Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueDr. Peter Poole has contracted cancer, so he decides to use himself as a guinea pig for a serum to cure the disease. But the serum turns out to have extremely nasty side effects and causes P... Tout lireDr. Peter Poole has contracted cancer, so he decides to use himself as a guinea pig for a serum to cure the disease. But the serum turns out to have extremely nasty side effects and causes Peter to go lethally around the bend.Dr. Peter Poole has contracted cancer, so he decides to use himself as a guinea pig for a serum to cure the disease. But the serum turns out to have extremely nasty side effects and causes Peter to go lethally around the bend.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Allison Egan
- Olivia
- (as Allison Fitzgerald)
Dustin Mills
- Itchy
- (voix)
- (as Dustin Wayde Mills)
Avis à la une
Independent micro-budget director Dustin Mills rips off David Cronenberg's The Fly something rotten for Skinless, chucking in a smidge of The Incredible Melting Man for good measure. Working with what must be a fraction of The Fly's catering budget, Mills delivers a cheap and cheerful concoction of bargain basement gore effects and gratuitous nudity that should prove moderately entertaining if you're not averse to no-frills homemade horror.
Brandon Salkil plays the Seth Brundle character, geneticist Peter Peele, who tests his experimental cancer treatment on himself; initially successful, the treatment ultimately has unexpected side effects, Peele's flesh liquifying, the scientist turning into a hideous deranged monster. This is not good news for Dr. Alice Cross (Erin R. Ryan), the woman Peele is obsessed with...
The majority of Mills' $2,000 budget appears to have been spent on fake blood, KY jelly, and latex - the film is very goopy. I can't imagine much was left in the coffers to pay the performers, so one assumes that the cast are all friends of Mills happy to muck in for free, which would explain the less than stellar acting. Not that great performances are necessary for this type of thing: Mills aim is to deliver plenty of splattery effects and to get the women in the film to strip off, and he succeeds in both.
In the grand scheme of things, Skinless is not great -- extremely derivative (Salkil even twitches like Goldblum) and technically crude -- but considering the amount of money that the film was made for, it's a marvel that it is as entertaining as it is. A movie to crack open a few beers to...
5.5/10, rounded up to 6 for IMDb.
Brandon Salkil plays the Seth Brundle character, geneticist Peter Peele, who tests his experimental cancer treatment on himself; initially successful, the treatment ultimately has unexpected side effects, Peele's flesh liquifying, the scientist turning into a hideous deranged monster. This is not good news for Dr. Alice Cross (Erin R. Ryan), the woman Peele is obsessed with...
The majority of Mills' $2,000 budget appears to have been spent on fake blood, KY jelly, and latex - the film is very goopy. I can't imagine much was left in the coffers to pay the performers, so one assumes that the cast are all friends of Mills happy to muck in for free, which would explain the less than stellar acting. Not that great performances are necessary for this type of thing: Mills aim is to deliver plenty of splattery effects and to get the women in the film to strip off, and he succeeds in both.
In the grand scheme of things, Skinless is not great -- extremely derivative (Salkil even twitches like Goldblum) and technically crude -- but considering the amount of money that the film was made for, it's a marvel that it is as entertaining as it is. A movie to crack open a few beers to...
5.5/10, rounded up to 6 for IMDb.
I have to admit, caught this on a free AD-based streaming service & had expectations on the floor when I saw it was filmed on video and the sound was "echoey" like some cheap camcorder production...I gave it a chance & have to admit, I enjoyed it! I'll name name some cons that will turn off many off the bat, its obviously done on the cheap ($2,000?! Wow), the main actor is serviceable at best, and it borrows way too much off of The Fly '86, other then that, its a short little horror with plenty of gore & nudity (full bush shot) and some decent horror drama!
For the amount of money Dustin put into making this movie, I have seen nothing comparable! It was easily the best low/no budget movie I have ever seen! I'm honestly not trying to hype this movie for Dustin, I'm trying to tell people that this is seriously worth your time. If you are into low budget horror at all, you will LOVE this film. If you aren't, this film may just be what gets you started on it. If you like blood, nudity, gore, nudity, blood, or nudity, then you will definitely not be disappointed. The acting is stellar for local actors as well. Erin R. Ryan and Brandon Salkil put forth more effort than a lot of people I've seen in huge Hollywood films. I'm not saying they should win an Academy Award, but they put forth a lot of effort.
Please do yourself a favor and at least rent this movie. If not, buy it digitally or physically. I've seen it 4x since its release not even 2 weeks ago and it is still awesome! :)
Please do yourself a favor and at least rent this movie. If not, buy it digitally or physically. I've seen it 4x since its release not even 2 weeks ago and it is still awesome! :)
For an estimated budget of only 2,000 dollars, it has some pretty good practical effects. There are many scenes that are downright nasty and visually impressive, but there are a few scenes that look like they used walmart masks for gore effects. The acting is very spotty as you would expect with a low budget movie with many scenes being incredibly awkward, but there are a few great moments - especially some of Erin R. Ryans scenes as she shines in some moments throughout this movie. I think my biggest complaint for this movie and many movies in this low budget category is the camera work, with some scenes and design choices making the movie ugly to look at and very unprofessional at times - especially with some frames cutting back and forth near the end. Despite many flaws, the overall story is pretty good and it never made me lose my interest during the 1 hour 20 minute run time, and it also had some funny moments. This movie has many flaws, but these flaws don't necessarily ruin the movie as a whole. If you enjoy body horror movies like the fly and you accept the flaws associated with low budget horror movies, you will really enjoy this movie.
I foolishly thought I would be able to have this movie on in the background while I worked on another project. How mistaken I was; I couldn't stop watching. The actors and actresses went above and beyond to make this an unforgettable film. There were some very creative elements at work in this production. I can't believe this movie was shot for a mere $2000.00. The actors must have worked for free. Talk about dedication to your art! Someone give this director/production team/actors and actresses some real capital to work with and let's see what else they can come up with that I'm sure will be as entertaining as this little bit of cinematic joy. It proves that a substantial budget is not required to make a great film. I recommend this one for its sheer creativity alone!
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesA different more theatrical version of this film was initially shot, but eventually abandoned because it was too over the top.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- The Ballad of Skinless Pete
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 2 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 400 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 168 $US
- 9 mars 2014
- Montant brut mondial
- 400 $US
- Durée
- 1h 20min(80 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant