36 Days

Web Series Review: 36 Days Streaming on Sony LIV!!

Directed by Vishal Furia and Produced by Applause Entertainment along with BBC studios , 36 days is a crime thriller web series which takes viewers on a roller coaster ride in a story filled with love, lust , murder and intrigue!!

The arrival of a mysterious stranger Farah ( Neha Sharma) in a gated bungalow community in Goa sparks off a series of bizarre events , causing chaos and mayhem in the lives of the residents whose lives seem hunky dory on the outside , but r living with dark secrets buried deep in their hearts!!

Coming to the cast : Chandan Roy Sanyal as Tony, the lecherous & crass owner of the gated community impresses you the most . You will feel disgusted by his homophobic behaviour yet fall in love with his acting !! The star of the web series for sure 😊

Neha Sharma has acted decently as the mysterious stranger giving a restrained performance but definitely not her best .

Shruti Seth & Purab Kohli as the dysfunctional power couple have done well in their respective roles.

Amruta Khanwilkar as the loud, greedy and garrulous Lalita is funny in her own way. The talented Sharib Hashmi as her husband has played the role of a cuckolded hubby well.

Sushant Digwikar as the transgender Tarun/ Tanya has an important role and is impressive.

Shernaz Patel, Faizal Rashid & Kenneth Desai - weakest links in this story and their tale of woes takes away a lot from the narrative!! Cudve been better.

Overall the series moves in a very leisurely manner without any major twists till the final 3 episodes where the action actually happens.

U might also find the twist in the end , an anticlimax.

An interesting concept where the story moves in reverse - From the time the murder is committed (1st episode) to the reasons behind it ( going 36 days behind - 8th episode) . Not bad .. yet kuch toh missing lagta hai ... Not gripping enough,with lots of boring sub plots and loose ends in the script!!

The stellar starcast is not utilised fully!!

Going with 2.5/5 for this one.. adios 🙂

#sanjuzzreviews #36days #sonyliv #webseriesreviews #NehaSharma #ShrutiSeth #PurabKohli #SharibHashmi #faizalrashid #ChandanRoySanyal.

It's quite perplexing how certain projects manage to come to fruition, especially those that, in hindsight, seem destined to flop. This raises the question: who are the masterminds behind convincing producers and financiers to invest in such endeavors?

The process involves numerous stakeholders, each with their own motivations and perspectives, leading to a collective effort that can sometimes result in a disappointing outcome. Let's delve into this scenario to understand the dynamics at play.

The Genesis of a Project The inception of any creative project often starts with a pitch. This pitch is usually crafted by writers, directors, or producers who are passionate about their idea. They weave a compelling narrative that highlights the potential of their project. Sometimes, the pitch is so persuasive that it captures the imagination of the financiers and producers, despite potential red flags that may not be immediately apparent. The allure of discovering the next big hit can be incredibly tempting.

The Role of Producers and Financiers Producers and financiers play a crucial role in green-lighting a project. They assess the pitch based on various factors such as the market trends, potential return on investment, and the credibility of the team behind the project. However, they are also human and can be swayed by charisma, past successes of the creators, or the desire to be part of something innovative. Sometimes, decisions are made on gut feeling rather than hard data, which can lead to risky ventures.

The Collective Effort Once a project is approved, a multitude of people become involved, each contributing their skills and expertise. This includes writers, directors, actors, editors, and countless others who bring the vision to life. Each of these individuals may be highly skilled and respected in their own right. However, the final product is a sum of its parts, and if there are flaws in the initial concept or execution, even the best talent can struggle to create something worthwhile.

The Editor's Dilemma Editors, in particular, bear the brunt of trying to piece together the narrative from often disjointed and sometimes subpar raw material. They may find themselves trying to salvage a story that doesn't quite make sense or isn't engaging. The editing process can be likened to trying to assemble a coherent puzzle from pieces that don't fit. This can be incredibly frustrating, especially when working with a cast of good actors whose performances are undermined by a weak script or poor direction.

Public Reception and PR Public relations (PR) and marketing are crucial in shaping the public's perception of a project. A strong PR campaign can sometimes make up for a project's shortcomings by generating buzz and excitement. However, when a project fails to invest adequately in PR, it loses a critical opportunity to build a positive narrative before its release. This can be detrimental, especially if the project's quality is already in question.

In the case at hand, the lack of PR investment is telling. It suggests either a lack of confidence in the project from the outset or a significant oversight. Without a robust PR strategy, even good actors and creative efforts can fall flat, as the project fails to reach its intended audience effectively.

The Artist's Perspective It's particularly disheartening when the artists associated with a project do not speak positively about it. This could be due to several reasons: dissatisfaction with the final product, poor working conditions, or disagreements during the production process. When artists, who are usually the face of the project, refrain from endorsing it, it sends a strong signal to the audience about the project's quality.

Are We Making CID or Recreating Crime?

The analogy to "CID" or recreating crime suggests a repetitive, formulaic approach that lacks creativity and originality. "CID," a long-running Indian TV show, is known for its predictable crime-solving episodes. If a new project feels like a rehash of old, worn-out ideas without bringing anything new to the table, it's bound to be met with criticism. Audiences crave fresh, engaging content, and when they are served something that feels recycled, it can lead to disappointment and disinterest.

Conclusion In summary, the journey from pitch to screen involves many layers and stakeholders, each with their motivations and constraints. While some projects shine through due to a combination of brilliant ideas, effective execution, and strong PR, others falter because of weaknesses in one or more of these areas. Convincing producers and financiers to invest in a project is an art in itself, but it doesn't guarantee success. The real challenge lies in delivering a product that resonates with the audience, and without the right blend of innovation, execution, and promotion, even the best intentions can result in a collective waste of time and resources.

If you like suspensive thrillers, don't miss this one.

Lots of twists and turns and a roller coster ride.

The writer has so well played with emotions, you keep guessing till the end.

If you like suspensive thrillers, don't miss this one.

Lots of twists and turns and a roller coster ride.

The writer has so well played with emotions, you keep guessing till the end.

If you like suspensive thrillers, don't miss this one.

Lots of twists and turns and a roller coster ride.

The writer has so well played with emotions, you keep guessing till the end.

If you like suspensive thrillers, don't miss this one.

Lots of twists and turns and a roller coster ride.

The writer has so well played with emotions, you keep guessing till the end.

Right from the beginning, the series gives an impression that something very interesting is going to happen, as it has all the components to make this a very interesting suspense thriller.

However, with every episode, the screenplay felt to be too dragged, the characters growing more and more monotonous and irritating. Most of the actors have given a decent performance. Neha Sharma could have been utilised more, as for majority of the time she has been nothing more than a showpiece.

As the makers need to end the series with a twist , so in the climax a forced crime is introduced, which has hardly any connection with the storyline.

The series, '36 Days,' offers a unique glimpse into the often hidden underbelly of high society. It's a brave attempt to showcase the dark side of wealth and privilege, revealing the political games, superficiality, and hidden desires that lurk beneath the glamorous facade.

While the storyline is intriguing and the concept is fresh, the series falls short in delivering a truly thrilling experience. The lack of a gripping crime or suspense element leaves the viewer somewhat unsatisfied. The pacing feels uneven, and the characters, though well-intentioned, lack the depth to fully engage the audience.

The acting, in some parts, feels a bit forced, making it difficult to fully immerse oneself in the story. The series could have benefited from more nuanced performances that would have added a layer of complexity to the characters.

Perhaps the biggest disappointment is the ending. A thriller series often culminates in a shocking or unexpected twist that leaves a lasting impression. Unfortunately, '36 Days' fails to deliver such a climax.

.