Une femme assassinée la nuit. Une policière expérimentée soupçonne un homme malgré le couvre-feu imposé aux hommes.Une femme assassinée la nuit. Une policière expérimentée soupçonne un homme malgré le couvre-feu imposé aux hommes.Une femme assassinée la nuit. Une policière expérimentée soupçonne un homme malgré le couvre-feu imposé aux hommes.
- Récompenses
- 3 victoires et 3 nominations au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
I'm really open minded, but this show didn't make much sense to me. I only gave it a try because I like Sarah Parish, but I couldn't get past two episodes. It felt like it was made for people who don't like men at all, and there was so much misandry in it. Femcels would probably enjoy it. I don't know why they decided to create a show like this. Sarah talents could have been used elsewhere. Pure nonsense. If you think millions of men would allow this is laughable. I don't know why any man signed up to be in this show. Also, I didn't understand why they made Sarah's character so masculine when she was clearly attracted to men.
This series sets out two stories that overlap:
The first being a gruesome murder. Who done it?
The second being a ludicrous idea of locking all men up from 7pm to 7am everynight whilst being monitered by an ankle tag.
Good acting and well filmed. However I do find some of the accents very harsh and grinding, whilst they murder the english language.
Obviously giving men ankle tags and locking them inside at night would not work in a democratic society such as the UK, however there are so many other reasons why this would never work and I think the series shows this.
I like programs like this that are thought provoking, before the mad politicians and fanatics come up with the idea.
One thing that I think would have been good and helpful is to highlight the abuse and murder statistics at the start of each episode. I personally have no idea.
Yes sadly there is a portion of men that need to be improsoned, monitered and watched, but I hope there are decent men walking our streets. I know a few. So in a civilised society this would not work, however this issue of violence against any innocent cannot be ignored.
Back to the drawing board!
The first being a gruesome murder. Who done it?
The second being a ludicrous idea of locking all men up from 7pm to 7am everynight whilst being monitered by an ankle tag.
Good acting and well filmed. However I do find some of the accents very harsh and grinding, whilst they murder the english language.
Obviously giving men ankle tags and locking them inside at night would not work in a democratic society such as the UK, however there are so many other reasons why this would never work and I think the series shows this.
I like programs like this that are thought provoking, before the mad politicians and fanatics come up with the idea.
One thing that I think would have been good and helpful is to highlight the abuse and murder statistics at the start of each episode. I personally have no idea.
Yes sadly there is a portion of men that need to be improsoned, monitered and watched, but I hope there are decent men walking our streets. I know a few. So in a civilised society this would not work, however this issue of violence against any innocent cannot be ignored.
Back to the drawing board!
This series is a thought provoking about a world (or rather a country, Great Britain, where men have a mandated curfew during the evening /night.
According to statistics the majority of the women murdered are murdered by men, so in this series the British parliament has voted for a curfew.
A very gritty murder is commited, secrets are being unfolded, relationships uncovered.
Are men more violent then women?
Women's safety against men's freedom, which should weigh the heaviest?
I really enjoyed, good intrigue, a few surprises and good acting all around.
Why it's such low rating is a mystery.
According to statistics the majority of the women murdered are murdered by men, so in this series the British parliament has voted for a curfew.
A very gritty murder is commited, secrets are being unfolded, relationships uncovered.
Are men more violent then women?
Women's safety against men's freedom, which should weigh the heaviest?
I really enjoyed, good intrigue, a few surprises and good acting all around.
Why it's such low rating is a mystery.
"But in a world where men are bound by a curfew from 7pm to 7am"...Well err no, only in the UK according to the storyline.
The whole premise of the show is predicated on making around HALF the entire population wear criminal tracking tags and submit to a curfew! HOW exactly are you going to do that without starting a civil war..?
Had they started the story in the aftermath of a civil war and a curfew was a direct result of that, it would at least be a more credible scenario.
However, this was waaay too far fetched, to imagine it being introduced and accepted by a population as a normal peacetime (completely unenforceable) law, the writers seemingly having forgotten about the UK poll tax riots of the early 90's
And no matter how I tried, sorry just couldn't suspend reality for long enough, to stop laughing my imaginary ankle tracker off at the thought...not the reaction they would be hoping for I'm sure..
The whole premise of the show is predicated on making around HALF the entire population wear criminal tracking tags and submit to a curfew! HOW exactly are you going to do that without starting a civil war..?
Had they started the story in the aftermath of a civil war and a curfew was a direct result of that, it would at least be a more credible scenario.
However, this was waaay too far fetched, to imagine it being introduced and accepted by a population as a normal peacetime (completely unenforceable) law, the writers seemingly having forgotten about the UK poll tax riots of the early 90's
And no matter how I tried, sorry just couldn't suspend reality for long enough, to stop laughing my imaginary ankle tracker off at the thought...not the reaction they would be hoping for I'm sure..
The concept definitely had potential to be very interesting and for the most part it lived up to expectations.
Narratively, it could've been stronger. There were too many sub-plots established as attempts at red herrings. Credit where it's due, the ending was unexpected, but the constant red herrings made it hard for viewers to follow along and as usual, opened up a lot of plot holes.
I have no gripes with the performances from the main cast. And the main characters were all fleshed out well and consistent. It seems as though audiences are encouraged to dislike the main two women (played by Mandip Gill and Alexendra Burke) or at the very least dissaprove of their divisive actions, but simultaneously we also found ourselves rooting for them.
Overall, a good watch and would be interested in a second season.
Narratively, it could've been stronger. There were too many sub-plots established as attempts at red herrings. Credit where it's due, the ending was unexpected, but the constant red herrings made it hard for viewers to follow along and as usual, opened up a lot of plot holes.
I have no gripes with the performances from the main cast. And the main characters were all fleshed out well and consistent. It seems as though audiences are encouraged to dislike the main two women (played by Mandip Gill and Alexendra Burke) or at the very least dissaprove of their divisive actions, but simultaneously we also found ourselves rooting for them.
Overall, a good watch and would be interested in a second season.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesIn episode 4, around 20mins in, when James video calls Billy, he brings up some pictures of Helen's social media. One picture can be seen of Helen with another lady. This is Alexandra Burke's real life sister, Sheneice Burke.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant