NOTE IMDb
3,3/10
1,9 k
MA NOTE
Un haut gradé à la recherche de son frère disparu dans un naufrage spatial fait analyser la mémoire de l'unique rescapée extraite d'une capsule éjectable. On reconstitue la sinistre odyssée ... Tout lireUn haut gradé à la recherche de son frère disparu dans un naufrage spatial fait analyser la mémoire de l'unique rescapée extraite d'une capsule éjectable. On reconstitue la sinistre odyssée des 5 passagers de cette capsule conçue pour 4.Un haut gradé à la recherche de son frère disparu dans un naufrage spatial fait analyser la mémoire de l'unique rescapée extraite d'une capsule éjectable. On reconstitue la sinistre odyssée des 5 passagers de cette capsule conçue pour 4.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
If I could give it a -10, I'd complain I couldn't give it a -11.
Unbelievable bad script and acting (as in none). Homeworld 1 had better graphics, heck, I'm pretty sure Half Life 1 will hold up to this. It may have the tag "sci-fi", but I'm voting for IMDB to add a "sci-cry" tag, though Half Life 3 may be released sooner then that happening...
Edit; Atleast the keyboard warriors are telling the truth, the movie really sucks.
Unbelievable bad script and acting (as in none). Homeworld 1 had better graphics, heck, I'm pretty sure Half Life 1 will hold up to this. It may have the tag "sci-fi", but I'm voting for IMDB to add a "sci-cry" tag, though Half Life 3 may be released sooner then that happening...
Edit; Atleast the keyboard warriors are telling the truth, the movie really sucks.
Too many negative reviews and poor ratings don't make this movie that bad. In fact I quite enjoyed it. The movie moves at an acceptable pace, the story is fine and the acting is okay.
It looks like this is another film that I rate higher than what the majority viewers think. Usually it is the other way around. I consider this movie good enough to make it very watchable and pleasant to view. It fits perfectly in the sci-fi genre.
For a movie made on a shoestring it is an admirable result.
It looks like this is another film that I rate higher than what the majority viewers think. Usually it is the other way around. I consider this movie good enough to make it very watchable and pleasant to view. It fits perfectly in the sci-fi genre.
For a movie made on a shoestring it is an admirable result.
I don't know why there were good reviews/ratings for this movie. A total waste of time. Sorry to be harsh, but it is what it is. Bad sfx, cgi, storyline and poor acting. Do yourself a favor and pass on this one.
I had the opportunity to see this film on the big screen. I think what we have to remember is that the effects are astonishing. The viewer will question if they are watching the set or a green screen shot, its that clean. The story is a culmination and mix of ideas cleverly weaved together with an ending that will not leave you disappointed. Some highlights were seeing Doug Jones not in makeup or costume, and Tim Russ as a bad guy to root for. I think the negative reviewers need to consider the budget and quality you are getting. You don't buy a Honda and expect it to drive like a Ferrari. Just like I wouldn't expect this movie to have the same draw as a Star Wars. Knowing this I really enjoyed it for the entertainment value and underlying relevant hints at current events. Well done.
The plot lines are not new. There is a space crew in trouble. There are conflicts over authority. There is some perceived alien presence threatening the crew. There is a possible underlying government project.
The production is better than a typical sci fi TV show but not trying to extend the boundaries of CGI which seems to disappoint some. The ending may disappoint some as there is no extended battle. If you iike sci fi. most will at least accept it. I rate this is an average for many of the lower budget sci fi movies. That is, watchable since it should be about the story.It is a plus if you are a Star Trek fan to see familiar actors.
Note: It is cannot be a waste of 2 hrs since it does not even last that long.
The production is better than a typical sci fi TV show but not trying to extend the boundaries of CGI which seems to disappoint some. The ending may disappoint some as there is no extended battle. If you iike sci fi. most will at least accept it. I rate this is an average for many of the lower budget sci fi movies. That is, watchable since it should be about the story.It is a plus if you are a Star Trek fan to see familiar actors.
Note: It is cannot be a waste of 2 hrs since it does not even last that long.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesMarina Sirtis, Armin Shimerman, and Tim Russ have each starred in each of the 1990s Star Trek series as Counselor Deanna Troi in Star Trek: La nouvelle génération (1987), Quark in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine (1993) and Lt. Commander Tuvok in Star Trek: Voyager (1995), respectively. Meanwhile, Hana Hatae and Manu Intiraymi played recurring characters Molly O'Brien on TNG and DS9, and Icheb on Voyager, respectively. Later, Doug Jones would also star as Commander Saru in the 2017 prequel series Star Trek: Discovery (2017).
- GaffesWhen the nurse shines the light into Eve's eyes and then walks away, in the next scene from Eve's side, her eyes are closed before opening. Her eyes are then open from the front view and again closed from the side.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is 5th Passenger?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 29min(89 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant