Sebastian

Despite the film's confident naturalism, it seems less intimate as it goes on, with Max somehow growing more distant and generic as he becomes more comfortable in his own skin.

Synopsis: Max (Ruaridh Mollica) is a 25-year-old aspiring novelist, living in London and paying his dues working at a literary magazine. Frustrated by his own ambitions and the pressures to succeed, Max begins moonlighting as a sex worker with the pseudonym Sebastian, secretly meeting men via an escorting platform and using his experiences to fuel his stories. What begins as a few furtive meetings soon becomes a hidden nocturnal life, and the debut novel that he has been longing to write finally seems within reach. Finding himself more comfortable as Sebastian than expected, yet determined to keep his exploits a secret, Max increasingly struggles to remain in control of a delicately balanced double-life. As he confronts conflicting feelings of ecstasy, shame, and exhilarating liberation, Max has to reckon with whether Sebastian is merely a writer's tool to achieve first-hand authenticity -- or whether something more is at stake.

"Max" (Ruaridh Mollica) juggles a career as an aspiring journalist and novelist with charging £200 per hour selling his services as an escort to, mainly, older men. His boyish good looks and obvious inexperience at the latter makes him popular and he proves successful enough to use his varied experiences to form the basis of his book. His publisher likes the freshness and intimacy of the adventures of "Sebastian" but a rather self-induced setback at work forces a change to the dynamic of both his life and his work. Though there is the odd sex scene to enliven the drama, the rest of this is all a rather shallow investigation of the high-end comfort market and whilst Mollica is easy enough on the eye his performance over-relies on that and is quite lacklustre. The story itself has quite a few gaps that don't quite add up; timelines don't quite track and by the conclusion I actually thought that instead of offering us some sort of critical observation of an industry that transcends just about every aspect of society, we ended up with more of a rather exploitative - cruel, even, character about whom I really didn't care so much after a while. Jonathan Hyde brings a bit of (rather sad) nuance to the proceedings but Ingvar Sigurdsson's "Daniel" seemed just to Jekkyl and Hyde to be plausible at quite a crucial juncture in the young man's increasingly light-weight story. Rather than a movie, this might have made for a better three-part drama that could have focussed a little more cohesively on the aspects of his life, love and self-evaluation but as it is, it's all too bitty. Worth a watch, but not what it could have been.

Having never heard a single word about this, I thought I was going to see something trashy and lo and behold, it turns out I ended up viewing a good movie! Go figure! But seriously, while this has some imperfections, the quality here came as a great surprise. The writing, direction, cinematography and particularly the acting all have merits of varying degrees. A film about a smart young writer, successful at short stories, who decides to write a novel about gay sex workers and then decides to become one himself for authenticity only to become somewhat addicted to it all to the point that it is getting in the way of his writing about it. He hasn't the time for both! Ruaridh Mollica, who I never heard of prior to this, is really very good. His extremely bold performance is subtle, brave and he never really misses a beat. He's a bit mesmerizing. It would be cool to see how he is in other films, but that might be tricky here in America. All of the other actors are strong, particularly Jonathan Hyde, the only actor in this who might be familiar to the general American public. While he is good, his character's relationship with our young writer is problematic and where the film stumbles a bit. Mollica responds to him in very contradictory ways that are confusing. This has nothing to do with the acting. It's either the writing and/or the directing that falters here. This is not a great film, but it's really interesting film, though it is not for prudes. There are many sex scenes and one in particular is very explicit. It also has a truly lovely ending.

A queer writer and sex worker finds his own story and voice, hands-on.

"Sebastian" addresses issues such as shame, authenticity in fiction, consent and work-life balance with a gentle touch. The power asymmetry in sex work is shown with a simple plot device which is effective without being crude. The right of sex workers to tell their own story is stressed by the narrative structure itself until the climax in the very last scene which wraps it all up nicely.

Seen at HIFF, where it was very well received by the audience. The director told us his original inspiration from the London queer community while he studied there.

A young writer explores sex workers circle for write a novel. But this adventure is not easy or cheep and, in profound manner, transforms him .

A not original theme , well reminded , well acted- especially Jonathan Hyde contribution represents a serious good point , realistic - the trace of a Julien Sorel in new version - and a good work of Ruaridh Mollica as Max.

In essence , a clash between editorial world and sex workers one , the reactions , the dialogue, the inspired last scene reminding, in cold - precise manner the laws of a confrontation who gives to young writer chance of significant transformation.

Great part - the relation with mother as oasis in the circle of chain of tensions.