Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueAn unconventional anti-terrorist operative must defy his bosses in order to foil a devastating attack on his nation in this action thriller.An unconventional anti-terrorist operative must defy his bosses in order to foil a devastating attack on his nation in this action thriller.An unconventional anti-terrorist operative must defy his bosses in order to foil a devastating attack on his nation in this action thriller.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Avis à la une
Summary:
This film tried to be deep and important. It started with interesting ideas. But the story got confusing and didn't make sense. The ending was pointless. It wasted its good start. I was let down.
Siddu acted great, and the heroine was perfect. But the writer and story felt crazy. Even though the action and directing were good, the story ruined it. A waste of good performances.
Actual words about the movie
This film really wanted to be important. You could tell it was trying to say something deep and meaningful right from the start. The initial ideas it presented were actually quite interesting, and they made you think the movie was going somewhere worthwhile. It felt like it was building towards a big reveal or a powerful message.
What really stood out were the performances. Siddu's acting was truly great. He brought a lot of emotion and believability to his character. The heroine also played her role perfectly. She understood her character and made her feel real and engaging. You could see the talent of these actors shining through.
However, as the movie went on, the story started to lose its way. It felt like the writer and whoever came up with the story had completely lost their direction. The plot became confusing, and things started happening that didn't make much sense. It was as if they had a good starting point but then didn't know how to connect the dots or where they wanted to end up. It honestly felt like the people behind the story might have been out of their minds, or at least had some very strange ideas that didn't translate well onto the screen.
It's a shame because even the directing was quite good. The movie looked well-made, and the way the scenes were put together was often skillful. The action sequences and stunts were also well-executed and exciting to watch. These elements showed that there was definitely talent involved in making the film.
But in the end, all the good acting, decent directing, and exciting stunts couldn't save the movie from its fundamental flaw: a completely meaningless conclusion. After investing your time and trying to follow the story, the ending just falls flat. It doesn't tie anything together, and it leaves you wondering what the point of it all was. Any potential for a meaningful message or a satisfying resolution is completely lost. It feels like the movie started with a purpose but ultimately ended up saying nothing at all. It's a disappointing experience because you can see the potential that was there, but it was ultimately wasted by a poorly written and nonsensical story.
This film tried to be deep and important. It started with interesting ideas. But the story got confusing and didn't make sense. The ending was pointless. It wasted its good start. I was let down.
Siddu acted great, and the heroine was perfect. But the writer and story felt crazy. Even though the action and directing were good, the story ruined it. A waste of good performances.
Actual words about the movie
This film really wanted to be important. You could tell it was trying to say something deep and meaningful right from the start. The initial ideas it presented were actually quite interesting, and they made you think the movie was going somewhere worthwhile. It felt like it was building towards a big reveal or a powerful message.
What really stood out were the performances. Siddu's acting was truly great. He brought a lot of emotion and believability to his character. The heroine also played her role perfectly. She understood her character and made her feel real and engaging. You could see the talent of these actors shining through.
However, as the movie went on, the story started to lose its way. It felt like the writer and whoever came up with the story had completely lost their direction. The plot became confusing, and things started happening that didn't make much sense. It was as if they had a good starting point but then didn't know how to connect the dots or where they wanted to end up. It honestly felt like the people behind the story might have been out of their minds, or at least had some very strange ideas that didn't translate well onto the screen.
It's a shame because even the directing was quite good. The movie looked well-made, and the way the scenes were put together was often skillful. The action sequences and stunts were also well-executed and exciting to watch. These elements showed that there was definitely talent involved in making the film.
But in the end, all the good acting, decent directing, and exciting stunts couldn't save the movie from its fundamental flaw: a completely meaningless conclusion. After investing your time and trying to follow the story, the ending just falls flat. It doesn't tie anything together, and it leaves you wondering what the point of it all was. Any potential for a meaningful message or a satisfying resolution is completely lost. It feels like the movie started with a purpose but ultimately ended up saying nothing at all. It's a disappointing experience because you can see the potential that was there, but it was ultimately wasted by a poorly written and nonsensical story.
What do you get when you bring together
atrocious action
directionless direction, and
a pointless meaningless script
no points for guessing
You get the telugu movie 'Jack'
I am a movie buff, and over the decades have sat through very mediocre stuff being passed off as cinema, but the current crop of filmmakers make the bad movies of the yesteryears seem good in comparison
i couldn't sit through 20 minutes of the 'movie' as i had developed a migraine
watch at your own risk of developing dis-taste and disliking for the movies as a genre of entertainment
I am still astounded and dumbfounded at how these movie scripts and ideas get funded in the first place.
You get the telugu movie 'Jack'
I am a movie buff, and over the decades have sat through very mediocre stuff being passed off as cinema, but the current crop of filmmakers make the bad movies of the yesteryears seem good in comparison
i couldn't sit through 20 minutes of the 'movie' as i had developed a migraine
watch at your own risk of developing dis-taste and disliking for the movies as a genre of entertainment
I am still astounded and dumbfounded at how these movie scripts and ideas get funded in the first place.
I thought Siddhu would pull off another decent hit, but was truly disappointed.
Old, predictable story. Good actors like Siddhu, Prakash Raj have been completely wasted. About the female lead - not sure what purpose the role actually added to the movie - I mean if you claim yourself to be a private eye, then you should be really dumb with the kind of actions that the role was made to do!!! The writers have to be flogged for writing such a role.
Comedy was very sad. A few laughs but overall pretty sad comedy. I went to watch this movie not expecting any logic or rationale but for pure comedy. Sad to say this movie just did not meet even basic expectations.
I'm not sure why such talented technicians, movie makers come up with such scripts. They have to understand that new age audience have been served such brilliant content that movies like these standout as sore thumbs.
Old, predictable story. Good actors like Siddhu, Prakash Raj have been completely wasted. About the female lead - not sure what purpose the role actually added to the movie - I mean if you claim yourself to be a private eye, then you should be really dumb with the kind of actions that the role was made to do!!! The writers have to be flogged for writing such a role.
Comedy was very sad. A few laughs but overall pretty sad comedy. I went to watch this movie not expecting any logic or rationale but for pure comedy. Sad to say this movie just did not meet even basic expectations.
I'm not sure why such talented technicians, movie makers come up with such scripts. They have to understand that new age audience have been served such brilliant content that movies like these standout as sore thumbs.
There are a very few movies in which you can't really tell what's going on with the plot and this is one such movie. From the word go everything feels random and confusing. It felt like everyone was trying too hard to make the audience laugh and it's not working out. The reason I went to watch the movie was because I liked Tillu series and also I am a fan of Bomarillu and always hope one day Bhaskar will make a movie like that again. Totally disappointed. I walked out of the theatre half way through.
I feel it's a waste of time to write about the plot or the actors or anything related to the movie.
I feel it's a waste of time to write about the plot or the actors or anything related to the movie.
Movie Review: "Jack" (Telugu) - A Misfire from Bommarillu Bhaskar
"Jack" is one of those films that leaves you wondering how a seasoned director like Bommarillu Bhaskar, known for emotionally rich and family-oriented films, could come up with something so disappointing. After watching the film, I found myself questioning not just the story, but every major decision behind the making of this movie. From casting to screenplay, from acting to editing - everything feels like a missed opportunity.
Let's begin with the most obvious problem: the hero's performance. The lead actor, whose name is relatively new in the industry, delivers one of the most forgettable performances I've seen in recent times. His expressions are forced, his dialogue delivery is flat, and his screen presence is utterly lacking. It's hard to connect with the protagonist or feel any empathy toward his journey because the actor himself doesn't seem to believe in what he's doing. A hero must carry the emotional weight of a film, but here, he simply drags it down.
Then comes Prakash Raj, a seasoned actor known for his powerful screen presence and emotional intensity. But in "Jack," he goes completely overboard. His acting feels theatrical and unnecessarily loud. Instead of enhancing the emotional quotient of the movie, he becomes a source of irritation. His role is written in a way that is supposed to be impactful, maybe even heart-touching, but the execution is poor, and his overacting ruins whatever little potential the role had.
The storyline is another letdown. The film doesn't seem to have a clear direction. It tries to be a love story, a family drama, a self-discovery journey, and a commercial entertainer - all at once - but fails to excel in any department. The narrative is painfully predictable and lacks emotional depth. Scenes that are meant to be dramatic feel artificial and manipulative. There's no emotional hook to keep the audience invested.
Dialogues are bland and repetitive. Instead of making us think or feel, they often make us cringe. Attempts at humor fall flat. Even supposedly serious scenes feel unintentionally funny. It's almost like the writers forgot what emotion they were trying to convey in each scene.
The direction by Bommarillu Bhaskar is shockingly weak. Known for giving us heartfelt films like "Bommarillu" and "Parugu," one expects a certain emotional intelligence and sensitivity in his work. But "Jack" lacks any of that charm or maturity. The characters are one-dimensional, the screenplay is messy, and the pacing is painfully slow. Bhaskar seems to have lost his touch in connecting with the audience. It's hard to believe the same director who gave us Siddu and Genelia's lovable chemistry in "Bommarillu" has now directed this chaotic, soulless film.
Music and background score are forgettable. None of the songs stay with you. They appear randomly and often interrupt the flow of the story, which is already struggling. The background music tries to add emotion where the scenes fail but ends up sounding like a desperate attempt to force feelings onto the audience.
Cinematography is decent in parts, but there's nothing particularly unique or visually striking. The locations are standard, the framing lacks creativity, and the visuals do little to elevate the storytelling.
Editing is another weak point. Scenes linger for too long, transitions feel abrupt, and overall pacing is inconsistent. Some scenes could have easily been cut without affecting the story, while others needed better buildup.
Even the supporting cast is underutilized. The heroine's role is underwritten, and there is zero chemistry between the lead pair. The romantic track feels forced and rushed. There is no natural development of their relationship, making it hard to root for them.
If I had to sum it up, "Jack" is a film that had potential but is marred by poor execution on all fronts. It's a perfect example of how even talented directors can go off track when the basics are ignored. A good film starts with a good script, but here, everything feels half-baked.
As a viewer, I felt no emotional connection, no excitement, and certainly no satisfaction after watching this film. It tested my patience and made me appreciate the value of storytelling done right. I wouldn't recommend this movie to anyone, unless they're curious about how a film can go so wrong in so many ways.
In conclusion, "Jack" is a disaster of a film, made worse by bad acting, a weak story, and confused direction. Bommarillu Bhaskar may have taken a big risk with this one, but unfortunately, it didn't pay off. If anything, it serves as a reminder that name and experience alone can't save a film without heart and soul.
"Jack" is one of those films that leaves you wondering how a seasoned director like Bommarillu Bhaskar, known for emotionally rich and family-oriented films, could come up with something so disappointing. After watching the film, I found myself questioning not just the story, but every major decision behind the making of this movie. From casting to screenplay, from acting to editing - everything feels like a missed opportunity.
Let's begin with the most obvious problem: the hero's performance. The lead actor, whose name is relatively new in the industry, delivers one of the most forgettable performances I've seen in recent times. His expressions are forced, his dialogue delivery is flat, and his screen presence is utterly lacking. It's hard to connect with the protagonist or feel any empathy toward his journey because the actor himself doesn't seem to believe in what he's doing. A hero must carry the emotional weight of a film, but here, he simply drags it down.
Then comes Prakash Raj, a seasoned actor known for his powerful screen presence and emotional intensity. But in "Jack," he goes completely overboard. His acting feels theatrical and unnecessarily loud. Instead of enhancing the emotional quotient of the movie, he becomes a source of irritation. His role is written in a way that is supposed to be impactful, maybe even heart-touching, but the execution is poor, and his overacting ruins whatever little potential the role had.
The storyline is another letdown. The film doesn't seem to have a clear direction. It tries to be a love story, a family drama, a self-discovery journey, and a commercial entertainer - all at once - but fails to excel in any department. The narrative is painfully predictable and lacks emotional depth. Scenes that are meant to be dramatic feel artificial and manipulative. There's no emotional hook to keep the audience invested.
Dialogues are bland and repetitive. Instead of making us think or feel, they often make us cringe. Attempts at humor fall flat. Even supposedly serious scenes feel unintentionally funny. It's almost like the writers forgot what emotion they were trying to convey in each scene.
The direction by Bommarillu Bhaskar is shockingly weak. Known for giving us heartfelt films like "Bommarillu" and "Parugu," one expects a certain emotional intelligence and sensitivity in his work. But "Jack" lacks any of that charm or maturity. The characters are one-dimensional, the screenplay is messy, and the pacing is painfully slow. Bhaskar seems to have lost his touch in connecting with the audience. It's hard to believe the same director who gave us Siddu and Genelia's lovable chemistry in "Bommarillu" has now directed this chaotic, soulless film.
Music and background score are forgettable. None of the songs stay with you. They appear randomly and often interrupt the flow of the story, which is already struggling. The background music tries to add emotion where the scenes fail but ends up sounding like a desperate attempt to force feelings onto the audience.
Cinematography is decent in parts, but there's nothing particularly unique or visually striking. The locations are standard, the framing lacks creativity, and the visuals do little to elevate the storytelling.
Editing is another weak point. Scenes linger for too long, transitions feel abrupt, and overall pacing is inconsistent. Some scenes could have easily been cut without affecting the story, while others needed better buildup.
Even the supporting cast is underutilized. The heroine's role is underwritten, and there is zero chemistry between the lead pair. The romantic track feels forced and rushed. There is no natural development of their relationship, making it hard to root for them.
If I had to sum it up, "Jack" is a film that had potential but is marred by poor execution on all fronts. It's a perfect example of how even talented directors can go off track when the basics are ignored. A good film starts with a good script, but here, everything feels half-baked.
As a viewer, I felt no emotional connection, no excitement, and certainly no satisfaction after watching this film. It tested my patience and made me appreciate the value of storytelling done right. I wouldn't recommend this movie to anyone, unless they're curious about how a film can go so wrong in so many ways.
In conclusion, "Jack" is a disaster of a film, made worse by bad acting, a weak story, and confused direction. Bommarillu Bhaskar may have taken a big risk with this one, but unfortunately, it didn't pay off. If anything, it serves as a reminder that name and experience alone can't save a film without heart and soul.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 41 738 $US
- Durée
- 2h 13min(133 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant