NOTE IMDb
6,1/10
1,6 k
MA NOTE
À Jérusalem, en 605 avant J.-C., Daniel est esclave au service du roi babylonien Nabuchodonosor et devient l'un de ses sages. Sous le règne de Darius, il est contraint de prendre une décisio... Tout lireÀ Jérusalem, en 605 avant J.-C., Daniel est esclave au service du roi babylonien Nabuchodonosor et devient l'un de ses sages. Sous le règne de Darius, il est contraint de prendre une décision de vie ou de mort pour prouver sa foi en Dieu.À Jérusalem, en 605 avant J.-C., Daniel est esclave au service du roi babylonien Nabuchodonosor et devient l'un de ses sages. Sous le règne de Darius, il est contraint de prendre une décision de vie ou de mort pour prouver sa foi en Dieu.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
William Matthews
- Hootan
- (as Matthew Tailford)
Francesco Curá
- Darius's Soldier
- (as Francis J. Cura)
Gallagher
- Astrologer-Abib
- (as Leo Gallagher)
Avis à la une
I watch all Bible based movies available to me, half fall far short of my hopes for accuracy. This little low-budget gem won me over, so I purchased it for my library. Yes, there are some cheesy scenes looking out over Babylon, but they're few and short lived. Yes, some of the editing was careless (a bloodless sword being withdrawn from Belshazzar's body), but it is faithful to the story presented in the first six books of Daniel, and most of the performances are well done and sensitive to the characters.
I find Bongiorno's younger Daniel as wonderful to watch as Miano's elder Daniel. Saxon's Nebuchadnezzar is a very nuanced performance (and my favorite of the four kings covered). If the magicians, enchanters, and sorcerers seem a bit campy, go grab a Coke from the fridge, and they'll be gone when you return.
I give this production a ten for its effort, an eight for execution.
NONE of this praise can translate to the horrible effort of PureFlix "Book of Esther", one of the worst Bible movies I've seen. That should have had a sword run clean through it. It nearly made me break out in hives for all it's egregious failures on every level.
PureFlix movies can range from the great effort of Daniel, and Ruth, to the dregs of "Esther" and the mediocre "Blink of an Eye". I suggest viewing free before considering purchase. We all have different expectations for worthy viewing.
I find Bongiorno's younger Daniel as wonderful to watch as Miano's elder Daniel. Saxon's Nebuchadnezzar is a very nuanced performance (and my favorite of the four kings covered). If the magicians, enchanters, and sorcerers seem a bit campy, go grab a Coke from the fridge, and they'll be gone when you return.
I give this production a ten for its effort, an eight for execution.
NONE of this praise can translate to the horrible effort of PureFlix "Book of Esther", one of the worst Bible movies I've seen. That should have had a sword run clean through it. It nearly made me break out in hives for all it's egregious failures on every level.
PureFlix movies can range from the great effort of Daniel, and Ruth, to the dregs of "Esther" and the mediocre "Blink of an Eye". I suggest viewing free before considering purchase. We all have different expectations for worthy viewing.
Some of the reviewers for this movie seem to be prejudiced against a biblical movie production. Well, we live in such times where it is popular to dislike anything to do with the creator of the universe. But just like Daniel told the truth to the kings he served, this movie tells the truth better than any Hollywood production ever made. (even "The Ten Commandments" with Charlton Heston.) The is the new #1 Hollywood biblical production. Filmed with excellent and prominent actors and actresses, celebrities and performers. A "Must See" for believers and non-believers alike. This biblical story stands on it's own, even on a tight budget. Bible stories do not require expensive special effects to convey the message. Bravo!!!
The Book of Daniel may not have an epic budget, but it is well made and supported by a really good cast. The casting of the young and elder Daniel is very effective, with Robert Miano giving an especially affecting performance. The direction is assured, with a script that shows obvious understanding and engagement with the Old Testament, and which takes its time to fully convey Daniel's stories of the four Kings. A very good film that is well worth seeking out.
First I will let you know that I'm a Christian, but I'm also a huge movie fan and in my opinion most Christian movies are not that good.
The Book of Daniel isn't perfect, but I feel it is well acted, fairly well written and stays true to the story.
While there are no real special effects and it is a low budget movie, that doesn't make it bad.
Daniel is a person in the Bible that really hasn't had too many turns on the small or big screen, and this is a pretty decent attempt at telling his story and God's story of love for all people.
If you go into this movie with an open mind, instead of rejecting it because it is a Biblical movie, you may enjoy it.
The Book of Daniel isn't perfect, but I feel it is well acted, fairly well written and stays true to the story.
While there are no real special effects and it is a low budget movie, that doesn't make it bad.
Daniel is a person in the Bible that really hasn't had too many turns on the small or big screen, and this is a pretty decent attempt at telling his story and God's story of love for all people.
If you go into this movie with an open mind, instead of rejecting it because it is a Biblical movie, you may enjoy it.
If it wasn't for Rolf Saxon, i wouldn't have gotten the DVD for it. I'm not a biblical enthusiast or even knowledgeable about Daniel and his story as a prophet. The cast is first rate with Rolf Saxon as King Nebud; Lance Hendricksen as Cyrus; Leo Gallagher as the astrologer and other actors. The film was directed by a woman, rare these days. She seems knowledgeable about her subject and the film. First, there is a lot of dialogue on par with a Shakespearean drama. If you're not into biblical movies, you may not appreciate it as much. I enjoyed the features especially the bloopers and behind the scenes as well.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesAnna Zielinski's directorial debut.
- GaffesKing Nebuchadnezzar orders a golden statue of himself 90 feet high. The statue in the film however, is not Nebuchadnezzar, but 4th Century Christian Bishop Saint Nicholas of Myra, as evidenced by the fact that he is wearing the vestments of a bishop, carries a shepherd's crozier and carries a book and 3 apples (or 3 lumps of gold). The statue also also expresses the hand gesture of a priestly blessing.
- Crédits fousAt the end of the credits it says "The persons and events in this motion picture are fictitious. Any similarities to actual persons or events is unintentional"
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Book of Daniel?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Tiên Tri Daniel
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 30 minutes
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was The Book of Daniel (2013) officially released in India in English?
Répondre