Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueWhen a charming house guest arrives at a remote castle, the delicate dynamic between a neglectful husband, his innocent bride Cherry, and their devoted maid Hero, is thrown into chaos.When a charming house guest arrives at a remote castle, the delicate dynamic between a neglectful husband, his innocent bride Cherry, and their devoted maid Hero, is thrown into chaos.When a charming house guest arrives at a remote castle, the delicate dynamic between a neglectful husband, his innocent bride Cherry, and their devoted maid Hero, is thrown into chaos.
- Réalisation
- Scénaristes
- Stars
- Récompenses
- 4 nominations au total
Avis à la une
I'm not sure how else to put it, but this felt like kid's movie, a children's fairytale, something you'd stack next to Cinderella or Goldilocks, except made for adults. That mismatch created a weird disconnect for me. It's like a Disney movie, but with sexual tension... and when you mix Disney-style acting and innocence with horniness, just feels weird.
The story and themes also seemed like a mash-up of plots you've seen before, without adding anything new. Almost everything felt like a rehash of ideas other films have already executed better.
What saves it from being unbearable is that the movie seems somewhat self aware, vibes-wise. It never takes itself too seriously; you see that in the acting, the dialogue, and even the production design. At times, the whole thing looked like a music video extended. You know when an artist turns a 3 minute song into a 7 minute short film? Imagine if Sabrina Carpenter or Charli XCX made a 90 minute version of that. If that sounds appealing, this might be your movie.
I personally struggled to connect with it, especially with the messaging, which boiled down to "Man bad. Men hate women because secretly gay. Woman love woman." It felt like when actors become directors and make their passion project... except here it feels like a musician wrote a film between album releases.
The characters felt distant. You don't need to relate to a character's situation for a story to work, but you do need to feel something for them - and I didn't. It lacked that engaging quality, the kind that allows me to enjoy a gay romcom or a female-centered drama even though I'm neither; and didn't even seem interested in creating it. Like watching the Queen's gambit, I don't care about chess I loved that.
The weak portrayal of the male characters also undermined the female leads. They were so cartoonishly dumb and shallow. Like watching a superhero whose only adversaries are pathetic, there's no real tension or satisfaction in their victory. Here, the only male characters with any sense and morals(i.e. The guards), were relegated way into the background. Every male character with significant screen time/dialogue was not only unlikable, but also shallow, uninteresting, with paper thin personality. In contrast, the women were written with greater depth and intelligence, which made the film's central conflicts feel unbalanced and unconvincing. Like that's who's beating you?
It brought to mind Kang the Conqueror being beat by ants, but in reverse; a victory feels hollow when the opposition is so clearly inferior. There are stories where the "oppressed by the lesser" trope works, like King Kong in chains, Eleven in Stranger Things, the Iron Giant, Samson, Mystique in X-Men; but in those cases the antagonists have actual leverage. Here, the men don't; they're just literal idiots. Made their role as oppressors feel implausible and dramatically inert. So the "victories" feel underwhelming.
I didn't necessarily hate the film, but I also didn't enjoy it. The only thing that kept it tolerable was that it didn't take itself too seriously.
Still, I was massively disappointed especially after waiting in a long line for the letterboxd screening. Luckily, I saw 2 movies last night and the other was much better, so the trip to the theater wasn't a total waste. Honestly should've just gone home after "The Holiday."
The story and themes also seemed like a mash-up of plots you've seen before, without adding anything new. Almost everything felt like a rehash of ideas other films have already executed better.
What saves it from being unbearable is that the movie seems somewhat self aware, vibes-wise. It never takes itself too seriously; you see that in the acting, the dialogue, and even the production design. At times, the whole thing looked like a music video extended. You know when an artist turns a 3 minute song into a 7 minute short film? Imagine if Sabrina Carpenter or Charli XCX made a 90 minute version of that. If that sounds appealing, this might be your movie.
I personally struggled to connect with it, especially with the messaging, which boiled down to "Man bad. Men hate women because secretly gay. Woman love woman." It felt like when actors become directors and make their passion project... except here it feels like a musician wrote a film between album releases.
The characters felt distant. You don't need to relate to a character's situation for a story to work, but you do need to feel something for them - and I didn't. It lacked that engaging quality, the kind that allows me to enjoy a gay romcom or a female-centered drama even though I'm neither; and didn't even seem interested in creating it. Like watching the Queen's gambit, I don't care about chess I loved that.
The weak portrayal of the male characters also undermined the female leads. They were so cartoonishly dumb and shallow. Like watching a superhero whose only adversaries are pathetic, there's no real tension or satisfaction in their victory. Here, the only male characters with any sense and morals(i.e. The guards), were relegated way into the background. Every male character with significant screen time/dialogue was not only unlikable, but also shallow, uninteresting, with paper thin personality. In contrast, the women were written with greater depth and intelligence, which made the film's central conflicts feel unbalanced and unconvincing. Like that's who's beating you?
It brought to mind Kang the Conqueror being beat by ants, but in reverse; a victory feels hollow when the opposition is so clearly inferior. There are stories where the "oppressed by the lesser" trope works, like King Kong in chains, Eleven in Stranger Things, the Iron Giant, Samson, Mystique in X-Men; but in those cases the antagonists have actual leverage. Here, the men don't; they're just literal idiots. Made their role as oppressors feel implausible and dramatically inert. So the "victories" feel underwhelming.
I didn't necessarily hate the film, but I also didn't enjoy it. The only thing that kept it tolerable was that it didn't take itself too seriously.
Still, I was massively disappointed especially after waiting in a long line for the letterboxd screening. Luckily, I saw 2 movies last night and the other was much better, so the trip to the theater wasn't a total waste. Honestly should've just gone home after "The Holiday."
In a world where women are not allowed to read, write or seemingly even think for themselves a young woman called Cherry (Maika Monroe) has her 'faithfulness' tested by her husband Jerome (Amir El-Masry) by being left alone with a handsome young rake called Manfred (Nicholas Galitzine). With only her (lesbian?) maid Hero (Emma Corrin) for protection will she and her 'honour' survive for 100 days as the dick gets closer and closer? Writer/director Julian Jackman's 2025 feature film is based on Isabel Greenberg's graphic novel, being a satirical women's liberation reimagining of 'One Thousand and One Nights', and comedy of sexual politics and relationships set in a world with rampant misogyny (and a bird theme) running through it, whose oppression and marginalisation of women seems eerily similar to a planet which is already known to us. Your reminded vaguely of the films of Yorgos Lanthimos in a generally effective, nice to look and at the end moving fantasy imagining of some of the trials women have had to go through, seemingly because of the insecurities and shortcomings of certain men. And of course in this world that isn't a fantasy.
Saw 100 Nights of Hero at an early screening as part of the Regal Mystery Movie. The film focuses on a patriarchal society that uses religion to control women and all aspects of life. It's a tale as old as time, but here, they worship Birdman. Unfortunately, the film can't gain enough steam to take off.
Positives!
+Excellent use of stained glass lighting to express emotions of scenes.
+Cast is sufficient in acting.
+Interesting costume choices.
+Fitting orchestral electronica score.
Negatives!
-Themes are very surface level.
-Lens flare effect on ALL candles!
-Plot jumps between main story and stories within stories without much connection.
-Feels like a school project.
-Scenes are cluttered with objects. Felt like a music video set.
100 Nights of Hero is Okay at best. It feels like a teenage introduction to dealing with the patriarchy and feminism. It wasn't boring, but was certainly unremarkable.
-GremlinLord615!
-Full Review on Youtube!
Positives!
+Excellent use of stained glass lighting to express emotions of scenes.
+Cast is sufficient in acting.
+Interesting costume choices.
+Fitting orchestral electronica score.
Negatives!
-Themes are very surface level.
-Lens flare effect on ALL candles!
-Plot jumps between main story and stories within stories without much connection.
-Feels like a school project.
-Scenes are cluttered with objects. Felt like a music video set.
100 Nights of Hero is Okay at best. It feels like a teenage introduction to dealing with the patriarchy and feminism. It wasn't boring, but was certainly unremarkable.
-GremlinLord615!
-Full Review on Youtube!
Congratulations for making a sapphic book about a man (Galitzine, who hams it up way too much) They ruined it by not sticking to the book and we all know the only reason Charli is in there is because they thought it would build up the hype. Why they thought it would be a good idea releasing this to 823 theatres (which is NOT a limited release) is beyond me. This is nothing more than a vanity project aiming for awards and wildly missing the mark. The acting is mid and the chemistry non existent. It's just bland. Skip.
This was by far the worst acting, plot, sound quality, and cinematography I have ever seen. I'm just thankful it was a mystery movie night to not have wasted more money.
What was up with the helmets, and cheap costumes and weird expressions. It was so bad you see the main actor lick his lips like a cheesy stripper trying to act sexy.
What was up with the helmets, and cheap costumes and weird expressions. It was so bad you see the main actor lick his lips like a cheesy stripper trying to act sexy.
Le saviez-vous
- Bandes originalesOnly Alive
Performed by Purity Ring
Written by Megan James & Corin Roddick
Licensed Courtesy of Purity Ring
Published by Purity Ring
Copyright 2025
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
The Year in Posters
The Year in Posters
From Hurry Up Tomorrow to Highest 2 Lowest, take a look back at some of our favorite posters of 2025.
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- 100 ночей Хиро
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 324 768 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 250 701 $US
- 7 déc. 2025
- Montant brut mondial
- 324 768 $US
- Durée
- 1h 31min(91 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant






