Was there a need for a sequel to this story? Well, it's all on the foundation of director Alex Magaña. Taking advantage of the importance of the mouse and its popularity.
The same argument is repeated again, it does not contribute or provide anything more. Even if it's much worse than the previous one. Mickey Mouse 2 is a boring short film, and that really makes you think about those 3 minutes of your life.
Actress Naiya Armour performed a very controversial work, with fatal expressions and a Pyrrhic development. It is understandable from his perspective, but he takes the opportunity to get out of a short film that gets many visits.
The deaths of both this sequel and the previous, are fatal, from the time of drowning and the way in which it is carried out. None of the females try anything else to survive. Fatal.
The look of Mickey Mouse here has a slight improvement, but still does not give any memorable scare. The focus of horror and suspension is not visible at any time.
Repeat the formula of a quiet actress in one place. Lacking more mobility, good expressions and an argument that brings a beautiful experience for the viewer.
Would you take the challenge?
