49
Métascore
8 commentaires · Fourni par Metacritic.com
- 75Chicago Sun-TimesRichard RoeperChicago Sun-TimesRichard RoeperWhile these folks aren’t always the most pleasant to be around, we understand them and can relate to them, and at times feel empathy for their predicaments.
- 70VarietyStephen SaitoVarietyStephen SaitoThe film dips into the melodramatic as it inches closer to the end and choices have to be made, but if its players are revealed to be starring in a movie, they are also shown to be movie stars, making relatively mundane miseries well worth watching.
- 60The New York TimesJeannette CatsoulisThe New York TimesJeannette CatsoulisIts characters may be stressed out, but its rhythms are leisurely, the skill of the actors mostly countering the weaknesses in the script.
- 50ColliderIsabella SoaresColliderIsabella SoaresThe truth is that by the film's final moments, the audience will likely leave their viewing experience with a headache and a bitter aftertaste from all the melodrama.
- 50Los Angeles TimesRobert AbeleLos Angeles TimesRobert AbeleMildness reigns and indifference blooms. What calls out to be well seasoned — a dish with bits that are scorched and raw — is instead merely a tepid porridge.
- 38RogerEbert.comMatt Zoller SeitzRogerEbert.comMatt Zoller SeitzMillers in Marriage isn’t a science fiction movie. Which is unfortunate, because if it were, we might’ve gotten a decent explanation for why one minute of the characters’ lives makes you feel as if you’ve aged a month.
- 10TheWrapChase HutchinsonTheWrapChase HutchinsonThis void of a movie has plenty of the right pieces to work with at hand, but continually arranges them in the most blunt, least interesting manner possible. It’s a film that bolds, underlines and then shouts at you what it’s about, though never authentically earns your emotional investment.