Face to Face with Scott Peterson

The filmmaker is OBSESSED with Scott and his family. This is the third (very biased) "documentary" she has made about Scott, always portraying him as a victim. It would be interesting if she made one documentary with the other perspective, but no, she's crazy about Scott. Just like Scott's weird sister in law; she's so in love with him to the point of being disturbing. Not even Scott's brother fights so much for him, but this woman, seriously... she's crazy. These two women are unreliable and obviously close friends. I will never be able to believe something that's made by them. I would watch other documentary about Scott if they weren't involved.

Not very compelling. Scott Peterson still should not speak in his own defense. He comes off as not genuine and dismissive. Honestly all of the circumstantial evidence presented in the trial and other documentaries is very convincing. The people in this documentary also provide holes and other possible circumstantial evidence that would support Scott's innocence but it is not very strong. The timing of Scott telling (lying) Amber Frey that his wife was dead, his purchase of a boat (that no one knew of), his examination of tide tables, where he said he went "fishing" and where the bodies were found is beyond coincidental. His behavior particularly his continued communication with Amber Frey while the search was still going for his wife is suspicious.

Waste of time, they obviously made this documentary on the heels of Lacy's documentary on Netflix. Scott is seen smiling throughout the series smiling and very nonchalant which rubbed me the wrong way. Also, when asked who killed Lacy, he blames the two men for that one burglary that happened across the street, how convenient to blame others when reasonable doubt clearly points at Scott Peterson. Then they have a so-called journalist who thinks he's a detective and says that Scott didn't have a motive ... um hello, they forget about Amber Frei?! This so-called documentary was biased toward Scott. Then they try and say that Lacy was abducted in a van that was found burned, even though there was zero evidence of Lacy's DNA. The reach is real with one. I wish I could take back the hours I spent watching this mess. Lastly, may Scott continue to rot in prison. R.i.p Lacy and Connor.

You would think after getting a 3.7 star rating on their previous Casey Anthony docuseries that they would stop glorifying killers. Clearly not.

Yet another bias Peacock docuseries that disrespects victims. This doc is basically a retelling of the 2017 A&E doc. Once again it's Scott's sister in law running the show, misleading viewers, and bold faced lies. She and the rest of his family are out of touch with reality. Lookup an online list of every piece of evidence against him and you'll see the massive list of "coincidences", which the family believes is just pure bad luck and poor ol' Scott is innocent.

Skip this watch the new very well made Netflix one, "American Murder: Laci Peterson." This one is based in reality (which is likely why Scott refused to partake in it, instead going along with this unbelievable story, which is a slap in the face for Laci, Conner, and her family. Peacock did the same thing for Casey Anthony, and seems that that their 3.7/10 rating for that one would make them stop, they did it again. Horrible.

Heartbreaking case for the family of Laci and Conner. Life altering event for then naive Amber Frey, who is an imperfect person trying to do the right thing. Scott gives me the ick, doesn't mean he's guilty, although a lot of circumstantial evidence points towards his guilt. While Mr. Peterson is an adulterer, this does not mean he murdered anyone. Logically, it was a case built on circumstantial evidence. This documentary does reflect the possibility of reasonable doubt in Peterson's conviction and trial by media; however, it ends without a conclusion to the DNA testing as requested by the LA innocence project as pending. While the decision to take Mr Peterson off Death Row appears legally valid as the conviction was based on circumstantial evidence, will be curious what the DNA testing will show. I also find it interesting so many of the DNA requests were denied and who isn't curious about the burnt out van, so there is culpability on behalf of the prosecution as well. Mixed feelings on this, agree with overturning the death penalty, but unlike the Netflix documentary that was released days before, there is no input from the friends and family of the victims. Just Scott, still sending out the ick vibes.