you say "meh...what else you got?" I say "Let me rephrase that Mr. E.P., I want to do a show about the LAST guy on earth you'd ever imagine would get involved/be capable of making and selling crystal meth successfully, he becomes the most feared druglord in N America. He's a middle class family man, avoids conflict with others, gets pushed around by his family, when he needs more money he works a second crappy job at a car wash, that lowers his dignity dignity, is pushed around by his boss. Not only that, the person he makes drugs with is the last person in the world he could, his failed high school student, Jesse Pinkman, he makes drugs to stick it to "the man" Walter White is "the man". Jesse's deal breaker is being pushed around, Walter is going to have him wrapped around his finger, this meager, petty family man/high school teacher" now that's a compelling setup of an average man of which there are 1000's in America, thats a compelling story. I'm not trying to compare this film to Breaking Bad but I'm just showing what you can do with an average suburban, set him up, develop him in an interesting way and change him to a compelling character.

Unfortunately this film does not have such structure to setup this guy have to overcome a seemingly impossible character change. I was never wondering "how the hell is this guy ever going to get his life together, there's no way he can do it, this guy's one in a million, I have to see this play out", the generic first act setup really doesn't help the film, typical 90's dad who doesn't show up to see his son, parties too much, is told he needs to get his life together...yeah I can see where this is going and how its going to play out, soooooo many times before.

I think the film would have been more impactful if it wasn't jumping to so many areas of the protagonists life, the cousins, the sons, his love life, but have one area thats beyond bad with huge stakes attached and just build and escalate that one situation, instead there are so many areas this man tries to fix that they all feel watered down in terms of compellingness for the viewer, like if he isn't a more responsible father in some specific way he will NEVER get to see him again, ever,

show us the audience just how much the son means to him, let us experience just how much value the son is to him at some point so we can experience the stakes too, show don't tell writer and director. I never once felt that this kid means the world to the protagonist, as I didn't viscerally experience that happen. Lots of telling though in the film.

How do I know these people in the protagonists life mean a lot if you dont show it? bad writing, directing. Instead we have cookie cutter plot points that miss the point of how to deliver compelling stakes for a man's life, shame.

One last little nit pick. What was with the protagonist not buying beer in the opening scenes, why couldn't he get beer? he has a truck and cash? the shops arent closed because his ex just came from the store with beer? such bad writing and directing:

EXT. LIQUOR STORE. EVENING

Guy pulls up to store front in his van as the owner lowers the shutters. Guy races to the store front. GUY Hey, can I just run in quick and get a pack of beers, heres $20

OWNER Sorry man, everywheres closing, EVERYWHERE, its new years eve!

done, sorted. How easy was that?

You can tell from the start, that the script and the movie itself were very ambitious projects, that must have been dear to the director - but they never truly realized their potential.

As with a lot of movie debuts, this one lacks focus, because the director didn't have the guts to "kill your darlings". So instead of telling a focused story with one genre in mind, the movie turns into a couple of them: First a romance, then a family drama, then overcoming alcoholism, back to romance, then becoming a crime story, then back to family drama, back to another family drama, back to romance, back to a crime story, back to overcoming trauma...and so on. It just tries so heard, to squeeze everything into the 90 minutes it's got.

Also because of that, nothing is ever build up or being foreshadowed, leading to every dramatic action being little more than an unrealistic, forced turn of events.

The result is a tangled mess of stories, where none of the loose threads ever satisfyingly tie into one another.

The actors are really trying their best, but would've needed a lot more direction. And lastly, the lead gives such a wooden performance with just one(!) expression, that I increasingly felt like I was watching an SNL-skit where Kyle Mooney(!) was trying to act sincerely. For real, compare Bryan Greenberg and Kyle Mooney: They look and sound alike A LOT.

I really tried to give this movie a pass because of the premise - but unfortunately, the result is not only a lackluster, but a bad film.

Sorry guys, thanks for trying though.