L'Histoire de Souleymane

Souleymane's Story is a gripping and deeply human tale that sheds light on the struggles of asylum seekers in modern Paris. Directed by Boris Lojkine, the film follows Souleymane, a food delivery cyclist racing against time to prepare for a critical interview that could determine his future. In just 91 minutes, the narrative delivers an unflinching portrayal of survival, hope, and the emotional toll of uncertainty.

Abou Sangaré's performance is a revelation, capturing the vulnerability and determination of a young man caught between the harsh realities of his daily life and the weight of his dreams. The supporting cast, including Nina Meurisse, adds depth to the story, highlighting the fragile human connections Souleymane forms along the way.

Lojkine's direction is understated yet powerful, using the streets of Paris as both a backdrop and a character in itself. The cinematography immerses the viewer in the city's contrasting beauty and hostility, mirroring Souleymane's inner turmoil. The film's pacing is tight, and its realism leaves a lasting impact, compelling viewers to confront the humanity behind headlines and statistics.

Rating: 8/10 - A heartfelt and necessary exploration of resilience in the face of systemic challenges.

"Süleyman'in Hikayesi" is a captivating tale that delves into the life of Süleyman, a man whose journey is filled with trials, triumphs, and deep introspection. The narrative beautifully explores themes of resilience, love, and the search for meaning in a complex world. Süleyman's character is richly developed, making his emotional struggles and growth relatable to readers. The story is set against a vivid backdrop, which enhances the immersive experience. The author masterfully balances moments of joy and sorrow, creating a poignant and thought-provoking read that lingers in the mind long after the last page is turned. This tale is a testament to the human spirit's capacity for endurance and transformation.

A humanist film. But, overrated to overreact against the rise of national far right leaders... So many series, and plateforme movies are better than this... I doubt the actor will be able to perform again on a theatre scene playing Beckett or Moliere... The story can be written on a stamp. Some critics compare it to the 1948 bicycle thief ! Nobody will watch this film in 70 years ! More articles were published on the personnal life of the actor who wants papers to stay in France than on the storyboard itself ! This film won't change anything on a political side, so it won't compensate its weakness as a movie.

This film is a punch in the gut and frankly it should be mandatory in schools.

I rarely ever cry for movies, but felt like crying here although the flow and.the directorial angle is very matter-of-fact and realistic, not trying to unnaturally elicit emotions in the viewers.

Outstanding performance by the lead actor and the movie does a really good job at showing the different aspects of community at play here - the positive interactions and mutual help.with other asylum seekers and the.ruthless exploitation from other immigrants who have managed to successfully.achieve a legal status in France.

Saw this at the Ghent 2024 filmfestival. Filmed from so close by that it is awkward to sit through all the mishaps that our main character must go through. (This is not meant as a complaint against the filmmakers.) It seems like everyone and everything is against him. We know that there is no conspiracy against him, but his way of earning money is semi-illegal (he is not allowed to work, not yet) hence needs to do it via sub-contracting, so he carries all the risks and earns relatively little money. The camera closely following him on his delivery route, gives a compelling impression of what he must go through. Not only do his deliveries take more time than planned, it also endangers his timely arrival at the bus stop where he is transported to the shelter for the night, where he can sleep, shower and wash his clothes.

Then there is Barry, the so-called social worker, who is not very helpful either, being more interested in money than following up on his promises. He gives lots of pointers what to include in the story, pushing him to memorize as many details as possible. He says all this is required to prove the authenticity of the story why he left his country. All of that would ultimately provide a permit to stay and work in France. However, Barry does not invest enough time in proper preparations. He also insists on getting paid before he passes some necessary papers on. And what is worse, during the final interview we learn that this preparation falls flat: the very same story, including lots of details he had to learn by heart, was presented literally three times in the same week, so clearly not genuine.

The final interview runs its course in two phases. Firstly, the prepared story is told and recorded, after which it comes out that the story is certainly not his personal story. (They heard it before, even three times that week, with the exact same details.) Secondly, he gets the chance to correct and augment, and we hear the real story behind his flight, which is also added to his record. We do not hear the end result of it, however.