Des histoires choquantes de trahison, de violence et de tromperie à travers des témoignages, des images de bodycam et des reconstitutions. Il expose les réalités dérangeantes de relations pa... Tout lireDes histoires choquantes de trahison, de violence et de tromperie à travers des témoignages, des images de bodycam et des reconstitutions. Il expose les réalités dérangeantes de relations passées monstrueuses.Des histoires choquantes de trahison, de violence et de tromperie à travers des témoignages, des images de bodycam et des reconstitutions. Il expose les réalités dérangeantes de relations passées monstrueuses.
- Casting principal
- Casting principal
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
The first episode is fantastic. That could even be a movie by itself. The second episode is pretty good too. It's extremely frustrating at times but man, what a masterpiece of psychopathy.
From there I was hooked, but then slammed to reality. The third episode is an extremely lonely introvert who makes bad decisions. It's not a bad episode necessarily, but not that interesting and ultimately kind of aggravating to watch.
By the fourth episode, you kind of feel they all just deserve each other. I don't want to sound cold hearted, but in the context of the show, they just aren't as interesting nor out of nowhere.
I'd probably watch the first two, skip the rest.
From there I was hooked, but then slammed to reality. The third episode is an extremely lonely introvert who makes bad decisions. It's not a bad episode necessarily, but not that interesting and ultimately kind of aggravating to watch.
By the fourth episode, you kind of feel they all just deserve each other. I don't want to sound cold hearted, but in the context of the show, they just aren't as interesting nor out of nowhere.
I'd probably watch the first two, skip the rest.
After the success of Worst roommate ever, it was pretty obvious that more would follow, Worst ex was the logical choice.
It could have been a really cheap and vacuous follow up series, but it's good, definitely well worth watching. If you're into real life crime documentaries, then I think you'll enjoy this one.
This first series is made up of four episodes, four fairly different, but equally interesting and shocking storylines, but it was Killing for custody that shocked me most of all, talk about a harrowing watch.
It's nicely made, with interesting, first hand interviews, and the obvious 'Worst' accompanying animations.
One thing that seems apparent throughout, failings by the authorities, it seems in most of the stories, victims are let down by the powers that be, especially Seemona.
I wonder what's next, worst barista ever, worst dog walker ever? I'd be down for that. You know what happens when these guys get a formula that works.
7/10.
It could have been a really cheap and vacuous follow up series, but it's good, definitely well worth watching. If you're into real life crime documentaries, then I think you'll enjoy this one.
This first series is made up of four episodes, four fairly different, but equally interesting and shocking storylines, but it was Killing for custody that shocked me most of all, talk about a harrowing watch.
It's nicely made, with interesting, first hand interviews, and the obvious 'Worst' accompanying animations.
One thing that seems apparent throughout, failings by the authorities, it seems in most of the stories, victims are let down by the powers that be, especially Seemona.
I wonder what's next, worst barista ever, worst dog walker ever? I'd be down for that. You know what happens when these guys get a formula that works.
7/10.
Ignore the bad reviews. This programme is good and highlighting the absolute horrendous problem of domestic violence and those people who think that women are just a commodity to be used.
Yes, some of the scenes are dramatised for the programme this helps tell the stories of those victims who have survived such terrible ordeals.
There should be more conversation about how men treat women and how some law enforcement agencies will side with the perpetrator rather than the victim.
Other comments have politicised this sort of show, which is not acceptable. Domestic violence is a warrant and should be called out regardless.
Yes, some of the scenes are dramatised for the programme this helps tell the stories of those victims who have survived such terrible ordeals.
There should be more conversation about how men treat women and how some law enforcement agencies will side with the perpetrator rather than the victim.
Other comments have politicised this sort of show, which is not acceptable. Domestic violence is a warrant and should be called out regardless.
Watching this program will make you want to scream at your television. Not to sound too judgmental, but some of the women in these episodes are just far too trusting and just horrible judges of character. How many times do you need to get abused or beaten before you realize a guy is bad news?
The first episode in particular also shines a terrible spotlight on law enforcement in Nevada and Oregon. The utter incompetence is just enraging. The fact that Ben Foster was able to threaten and abuse women over and over again is a disgraceful failure by the legal system. And watching the almost slapstick antics of the cops in Oregon trying to apprehend Foster was just theater of the absurd.
The first episode in particular also shines a terrible spotlight on law enforcement in Nevada and Oregon. The utter incompetence is just enraging. The fact that Ben Foster was able to threaten and abuse women over and over again is a disgraceful failure by the legal system. And watching the almost slapstick antics of the cops in Oregon trying to apprehend Foster was just theater of the absurd.
It's a finely made documentary series, with quite eerie and disturbing topic.
There's just one problem with it, and it's how producers of this documentary reasoned; if you have 30 minutes worth of a story, and you have a contract for a one hour episode, then by any sanity, you should just tell TWO of such stories to fill the time.
What did producers do? Create 30 minutes of cartoons to simply waste viewer's time.
Now, if the 30-minute story is not very good, and it's 30 minutes long, typical person would go, "meh, it was just 30 minutes, anyway". But if it's dragged out to a hour, not only did the person watch a poor story, but they also lost entire hour of their lifetime for no good reason.
So, while it's a fine documentary, everything's dragged out about twice the length it should be. Which is just utterly annoying.
I do not know why people who work for Netflix do this. One would assume that if you get a contract from major streaming platform, you'd try your best to be sane and reasonable and deliver a top product.
Guess I don't know something.
There's just one problem with it, and it's how producers of this documentary reasoned; if you have 30 minutes worth of a story, and you have a contract for a one hour episode, then by any sanity, you should just tell TWO of such stories to fill the time.
What did producers do? Create 30 minutes of cartoons to simply waste viewer's time.
Now, if the 30-minute story is not very good, and it's 30 minutes long, typical person would go, "meh, it was just 30 minutes, anyway". But if it's dragged out to a hour, not only did the person watch a poor story, but they also lost entire hour of their lifetime for no good reason.
So, while it's a fine documentary, everything's dragged out about twice the length it should be. Which is just utterly annoying.
I do not know why people who work for Netflix do this. One would assume that if you get a contract from major streaming platform, you'd try your best to be sane and reasonable and deliver a top product.
Guess I don't know something.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant