De la recherche sur le clonage humain à une chute scandaleuse, suivez la vie et l'œuvre du scientifique coréen le plus célèbre, Hwang Woo-suk.De la recherche sur le clonage humain à une chute scandaleuse, suivez la vie et l'œuvre du scientifique coréen le plus célèbre, Hwang Woo-suk.De la recherche sur le clonage humain à une chute scandaleuse, suivez la vie et l'œuvre du scientifique coréen le plus célèbre, Hwang Woo-suk.
- Récompenses
- 1 nomination au total
Hwang Woo-Suk
- Self - Stem Cell Scientist
- (as Dr. Hwang Wook-Suk)
Paul Root Wolpe
- Self - Former Head of Bioethics, NASA
- (as Dr. Paul Root Wolpe)
Alex Tinson
- Self - Director of Research, Presidential Camel Center
- (as Dr. Alex Tinson)
Alexander Ruebben
- Self - Interventional Radiologist
- (as Dr. Alexander Ruebben)
Ryu Young-joon
- Self - Former Researcher, Seoul National Universitv
- (as Prof. Ryu Young-joon)
Sarah Chan
- Self - Bioethicist, University of Edinburgh
- (as Dr. Sarah Chan)
Chin Jung-Kwon
- Self - Political Commentator
- (as Prof. Chin Jung-kwon)
Kim Jea-Un
- Self - Pastor
- (as Pastor Kim Jea-Un)
Lee Jea-Suk
- Self - Dr. Hwang Supporter
- (as Lee Jeasuk)
George W. Bush
- Self - 43rd President of the United States
- (images d'archives)
Kim Dae-jung
- Self - Former President of South Korea
- (images d'archives)
Susan Dentzer
- Self - Health Correspondent, PBS NewsHour
- (images d'archives)
Kim Hyeon-yi
- Self - Son of Pastor Kim Jea-Un
- (images d'archives)
Jong-Il Kim
- Self - Former Leader of North Korea
- (images d'archives)
Jim Lehrer
- Self - Host, PBS NewsHour
- (images d'archives)
Avis à la une
How much science is too much science? There's always the question of science versus faith, and while the former is seen through the lens of being authentic and factual, even science needs to be put through the litmus test to see the level of ethics (or the lack of it) involved. Here's the story of a disgraced scientist whose cloning ambitions took the world by storm, eventually succumbing to the fundamental flaw of human greed. The best thing about the piece is getting to hear from the disgraced scientist himself, delving into the hows and the whys. The "whys" are pretty obvious, but the "hows" are fascinating. He is still valued as an individual of great interest, with people revering him for the scientific leaps he has supposedly enabled. At least, he is in the right place (UAE) where all sorts of expensive scientific disruptions (such as cloud seeding, desalination) are somehow made possible. He will continue to get the financial support he requires to keep his "experiments" running.
This documentary was all over the place. Ultimately, very unsatisfying.
In some kind of movie format, we jump back and forth in time.
It felt like we actually know little of what happened with the forging of the research. Either that or the makers of the documentary didn't understand.
Overall, a poor execution, which is a shame given the importance of the subject.
The scenes with the gay dude who cloned his dog was pathetic, and reflected poorly on people who actually love their dogs and have the means to clone them.
The UAE part was interesting but cartoonish as well with some Arab wearing sunglasses in a dark lab, with no satisfying explanation of what the doctor is doing there.
Super underwhelming. Poorly researched and executed.
In some kind of movie format, we jump back and forth in time.
It felt like we actually know little of what happened with the forging of the research. Either that or the makers of the documentary didn't understand.
Overall, a poor execution, which is a shame given the importance of the subject.
The scenes with the gay dude who cloned his dog was pathetic, and reflected poorly on people who actually love their dogs and have the means to clone them.
The UAE part was interesting but cartoonish as well with some Arab wearing sunglasses in a dark lab, with no satisfying explanation of what the doctor is doing there.
Super underwhelming. Poorly researched and executed.
No pun intended - I reckon there is way more going on than Dolly ... the sheep that is, not any living or dead person. Just in case, you may have gone there. Have to admit, that name can trigger different memories or recognition for some people.
That all said, the movie/documentary here, is quite solid and knows what it wants to tell you the viewer. Structure is well done and you have a build up - even if you may know where it seems to lead. Moral questions have to be answered ... and is the ultimate goal enough to leave some of them unanswered and really just be focused on what we want to achieve. An interesting movie to watch - even more so if actually have interest in what it wants to tell us ...
That all said, the movie/documentary here, is quite solid and knows what it wants to tell you the viewer. Structure is well done and you have a build up - even if you may know where it seems to lead. Moral questions have to be answered ... and is the ultimate goal enough to leave some of them unanswered and really just be focused on what we want to achieve. An interesting movie to watch - even more so if actually have interest in what it wants to tell us ...
This is a documentary that expects you to feel something, likely outrage and disgust, but I admit I did not feel much of anything while watching this. It's the story of a man who ascended to the top of Korean Society by committing fraud, and because it was academic fraud, was not put in prison. Now it seems he spends his time on expensive projects to reanimate mastodons and long dead but very expensive prize candles. It seems he was touched by a bit of hubris, and promised things that he couldn't possibly deliver. But the science has left him behind, and even if he had been punished more harshly, that would not have been any different. This was a bit of a waste of time.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesWang Wo-Suk was born January 29 1953 in Chungcheon Province, South Korea. He was a professor at Seoul National University (SNU) but was dismissed 2006 after he had been found guilty in having fabricated data in two papers. He has also been indicted for breach of ethic laws and fraud with research funds.
- ConnexionsReferences Frankenstein (1931)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is King of Clones?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Klonların Kralı
- Lieux de tournage
- Abu Dhabi(on location)
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 25 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was King of Clones (2023) officially released in India in English?
Répondre