NOTE IMDb
4,3/10
5,3 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA rogue Police Detective in search of his parents' killer is murdered and then reborn as the ultimate killer.A rogue Police Detective in search of his parents' killer is murdered and then reborn as the ultimate killer.A rogue Police Detective in search of his parents' killer is murdered and then reborn as the ultimate killer.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Dean Jagger
- Corbin Nash
- (as Dean S. Jagger)
Avis à la une
Awful does not start to tell you the let down. Where in the universe do these reviewers giving 9 and 10 come from? One even wrote "best movie of the year". You got to be kidding me!
I admit, the ploy is always the same: early on upon movie release, all these people show up with lots and lots of standard / non sensical praises extolling the worse movies. Technically, this trick is as old as online reviews: it fortunately should not fool anybody. Well, except me this time... I saw the IMDB average 6.something rating, thought why not? and went for it.
Well, that was a mistake: this movie was like a bad dream with nothing to redeem it. A bad movie with all the ingredients: the misfits vampires, the violent weirdos, a meh! vague story, a bout of MMA, lots of blood, a tiny touch of gothic atmosphere and above all, Ladies and Gentlemen, real baaaad acting. If you have 1:35 hour to waste, here is the occasion.
I admit, the ploy is always the same: early on upon movie release, all these people show up with lots and lots of standard / non sensical praises extolling the worse movies. Technically, this trick is as old as online reviews: it fortunately should not fool anybody. Well, except me this time... I saw the IMDB average 6.something rating, thought why not? and went for it.
Well, that was a mistake: this movie was like a bad dream with nothing to redeem it. A bad movie with all the ingredients: the misfits vampires, the violent weirdos, a meh! vague story, a bout of MMA, lots of blood, a tiny touch of gothic atmosphere and above all, Ladies and Gentlemen, real baaaad acting. If you have 1:35 hour to waste, here is the occasion.
The movie is low budget, the writing is shoddy and the acting is okay. It's nothing special. I tried very hard to watch this movie. I read the reviews that were very positive and took a chance on it and really regretted my decision to watch it.
It has a lot of promise, the sound effects were spot on, the B roll was excellent but the movie really disappoints in the A roll, the acting and the editing. I became really frustrated with the way the A roll was shot for this movie. In the first 10 minutes of the movie they don't consider framing to be important, so things that need to be wide angled are shot closely and things that are shot closely are wide angled. It makes no artistic or functional sense.
There's a dialogue scene in the first 10 minutes where the main character is speaking to another influential character and the acting is just....poor. There is no tension, there is no real emotion being shown, it's like they told the main actor to act conflicted and he took that to mean act as if he was constipated! The line delivery in that conversation was so poor, the timing so bad, I wonder if the person who cast these roles even cared!
Then there's the editing. Oh God, the editing. In that same conversation they switch the A roll (primary shots) between the two characters for every line they speak. For roughly 3 minutes you have the camera going right-left, left-right, back and forth for every....single....line of dialogue, without any transition, it's almost all straight cuts. They do use L and J cuts but sparingly. If you're epileptic and can be triggered, I'd avoid this movie at all costs.
I'll try to watch it again, because I've never felt the need to write such a negative review of a movie before. I want to be fair to the people who worked on this movie, but from my first watch, it was terrible.
It has a lot of promise, the sound effects were spot on, the B roll was excellent but the movie really disappoints in the A roll, the acting and the editing. I became really frustrated with the way the A roll was shot for this movie. In the first 10 minutes of the movie they don't consider framing to be important, so things that need to be wide angled are shot closely and things that are shot closely are wide angled. It makes no artistic or functional sense.
There's a dialogue scene in the first 10 minutes where the main character is speaking to another influential character and the acting is just....poor. There is no tension, there is no real emotion being shown, it's like they told the main actor to act conflicted and he took that to mean act as if he was constipated! The line delivery in that conversation was so poor, the timing so bad, I wonder if the person who cast these roles even cared!
Then there's the editing. Oh God, the editing. In that same conversation they switch the A roll (primary shots) between the two characters for every line they speak. For roughly 3 minutes you have the camera going right-left, left-right, back and forth for every....single....line of dialogue, without any transition, it's almost all straight cuts. They do use L and J cuts but sparingly. If you're epileptic and can be triggered, I'd avoid this movie at all costs.
I'll try to watch it again, because I've never felt the need to write such a negative review of a movie before. I want to be fair to the people who worked on this movie, but from my first watch, it was terrible.
I was hoping that my first review would be a positive one about a great movie. Sadly, that wasn't to be. This one forced my hand and demanded that I sit down and warn the public about how bad it is.
I was really looking forward to watching this. I wanted it to be a really good, but after 15 mins I was sorely disappointed. I kept hoping it would get better, but it never did.
Everything about it was wrong. Bad script, bad acting, bad cinematography, bad direction, and that mortal sin, overacting. As a lover of this genre I am begging you, please don't bother with this terrible, terrible movie.
If I could find the people who gave this such a high rating, I would lock them in a room with everyone who was involved with making this, and make them watch it for the rest of their lives.
I gave it 2 stars because I'm sure there are worse movies out there.
Excuse me now while I gouge my eyes out with a spoon.
I was really looking forward to watching this. I wanted it to be a really good, but after 15 mins I was sorely disappointed. I kept hoping it would get better, but it never did.
Everything about it was wrong. Bad script, bad acting, bad cinematography, bad direction, and that mortal sin, overacting. As a lover of this genre I am begging you, please don't bother with this terrible, terrible movie.
If I could find the people who gave this such a high rating, I would lock them in a room with everyone who was involved with making this, and make them watch it for the rest of their lives.
I gave it 2 stars because I'm sure there are worse movies out there.
Excuse me now while I gouge my eyes out with a spoon.
Quit watching before it finished running to a likely miserable ending. Chopped up, incoherent mess. Waste of what little time I did spend watching it.
Not even Corey and his band of merry 'Angels' creating multiple accounts to increase the overall score, can prevent this one sinking to the depths of Razzie award territory.
There is absolutely no originality in this movie what-so-ever, so i can't understand why the 10 star reviews are rating it as some kind of original 'cult classic' ?? *sarcasm*
Cinematography and art design is good, but it's totally wasted in a complete mish mash blade knockoff / buffalo bill wannabe story and script. Seriously, I kid you not, the final scene is an EXACT rip off from Blade.
It's hard to judge the acting, because the script is so cringe worthy! eg 'I'm gonna kill em all' - 'This is a city of sinners' *BLEURGH* The only decent stand out performance for me was the latino girl. At the other end of the spectrum was Feldman, it was as if the director said ' Ok Corey, I want you to offend every transvestite in America, show me what you got '
.... NEXT
There is absolutely no originality in this movie what-so-ever, so i can't understand why the 10 star reviews are rating it as some kind of original 'cult classic' ?? *sarcasm*
Cinematography and art design is good, but it's totally wasted in a complete mish mash blade knockoff / buffalo bill wannabe story and script. Seriously, I kid you not, the final scene is an EXACT rip off from Blade.
It's hard to judge the acting, because the script is so cringe worthy! eg 'I'm gonna kill em all' - 'This is a city of sinners' *BLEURGH* The only decent stand out performance for me was the latino girl. At the other end of the spectrum was Feldman, it was as if the director said ' Ok Corey, I want you to offend every transvestite in America, show me what you got '
.... NEXT
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesCourtney Gains and Corey Feldman appeared in The 'Burbs (1989).
- GaffesIn the opening scene, the car is shown with license plate 4Q49901, but as the car comes to a stop it reads 4KZ0846.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Corbin Nash?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 34 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 16:9 HD
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Corbin Nash (2018) officially released in Canada in English?
Répondre