Face to Face with Scott Peterson

Where are the probing questions for Scott? The documentary doesn't ask Scott any questions that really matter or do much to prove that he is innocent. So he says he is an a-hole big deal we know that! Why would you leave your wife on Christmas Eve and pregnant no less to go fishing? Why would you lie from beginning to end and tell people you told your wife about the affair and she was ok about it! Really? There are very things that are very similar with Laci Patterson documentary but this one is clearly slanted towards Scott and not very impartial. Scott came off just as unbelievable then and as he does now.

Not very compelling. Scott Peterson still should not speak in his own defense. He comes off as not genuine and dismissive. Honestly all of the circumstantial evidence presented in the trial and other documentaries is very convincing. The people in this documentary also provide holes and other possible circumstantial evidence that would support Scott's innocence but it is not very strong. The timing of Scott telling (lying) Amber Frey that his wife was dead, his purchase of a boat (that no one knew of), his examination of tide tables, where he said he went "fishing" and where the bodies were found is beyond coincidental. His behavior particularly his continued communication with Amber Frey while the search was still going for his wife is suspicious.

Heartbreaking case for the family of Laci and Conner. Life altering event for then naive Amber Frey, who is an imperfect person trying to do the right thing. Scott gives me the ick, doesn't mean he's guilty, although a lot of circumstantial evidence points towards his guilt. While Mr. Peterson is an adulterer, this does not mean he murdered anyone. Logically, it was a case built on circumstantial evidence. This documentary does reflect the possibility of reasonable doubt in Peterson's conviction and trial by media; however, it ends without a conclusion to the DNA testing as requested by the LA innocence project as pending. While the decision to take Mr Peterson off Death Row appears legally valid as the conviction was based on circumstantial evidence, will be curious what the DNA testing will show. I also find it interesting so many of the DNA requests were denied and who isn't curious about the burnt out van, so there is culpability on behalf of the prosecution as well. Mixed feelings on this, agree with overturning the death penalty, but unlike the Netflix documentary that was released days before, there is no input from the friends and family of the victims. Just Scott, still sending out the ick vibes.

Scott Peterson was is guilty, no question. He like thousands of husbands and boyfriends with "missing" partners just not that concerned. Oh yeah she is gone, I'll eat pizza, not look for her, not try her cell phone, lie about cheating, lie about going golfing.. He like so many of these scumbags need to go to prison and stay there. Believe the dogs over a sociopath. If it were me.... And if one of my daughters was missing.. I would be door to door.., and if the bf or husband didn't put all effort in the search, water boarding would be the least of his problems. Can't believe Peacock would give this coward any time.

The filmmaker is OBSESSED with Scott and his family. This is the third (very biased) "documentary" she has made about Scott, always portraying him as a victim. It would be interesting if she made one documentary with the other perspective, but no, she's crazy about Scott. Just like Scott's weird sister in law; she's so in love with him to the point of being disturbing. Not even Scott's brother fights so much for him, but this woman, seriously... she's crazy. These two women are unreliable and obviously close friends. I will never be able to believe something that's made by them. I would watch other documentary about Scott if they weren't involved.