Fake
- Série télévisée
- 2024–
Keddie joue le rôle d'une écrivaine qui rencontre le propriétaire d'un ranch, Wenham, sur une application de rencontre. Pensant qu'il est idéal, elle s'engage avec lui, mais découvre qu'il a... Tout lireKeddie joue le rôle d'une écrivaine qui rencontre le propriétaire d'un ranch, Wenham, sur une application de rencontre. Pensant qu'il est idéal, elle s'engage avec lui, mais découvre qu'il a fait une fausse déclaration.Keddie joue le rôle d'une écrivaine qui rencontre le propriétaire d'un ranch, Wenham, sur une application de rencontre. Pensant qu'il est idéal, elle s'engage avec lui, mais découvre qu'il a fait une fausse déclaration.
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires et 7 nominations au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
The production values on this series are good, the story gets you intrigued early on, mainly from the 'what's going on' perspective.
The obvious point that such an educated, successful, attractive woman is so lonely, is something you need to get over, plus the fact that she's so desperate to meet a man, she's prepared to drop all doubts and oddities associated with him, just to get him.
Once the odd behaviours grow the story slowly develops, behind lovely Australian backdrops and city scapes, the heroine's fears and questions pop up and she looks for answers, again why she's so determined to hang onto this man is a bit of a mystery.
Things I found annoying, the need to insert alcohol into many scenes, the fragility of the female character, the sinister male lead, the gay but oh so fun friends, everyone seems wealthy and in luxury, but often unhappy, all very typical of Australian shows, so typical you fight the impulse to fast forward occasionally to get on with the story, so at times it gets 'dull', you want it to develop and it doesn't.
The obvious point that such an educated, successful, attractive woman is so lonely, is something you need to get over, plus the fact that she's so desperate to meet a man, she's prepared to drop all doubts and oddities associated with him, just to get him.
Once the odd behaviours grow the story slowly develops, behind lovely Australian backdrops and city scapes, the heroine's fears and questions pop up and she looks for answers, again why she's so determined to hang onto this man is a bit of a mystery.
Things I found annoying, the need to insert alcohol into many scenes, the fragility of the female character, the sinister male lead, the gay but oh so fun friends, everyone seems wealthy and in luxury, but often unhappy, all very typical of Australian shows, so typical you fight the impulse to fast forward occasionally to get on with the story, so at times it gets 'dull', you want it to develop and it doesn't.
Can an entire show be foreshadowing? Can every single moment be foreshadowing? Can every single thing be framed entirely explicitly as foreshadowing? This show may be going for a world record or something, trying to make every single second, from the very opening shots, be Foreshadowing. Can a show that is entirely foreshadowing also feature the worst performances by two great actors, entirely miscast, with No chemistry, and the most unhappy and miserable sex scene in the history of everything?
Yes. Yes yes yes. All yes.
I have never not enjoyed Asher Keddie, before. I have always respected David Wenham, before. This is trash. I think the writer was trying to make herself look better at having Always Suspected Things, but it makes her a boring anxious character that you can't sympathise with who has No Arc. Crap.
Yes. Yes yes yes. All yes.
I have never not enjoyed Asher Keddie, before. I have always respected David Wenham, before. This is trash. I think the writer was trying to make herself look better at having Always Suspected Things, but it makes her a boring anxious character that you can't sympathise with who has No Arc. Crap.
This series about a journalist Birdie (Asher Keddie) who dates a compulsive liar and fantasist Joe (David Wenham) has a great premise but its pace is sluggish. And why all the moody focus on Birdie being devastated, anxious and morose as she reels from yet another betrayal from her deadbeat boyfriend? There needs to be more action. Maybe it would have been better to focus on the search to find fellow victims of Joe, and to find out who he really was. In any case, when Birdie does find out something bad about Joe, she tends to be sad, but then keeps going out with him! After five or six no-shows to family birthdays and weddings, and umpteen cancellations of dates, most people would call it quits, but it defies belief that she would put up with this much rejection and lying. If Birdie had fought back a little more, it would have been a better drama. The series is interesting in that it points out that on dates, we cannot predict who the other person might turn out to be. And that Birdie all too readily believes or forgives her lover's bad behaviour because she fears being alone.
Maybe also it would have helped to see a little of the boyfriend's perspective. How he rationalises being so opaque and stuffing Birdie around.
Maybe also it would have helped to see a little of the boyfriend's perspective. How he rationalises being so opaque and stuffing Birdie around.
Fake is entertaining and definitely had the binge factor to make me keep watching. I wanted to know how it ended and I enjoyed the switch to a different POV and the over all style of storytelling BUT...
1) The main character, Birdie, while really well acted by a talented actress, was just infuriating. Her stupidity and weakness became annoying and I know this is based on a true story, I know it really happened and romance scams happen all the time but I just thought any smart sensible woman would run a mile. Maybe it was because the romance scammer guy was played as a villain from the start. The actor was kind of creepy and so it was hard to believe she would be conned by him.
2) Otherwise first rate production values and performances were marred by the awful dreamlike repetitive sequences where lines were played over and over in voice over as Birdie's thoughts or memories. It felt like budget film school nonsense and really let down the production. It was used as a conceit way too many times.
I wasn't at all keen on the musical choices and why was the Tiger song used twice in different episodes? That felt like they couldn't afford another track. It was insanely annoying as was the Love Kitten track. Just poor musical choices and the sequence where Birdie danced to the latter was cringe.
7/10 is kind but I did binge it and I did enjoy it mostly aside from those few moments of terrible directing choices.
1) The main character, Birdie, while really well acted by a talented actress, was just infuriating. Her stupidity and weakness became annoying and I know this is based on a true story, I know it really happened and romance scams happen all the time but I just thought any smart sensible woman would run a mile. Maybe it was because the romance scammer guy was played as a villain from the start. The actor was kind of creepy and so it was hard to believe she would be conned by him.
2) Otherwise first rate production values and performances were marred by the awful dreamlike repetitive sequences where lines were played over and over in voice over as Birdie's thoughts or memories. It felt like budget film school nonsense and really let down the production. It was used as a conceit way too many times.
I wasn't at all keen on the musical choices and why was the Tiger song used twice in different episodes? That felt like they couldn't afford another track. It was insanely annoying as was the Love Kitten track. Just poor musical choices and the sequence where Birdie danced to the latter was cringe.
7/10 is kind but I did binge it and I did enjoy it mostly aside from those few moments of terrible directing choices.
The key to this working is a credible male lead ( in what is a difficult nuanced role to pull off convincingly). David Wenham didn't, at all. At almost 60 he is for a start too old, too crepey-skinned. His character was creepy, he was given a lizardy persona, unfortunately Joe was NOT what he must be.
Hot.
Who is craving to get in this creaky, rather plodding, aging, man's bed?
Apparently a whole slew of beautiful intelligent women, all taken in and enraptured to the point of slavish devotion . 60 emails with heart rending tales of seducer Joe!!!
Please. No.
None of us watching Joe were craving to be in bed with him either, btw (imagine here a shudder indicating skin crawling at the thought lol).
The writing was off for Joe, the character needed way more finesse in language, charisma, good looks, and sex appeal, delivered by an actor with compelling, utterly irresistible BDE, and way more sympathetic outside of the scene in the church where we see his pain. That was good, well done.
That first encounter at Atons bar ..."do you want to get out of here?" The look that is then exchanged between them as Joe agrees means, as every single adult watching knows, let's ***k. His sliding off into the night outside was the beginning of a mountain of sleight of hand by Joe's character that was absurdly clunky, as to be an insult to the intelligence.
Asher Keddie is terrific, she holds this together. Her character is far better written and presented than her counterpart, we are provided with sufficient context to see why this one woman with her history anxiety and pressures wanted so much for this to work. She was believable in a narrative where nothing else important was believable.
It's an easy reasonably engaging binge, but could have been so much more immersive, tantalising, heartrending.
A missed opportunity, should have been a 10.
Hot.
Who is craving to get in this creaky, rather plodding, aging, man's bed?
Apparently a whole slew of beautiful intelligent women, all taken in and enraptured to the point of slavish devotion . 60 emails with heart rending tales of seducer Joe!!!
Please. No.
None of us watching Joe were craving to be in bed with him either, btw (imagine here a shudder indicating skin crawling at the thought lol).
The writing was off for Joe, the character needed way more finesse in language, charisma, good looks, and sex appeal, delivered by an actor with compelling, utterly irresistible BDE, and way more sympathetic outside of the scene in the church where we see his pain. That was good, well done.
That first encounter at Atons bar ..."do you want to get out of here?" The look that is then exchanged between them as Joe agrees means, as every single adult watching knows, let's ***k. His sliding off into the night outside was the beginning of a mountain of sleight of hand by Joe's character that was absurdly clunky, as to be an insult to the intelligence.
Asher Keddie is terrific, she holds this together. Her character is far better written and presented than her counterpart, we are provided with sufficient context to see why this one woman with her history anxiety and pressures wanted so much for this to work. She was believable in a narrative where nothing else important was believable.
It's an easy reasonably engaging binge, but could have been so much more immersive, tantalising, heartrending.
A missed opportunity, should have been a 10.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesBased on journalist's Stephanie Wood's "Fake: A Startling True Story"
- ConnexionsFeatured in The 7PM Project: Épisode datant du 4 juillet 2024 (2024)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Подделка
- Lieux de tournage
- Victoria, Australie(location)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant