Corbin Nash

Quit watching before it finished running to a likely miserable ending. Chopped up, incoherent mess. Waste of what little time I did spend watching it.

I was hoping that my first review would be a positive one about a great movie. Sadly, that wasn't to be. This one forced my hand and demanded that I sit down and warn the public about how bad it is.

I was really looking forward to watching this. I wanted it to be a really good, but after 15 mins I was sorely disappointed. I kept hoping it would get better, but it never did.

Everything about it was wrong. Bad script, bad acting, bad cinematography, bad direction, and that mortal sin, overacting. As a lover of this genre I am begging you, please don't bother with this terrible, terrible movie.

If I could find the people who gave this such a high rating, I would lock them in a room with everyone who was involved with making this, and make them watch it for the rest of their lives.

I gave it 2 stars because I'm sure there are worse movies out there.

Excuse me now while I gouge my eyes out with a spoon.

Not even Corey and his band of merry 'Angels' creating multiple accounts to increase the overall score, can prevent this one sinking to the depths of Razzie award territory.

There is absolutely no originality in this movie what-so-ever, so i can't understand why the 10 star reviews are rating it as some kind of original 'cult classic' ?? *sarcasm*

Cinematography and art design is good, but it's totally wasted in a complete mish mash blade knockoff / buffalo bill wannabe story and script. Seriously, I kid you not, the final scene is an EXACT rip off from Blade.

It's hard to judge the acting, because the script is so cringe worthy! eg 'I'm gonna kill em all' - 'This is a city of sinners' *BLEURGH* The only decent stand out performance for me was the latino girl. At the other end of the spectrum was Feldman, it was as if the director said ' Ok Corey, I want you to offend every transvestite in America, show me what you got '

.... NEXT

The movie was not good, the writing was poor. honestly this movie was not half as good as the worst lostboys movie, i think the worst one got a 4.6. like i said honest. its not the worst movie i've ever seen, but its like miles from being decent. feldman is poor, his trans-whatever vampire is just nonsense. what is wrong with him. how the producers ever got mcdowell and hauer to make cameos in this movie is beyond me. must have a slow decade.

Awful does not start to tell you the let down. Where in the universe do these reviewers giving 9 and 10 come from? One even wrote "best movie of the year". You got to be kidding me!

I admit, the ploy is always the same: early on upon movie release, all these people show up with lots and lots of standard / non sensical praises extolling the worse movies. Technically, this trick is as old as online reviews: it fortunately should not fool anybody. Well, except me this time... I saw the IMDB average 6.something rating, thought why not? and went for it.

Well, that was a mistake: this movie was like a bad dream with nothing to redeem it. A bad movie with all the ingredients: the misfits vampires, the violent weirdos, a meh! vague story, a bout of MMA, lots of blood, a tiny touch of gothic atmosphere and above all, Ladies and Gentlemen, real baaaad acting. If you have 1:35 hour to waste, here is the occasion.