Lantrani

An anthology is the best way to tell short stories without stretching them into a full-fledged movie, which can often result in a lagging and ultimately unsuccessful film. This anthology depicts three stories helmed by three directors, showcasing the struggles in small-town India while delivering a sharp critique of the judicial system, politicians, and media.

The first story, featuring Johnny Lever and Jisshu U Sengupta, revolves around queer rights. It perfectly illustrates how even today, the judicial system criminalizes individuals with different preferences. This satirical comedy makes you laugh and think simultaneously. Director Kaushik Ganguly has created a very honest story, and both actors have performed brilliantly. This story is the best among the lot.

The second story is about how the pandemic has affected a small-time media company and the lengths they go to survive. Working in the same industry, I can vouch for the story's accuracy and well-researched satire. It shows the dark side of survival and how a client can control a company. Director Bhaskar Hazarika has done a good job, with great portrayals by actors Boloram Das and Preeti Hansraj Sharma. It is a fun yet eye-opening watch.

The third story is about a silent protest against the caste system, which prevents a village sarpanch from opening a bank account to utilize government funds. The movie highlights the righteous lady and her husband, played by Jitendra Kumar and Nimisha Sajayan, who fight tooth and nail against the system. They both do their parts well, but this story is not as engaging as the other two, despite being the longest. Director Gurvinder Singh's "Dharna Mana Hai" is the weakest of the three. Nevertheless, it raises a valid issue.

This anthology deserves your time and offers something new from the makers. Don't be swayed by the negative reviews.

#pranureviews #Lantrani #LantraniReview.

I recently saw the movie Lantrani and it is a great film you fully invested in it it's absolutely fantastic. This movie is filled with amazing actors and actresses. Everyone is taking full ownership of this film and played their role very well legendary performances. In this movie we can feel the emotions, drama, comedy and entertainment. The way story is presented is very well and very well written too and every story of the movie ends with a question to the society that you ask yourself it's logical, logically written and the slow music they all add to that joiner and everything is engages you. The character debu(Jitendra kumar)is silent but expressing himself by his actions. Finally I want to give a special shout-out to the production team neeljai films who made this movie for us.👏🏻👏🏻

First Story - This is the best of the three stories. Kaushik Ganguly is well known for his good deeds. That he is one of the biggest directors in India at the moment can be understood by looking at this short film. BGM and cinematography gave proper accompaniment to the direction. Without such good BGM by Indradip Dasgupta, the direction would not have been complete.

Second Story-Director Bhaskar Hazarika. I expected better work from the director of Milestones of Indian Cinema "Kothanadi", "Aamish". The content was good "advertisment covers the face". But the storyline was not compelling. There was a visible inertia in the performance of several people.

Third Story- Director Gurvinder singh. The best USP of the story is the script writing. Many talks are presented in very short time. Content and presentation is very interesting.

Overall - In all three stories there is a legitimate protest against the government system. Alternative avenues of protest in all three cases are quite interesting. Each storys are served to the audience mixed with good humor.

I don't know who they people are? Rating it 7-10 it's not worth of even zero rating. I would say -10 rating for this. People who are rating 7-10 are the team of this filmmaker. What a trash fully time waste I finished it in half an hour skipping it very fast. Don't watch it . Only the first part of it that was of half an hour was ok. In which Johny lever is a COP. And It was about message for LBTQ. Other than that 1 hour is totally garbage story. Gaaliya Dene ka man kar rha hai salo ko. Ye top review Dene Wale jaha mile pakad k pit dalo in sab ko. Desh ki janta ko pagal bna hai ye sarey milkr.

I thought i will be a amazing movie because of its actors but i disappointed with the whole movie i found it as time waste. Disappointment in a movie can stem from various factors, ranging from high expectations to poor execution. One might enter a theater with excitement, fueled by anticipation for a promising cast, only to leave feeling let down and as if precious time has been squandered. Such was my experience with a recent film, one I had hoped would be a cinematic marvel but, alas, fell short of its potential.

It was a balmy Friday evening when I decided to treat myself to a movie night, seeking solace in the dimly lit theater amidst a hectic week. The film in question had been buzzing with anticipation for months, boasting an ensemble cast that read like a who's who of Hollywood's finest. With actors of such caliber gracing the screen, my expectations soared, envisioning a narrative rich in depth and complexity, complemented by stellar performances.

As the opening credits rolled and the plot began to unfold, I found myself initially captivated by the visual splendor and the promise of what lay ahead. The cinematography was breathtaking, each frame meticulously crafted to evoke a sense of wonder and intrigue. However, as the story progressed, cracks began to surface, revealing a disjointed narrative plagued by predictability and lackluster character development.

Despite the best efforts of the esteemed cast, their performances felt stifled by a script that failed to fully explore the complexities of their respective roles. Moments that should have resonated with emotion fell flat, leaving me detached and unable to fully invest in the journey unfolding before me. It was as though the actors themselves were shackled by the constraints of a narrative that refused to transcend mediocrity.

Furthermore, the pacing of the film left much to be desired, with scenes dragging on longer than necessary, sapping the momentum and testing the patience of even the most dedicated viewer. What began as a promising premise soon devolved into a tedious exercise in endurance, with each passing minute feeling like an eternity trapped in celluloid purgatory.

Perhaps most disappointing of all was the lack of originality, with the plot following a tired formula that offered little in the way of innovation or intrigue. It was as though the filmmakers had taken a paint-by-numbers approach to storytelling, content to rehash tired tropes rather than blaze a trail of their own.

By the time the credits began to roll and the lights flickered back to life, I was left with a sense of profound disappointment and a nagging feeling of regret. Regret for having invested my time and energy in a film that ultimately failed to deliver on its promises, and regret for the missed opportunity to experience something truly remarkable.

In the end, my disappointment with the film was not born out of a lack of appreciation for the craft or the talent involved, but rather out of a desire for something more. More depth, more complexity, more originality. While the allure of a star-studded cast may have drawn me in initially, it was the absence of substance that ultimately left me feeling empty-handed.

As I stepped out of the theater and into the cool night air, I couldn't help but lament the wasted potential of what could have been. In the realm of cinema, as in life, there are no guarantees, and sometimes even the most promising of endeavors can fall short of our expectations. But perhaps therein lies the beauty of the medium - the endless possibility of discovery, even in the face of disappointment.