NOTE IMDb
3,3/10
1,9 k
MA NOTE
Un haut gradé à la recherche de son frère disparu dans un naufrage spatial fait analyser la mémoire de l'unique rescapée extraite d'une capsule éjectable. On reconstitue la sinistre odyssée ... Tout lireUn haut gradé à la recherche de son frère disparu dans un naufrage spatial fait analyser la mémoire de l'unique rescapée extraite d'une capsule éjectable. On reconstitue la sinistre odyssée des 5 passagers de cette capsule conçue pour 4.Un haut gradé à la recherche de son frère disparu dans un naufrage spatial fait analyser la mémoire de l'unique rescapée extraite d'une capsule éjectable. On reconstitue la sinistre odyssée des 5 passagers de cette capsule conçue pour 4.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
Too many negative reviews and poor ratings don't make this movie that bad. In fact I quite enjoyed it. The movie moves at an acceptable pace, the story is fine and the acting is okay.
It looks like this is another film that I rate higher than what the majority viewers think. Usually it is the other way around. I consider this movie good enough to make it very watchable and pleasant to view. It fits perfectly in the sci-fi genre.
For a movie made on a shoestring it is an admirable result.
It looks like this is another film that I rate higher than what the majority viewers think. Usually it is the other way around. I consider this movie good enough to make it very watchable and pleasant to view. It fits perfectly in the sci-fi genre.
For a movie made on a shoestring it is an admirable result.
The fanboi/shill reviews, or the poor acting.
I am unsure who figured these people, who acted in the past together, could still act ...together and succeed. The show is a modern B. Not that a B movie is bad.
The acting was rigid, forced and, at times, off key. The CGI was bad when ever the color red or orange was needed it seems ;)
If you are a Star Trek cast fan, there will be no deterring you from seeing this. If you are a sucker for IMDB ratings, do not be fooled, this rating is falsly inflated. The movie rating will balance out in the 4.2-5.0 range
I am unsure who figured these people, who acted in the past together, could still act ...together and succeed. The show is a modern B. Not that a B movie is bad.
The acting was rigid, forced and, at times, off key. The CGI was bad when ever the color red or orange was needed it seems ;)
If you are a Star Trek cast fan, there will be no deterring you from seeing this. If you are a sucker for IMDB ratings, do not be fooled, this rating is falsly inflated. The movie rating will balance out in the 4.2-5.0 range
I was entertained by this low budget sci fi film. Yes it's a bit shaky in places. Couple of wooden acting moments. But for the most part it's a good bmovie film with passable cgi effects.
The script obviously borrows greatly from Alien but with a twist. .......I did guess before the reveal but it wasn't too obvious.
Credit where it's due. You can see it was made with passion by young energetic filmmakers who must have worked very hard to get it completed. And no.......I do not know anyone involved with the film. Ha ha. Not as bad as the quite frankly ludicrous 1 star ratings make out!? Give it a chance.
The plot lines are not new. There is a space crew in trouble. There are conflicts over authority. There is some perceived alien presence threatening the crew. There is a possible underlying government project.
The production is better than a typical sci fi TV show but not trying to extend the boundaries of CGI which seems to disappoint some. The ending may disappoint some as there is no extended battle. If you iike sci fi. most will at least accept it. I rate this is an average for many of the lower budget sci fi movies. That is, watchable since it should be about the story.It is a plus if you are a Star Trek fan to see familiar actors.
Note: It is cannot be a waste of 2 hrs since it does not even last that long.
The production is better than a typical sci fi TV show but not trying to extend the boundaries of CGI which seems to disappoint some. The ending may disappoint some as there is no extended battle. If you iike sci fi. most will at least accept it. I rate this is an average for many of the lower budget sci fi movies. That is, watchable since it should be about the story.It is a plus if you are a Star Trek fan to see familiar actors.
Note: It is cannot be a waste of 2 hrs since it does not even last that long.
I don't know why there were good reviews/ratings for this movie. A total waste of time. Sorry to be harsh, but it is what it is. Bad sfx, cgi, storyline and poor acting. Do yourself a favor and pass on this one.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesMarina Sirtis, Armin Shimerman, and Tim Russ have each starred in each of the 1990s Star Trek series as Counselor Deanna Troi in Star Trek: La nouvelle génération (1987), Quark in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine (1993) and Lt. Commander Tuvok in Star Trek: Voyager (1995), respectively. Meanwhile, Hana Hatae and Manu Intiraymi played recurring characters Molly O'Brien on TNG and DS9, and Icheb on Voyager, respectively. Later, Doug Jones would also star as Commander Saru in the 2017 prequel series Star Trek: Discovery (2017).
- GaffesWhen the nurse shines the light into Eve's eyes and then walks away, in the next scene from Eve's side, her eyes are closed before opening. Her eyes are then open from the front view and again closed from the side.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is 5th Passenger?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 29 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39:1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant