The Carrier

Was drawn into seeing 'The Carrier', with a cool poster/cover, a promising trailer, an intriguing premise and as someone with a general appreciation for the genre it fits under. That it was low-budget, which from frequent personal experience is rarely a good sign due to that there are so many poor ones out there, made me though apprehensive.

It is sadly however yet another film seen recently, hence some reiteration because the exact same strengths and flaws present in those films are here, that to me was incredibly disappointing considering its potential which it doesn't do anywhere near enough with. 'The Carrier' is weak with not much point to it, with so many huge flaws and doesn't do enough with its potential, which was hardly small. There is very little to recommend in 'The Carrier'.

Lets start with the positives. Some of the acting is okay considering what was given to them. The production values had atmosphere and didn't look too cheap.

'The Carrier' also starts off reasonably promisingly, it does intrigue and it does have creepiness.

Going on to the negatives, the story does feel over-stretched and some of it comes over as vague and under-explained in the last third where the film especially became duller, more predictable, more senseless and less unsettled and never gaining momentum. All the characters are too sketchy and with nowhere near enough to make one want to endear to them. Their annoying and illogical decision making and behaviours frustrates. The chemistry lacks character or punch.

Making the film feel bland and forgettable with not enough heart put into it. The sound quality is obvious and utilised cheaply (being too loud in the build ups and people's reactions) and some of the acting seemed unsure. The effects can be ropy.

Dialogue can be stilted and rambling while the pace and film lacks tightness after such an intriguing start and doesn't recover. Found too many of the supposedly shocking moments not surprising and very bland and the atmosphere dreary, due to the excessive obviousness, a lot of idiotic and vague moments and explanations and the lack of tension and suspense. Thrills are none, thanks to stodginess and excessive over-familiarity, and found myself never invested in the drama, which tended to be overacted and statically directed.

A lot of 'The Carrier' has underdeveloped plot elements and often nonsensical and confusing character motivations, while too many of the things to make you shocked are far from creative or unsettling.

Everything is unimaginative and are more odd than scary, completely failing to show any sense of dread. The thriller elements fail to thrill and are very predictable and the drama is overwrought. Some badly sagging momentum too and a lot of weirdness. The direction is leaden, got the sense their heart was not in it.

Overall, weak but not without redeeming merits. 3/10 Bethany Cox

The movie seemed to have everything going for it at the start and it starts well but somewhere down the road the director and the people in charge just forgot why they were making the movie and got trapped in each others ideas.

Why am I saying this - 1. The movie starts off with a pandemic which is not curable - fair topic 2. People want to escape the country before quarantine laws are enforced - fair point too 3. Heard and headed for a Shangri la - fair point

Despite the above, the movie without any pressure about the virus/infection turns into a more than decent human interest movie and should have continued down that road. Tons of emotional trauma and baggage would have made this an above average movie but the ideas start to spin and the mess unravels with more muck than one can digest.

The story should have been about the survivors but....

The movie does not show anything about the infection either.

Go ponder and leave this thing alone.

Aside from the first couple of minutes (which were actually fairly promising, as a mother and her son try to escape London and the soldiers who were shooting anyone trying to get out of the city after the outbreak of a deadly disease) I was confused from the very beginning of this movie. Made in 2015, it depicts a global pandemic that makes the Covid-19 pandemic look minor league. This disease is caused by resistance to over-prescribed antibiotics, has no cure or treatment, begins by disfiguring those who get infected and then eventually kills everyone it touches. That much was clear - but what confused me was the plane. Not because all travel in and out of the UK and all flights were prohibited. I get that there are still planes and some people will be able to access them no matter what. But why this particular group. The captain, Tobias (Edmund Kingsley) said that he had a "select" group of passengers. But why? In what way? They really didn't seem all that "select" to me. So I was confused by - why these people, in this plane and at this time? And that was never really clarified.

But beyond that, it just wasn't an especially interesting or original movie. The description makes you think that there's going to be some sort of outbreak on the plane that makes the flight horrific, but really most of the action takes place once the plane lands to refuel and gets attacked by the infected - and even the attacks are dealt with fairly easily. I will say that I was intrigued by the character of Eric (Joe Dixon.) He was clearly being portrayed as the "bad guy" but there were other times when he was quite relatable, and even his motives at times seemed quite noble - basically - "you can't go anywhere because you'll infect anyone.) Aside from him, though, none of the characters were especially interesting. As far as the story goes, I didn't understand the need for the second plane and the flirtatious exchanges between Tobias and the other (female) pilot. The story didn't need that. And, sure, a few people die - you expect that - but while it portrayed (mostly through the dialogue of the characters) a world gone completely to hell, frankly, with bodies being burned in the open and a desperate and frightened population, it just seemed to be lacking much in the way of real intensity, and it ended up being a movie I could watch (thankfully it's fairly short) but not really get engrossed in. (4/10)

The world is going to hell in an antibiotic-resistant- plague powered hand cart. Soldiers are shooting people dead on the street and the suburban houses of the infected are set a blaze.

A bunch of people manage to get aboard a plane and make a dash for it. Locked in to a confided environment, with the potential of infection aboard and the world burning below, this is dynamite.

Production, acting and writing are sufficient to carry all this off and is very tense and moving in places.

Happy days?

No. The problem with this film is the plot. To unfold the way it does the characters have to make one shockingly ill-thought out choice after another. You know in horror films when the guy goes down in to the cellar on his own just to find out what that scrapping noise is? Well every single character in this film does this, about every six minutes.

This sounds nit-picky for what is essentially a sci-fi film; but it is so annoying it distracts from the film.

"Hey Gary I'm just going to pop out and have a chat with this guy who has been trying to kill us for the last twenty minutes."

"Right-oh Fred, want to take this gun with you mate?"

"No I'm sure it will be fine. Just sneeze into my mouth for good luck"

The ending reaches an appropriate climax but I was left wondering what was the point in it all.

Good acting and production hung on a distorted framework.

It was so annoying that everyone was acting stupid, I wanted to punch my screen watching this!