NOTE IMDb
5,6/10
32 k
MA NOTE
Long métrage d'animation inspiré du célèbre dessin animé "Scooby-Doo".Long métrage d'animation inspiré du célèbre dessin animé "Scooby-Doo".Long métrage d'animation inspiré du célèbre dessin animé "Scooby-Doo".
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 3 nominations au total
Will Forte
- Shaggy Rogers
- (voix)
Mark Wahlberg
- Blue Falcon
- (voix)
Zac Efron
- Fred Jones
- (voix)
Frank Welker
- Scooby-Doo
- (voix)
- …
Pierce Gagnon
- Young Fred
- (voix)
Simon Cowell
- Simon Cowell
- (voix)
Henry Winkler
- Keith
- (voix)
Harry Perry
- Harry Perry
- (voix)
Avis à la une
Did not have the classic Scooby Vibe. Trying to hard to be hip. Mystery Incorporated cartoon was so much better.
It started well, with a touching scene of the main characters meeting for the forst time as kids (or puppies, in Scooby's case) and then having one of their traditional adventures. However, this only lasts 15 minutes, and from there the movie stops being a Scooby Doo movie and starts being a superhero movie, with Dick Dastardly as the supervillain, and Blue Falcon and his gang as superheroes, with the Scooby gang stuck there in a movie that is not their own.
Because let's face it, just like in a James Bond movie we have certain expectations, in a Scoob movie we also have expectations, and they are not met. That distinctive type of adventures where they explore a haunted location and, after many scares, end up discovering that it was all a not supernatural trick by some criminal, is not here, except for a brief nod at the beginning. Instead, we get a generic modern children's movie, with characters running around from chase to chase, battle to battle and explosion to explosion without a compelling plot, while making pop culture references. The plot involves saving the world from a large-scale supernatural threat (really supernatural, none of the subversion characteristic of the source material).
So, if we forget about wanting a Scooby Doo movie and focus on the movie we get, it's not very good either. You can see where they try to have jokes for the adult watchers, but they lack the wit and talent to make them funny. They occasionally remember that this is supposed to be a Scooby Doo movie, and they have traditional gags like having Scooby and Shaggy, in the middle of being chased by the critters, turn around and serve the critters as waiters, disconcerting them for a while, but it's too little and done without much talent. You also get a scene where two male characters fight and a female character says it's toxic masculinity, which is kind of a hateful message to send to children.
In short, if you want a Scooby movie, this is not it, and if you want a generic modern kid's movie, this is not a good one.
Because let's face it, just like in a James Bond movie we have certain expectations, in a Scoob movie we also have expectations, and they are not met. That distinctive type of adventures where they explore a haunted location and, after many scares, end up discovering that it was all a not supernatural trick by some criminal, is not here, except for a brief nod at the beginning. Instead, we get a generic modern children's movie, with characters running around from chase to chase, battle to battle and explosion to explosion without a compelling plot, while making pop culture references. The plot involves saving the world from a large-scale supernatural threat (really supernatural, none of the subversion characteristic of the source material).
So, if we forget about wanting a Scooby Doo movie and focus on the movie we get, it's not very good either. You can see where they try to have jokes for the adult watchers, but they lack the wit and talent to make them funny. They occasionally remember that this is supposed to be a Scooby Doo movie, and they have traditional gags like having Scooby and Shaggy, in the middle of being chased by the critters, turn around and serve the critters as waiters, disconcerting them for a while, but it's too little and done without much talent. You also get a scene where two male characters fight and a female character says it's toxic masculinity, which is kind of a hateful message to send to children.
In short, if you want a Scooby movie, this is not it, and if you want a generic modern kid's movie, this is not a good one.
This will probably be the entry in the Scooby-Doo franchise that is going to equally divide its audience, with each side giving its own valid reasons. Some viewers are going to appreciate the modernization of the story, while others will wish it had stayed in the late 1960s. Some are going to get a kick out of the pop culture references, while others will ask themselves why they are in a Scooby-Doo movie. Some will appreciate the superhero theme, while others will forget that Blue Falcon and Dynomutt have existed in the past. Some will recoil at the childish crude humor, while others may giggle at it. Some longtime Hanna-Barbara fanatics are going to love the tie-in with other characters, while others are going to call it a forced attempt to kick-start a shared universe. It'll be very interesting to see how the overall consensus falls, and it'll also be up to the individual to form its own opinion. At the end of the day, it's a kids' film. That's the best anyone can say about it. It does what it can to introduce this franchise to a younger generation through those quirks and contemporary computer animation, while at the same time, it does have enough weight in the story and aims closer to the source material than more recent attempts, even when it doesn't always digest easy. It'll be up to you to decide where this lands. Obviously, it's more focused at entertaining today's kids than being a great entry in the Scooby-Doo canon. However, if it connects with the long-time meddling kids that grew up with the characters for over half a century, then it has definitely earned its extra Scooby Snack points.
If you or your children never watched "Scooby Doo, Where Are You!" then it stands by itself as another kids movie to watch with your family. If you're a nostalgic person and love that feeling, then Scooby Dooby Doo not watch.
I had so many expectations. Scoob! sets on a completely different track from the original stories, which I would welcome if it was better written. The jokes are unfunny, the movie feels unenthusiastic just like Gina Rodriguez's voice for Velma. Stick to the Direct-to-Video animated films. They're clearly superior.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe montage of Scooby-Doo and their adventures is almost a shot-by-shot replica of the opening credits of Scoubidou (1969).
- GaffesThe small, feather-like "spikes" on the Blue Falcon's suit often intersect and visibly clip into each other as he moves.
- Citations
Velma Dinkley: [examines a hair] Trace amounts of hair oil, twelve-year-old scotch...
Daphne Blake: Ugh, is the bad guy my dad?
- Crédits fousPart of the closing credits are a montage of the Scooby gang and their friends/enemies on various adventures.
- ConnexionsFeatured in AniMat's Crazy Cartoon Cast: Big Bird's Big Break (2018)
- Bandes originalesCalifornia Love
Written by Roger Troutman, Larry Troutman, Joe Cocker, Ronnie Hudson, Chris Stainton and Mikel Hooks
Performed by Tupac Shakur featuring Dr. Dre and Roger Troutman
Courtesy of Entertainment One U.S. LP
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Scoob!?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Scooby-Doo
- Lieux de tournage
- Los Angeles, Californie, États-Unis(Reel FX Santa Monica)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 2 188 425 $US
- Montant brut mondial
- 28 588 425 $US
- Durée1 heure 33 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant