NOTE IMDb
7,0/10
760
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueThe Stones and Brian Jones examines the musical creativity of Jones, the secret to the band's success, through candid interviews with all the essential performers and previously unreleased a... Tout lireThe Stones and Brian Jones examines the musical creativity of Jones, the secret to the band's success, through candid interviews with all the essential performers and previously unreleased archive.The Stones and Brian Jones examines the musical creativity of Jones, the secret to the band's success, through candid interviews with all the essential performers and previously unreleased archive.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 victoire et 3 nominations au total
Brian Jones
- Self - Founder of the Rolling Stones
- (images d'archives)
The Rolling Stones
- Themselves
- (images d'archives)
Val Corbett
- Self - Girlfriend , Mother of Brian's First Child
- (images d'archives)
Muddy Waters
- Self - Blues Musician
- (images d'archives)
Howlin' Wolf
- Self - Blues Musician
- (images d'archives)
Andrew Loog Oldham
- Self - Manager
- (images d'archives)
Avis à la une
I grew up loving the British Invasion. The Beatles, Stones, The Kinks, and the Who were the soundtrack of my early teen life. When I saw The Stones and Brian Jones was playing at our local "Art" house movie theater, I had to see it. Brian was my favorite when the Stones first hit the big time. Loved his hair and his Vox Teardrop guitar which is featured prominently in the movie.
Quite simply, the writing and the content of the movie is excellent. It covered Brian's life from a child to his unfortunate death in 1969. It would have been nice if some of the remaining Stones would have been available to give the viewer their spin on Brian 50 years on, but that wasn't the case with only retired bass guitarist Bill Wyman talking on camera from a point of hindsight. And when he first appears, my wife and I had no idea who he was! He looked nothing like the Bill Wyman I remember, but we all age.
But the biggest issue with the doc is the producers and directors could not either afford to pay for the rights to any Stones songs written by members of the band or could not get the approval from the Stones to use their songs. For the exception of a few snippets of Satisfaction and another tune or two, only the early covers of Blues standards which was the Stones bread and butter in the early days are featured. I reminded me of the Hendrix movie that came out about 25 years ago that only had Hendrix songs written by others such as Dylan, and other Blues legends. It's about getting rights to the songs that would have made this movie pop.
Some scenes used what I would call, elevator music, as background which was cringeworthy at the least.
Most of the footage was new to me and that was the best part of the movie. The music, meh...
Quite simply, the writing and the content of the movie is excellent. It covered Brian's life from a child to his unfortunate death in 1969. It would have been nice if some of the remaining Stones would have been available to give the viewer their spin on Brian 50 years on, but that wasn't the case with only retired bass guitarist Bill Wyman talking on camera from a point of hindsight. And when he first appears, my wife and I had no idea who he was! He looked nothing like the Bill Wyman I remember, but we all age.
But the biggest issue with the doc is the producers and directors could not either afford to pay for the rights to any Stones songs written by members of the band or could not get the approval from the Stones to use their songs. For the exception of a few snippets of Satisfaction and another tune or two, only the early covers of Blues standards which was the Stones bread and butter in the early days are featured. I reminded me of the Hendrix movie that came out about 25 years ago that only had Hendrix songs written by others such as Dylan, and other Blues legends. It's about getting rights to the songs that would have made this movie pop.
Some scenes used what I would call, elevator music, as background which was cringeworthy at the least.
Most of the footage was new to me and that was the best part of the movie. The music, meh...
I was very interested in this documentary as I knew very little about Brian Jones, his background and his demise.
To be honest, by the end, I think I would rather have been left none the wiser.
Around about the 20 minute mark, Pat Andrews, the mother of one his many offspring, summed him up perfectly. This interview was recorded in 1965, so it was not a matter of hindsight, it was very much relevant and of the time.
Maybe it wasn't possible, but I would like to have seen more about his early childhood with a view to gaining more of an insight into how his character developed and became to utterly selfish and irresponsible.
I can empathise with his feeling of not wanting to be part the monoculture that was so prevalent in the 1950s and early 1960s, I am from that time myself. I feel there must have been more to his relationship with his parents than was presented as he seemed to be effortlessly accepted into oth-er families, only to abuse their hospitality by getting the daughters pregnant. Once is careless, twice is foolish ... five times!! What was he thinking?
His demise was mainly down to being completely lost psychologically and latterly being influenced by the wrong type of women.
The Rolling Stones was the band he put together, it was his band, but he soon found he couldn't write songs as was the new way of things at the time, and Mick Jagger was a more obvious spokesman for the group and he was soon sidelined by manager Andrew Loog Oldham.
You can see in the documentary that he was lost when the Stones were being interviewed.
On the plus side it was good to know how influential he was on the Stones early records.
To be honest, by the end, I think I would rather have been left none the wiser.
Around about the 20 minute mark, Pat Andrews, the mother of one his many offspring, summed him up perfectly. This interview was recorded in 1965, so it was not a matter of hindsight, it was very much relevant and of the time.
Maybe it wasn't possible, but I would like to have seen more about his early childhood with a view to gaining more of an insight into how his character developed and became to utterly selfish and irresponsible.
I can empathise with his feeling of not wanting to be part the monoculture that was so prevalent in the 1950s and early 1960s, I am from that time myself. I feel there must have been more to his relationship with his parents than was presented as he seemed to be effortlessly accepted into oth-er families, only to abuse their hospitality by getting the daughters pregnant. Once is careless, twice is foolish ... five times!! What was he thinking?
His demise was mainly down to being completely lost psychologically and latterly being influenced by the wrong type of women.
The Rolling Stones was the band he put together, it was his band, but he soon found he couldn't write songs as was the new way of things at the time, and Mick Jagger was a more obvious spokesman for the group and he was soon sidelined by manager Andrew Loog Oldham.
You can see in the documentary that he was lost when the Stones were being interviewed.
On the plus side it was good to know how influential he was on the Stones early records.
Brain Jones founded the Rolling Stones. He was shy, sexually attractive (and careless with it), and increasingly unhappy for not being Mick Jagger. Kicked out of the band for a level of drug abuse that made him unreliable, he died young a short while later. Nick Broomfield's film is a sympathetic account of his life that doesn't hide from the fact he wasn't always a nice person to be around, and a sad lesson of the perils of getting what you might have thought you wanted. The film relies quite a lot on Bill Wyman, but Wyman actually provides some perspective that those who stayed in the band for longer perhaps would not provide. It's an elegaic portrait of an ultimately tragic life.
I'm shocked this doc has a good-not-great rating. I thought it was borderline phenomenal. The amount of footage from the early '60s is amazing and the editing with said footage is incredibly good. It's a documentary that nails the two requirements for any doc: it's a great story combined with great technique.
I have been a Stones fan for about 25 years but never delved very far into their history. For someone like me this was eye-opening, and I have to believe a lot of the footage and even some audio was brand new to even the most die-hard fans.
To me this succeeds on every level. My only small beef was that sole of the audio interviews were hard to hear. Nothing crazy in the negative department. Almost nothing in fact. It's just a great doc that's nostalgic, fascinating and tragic.
I have been a Stones fan for about 25 years but never delved very far into their history. For someone like me this was eye-opening, and I have to believe a lot of the footage and even some audio was brand new to even the most die-hard fans.
To me this succeeds on every level. My only small beef was that sole of the audio interviews were hard to hear. Nothing crazy in the negative department. Almost nothing in fact. It's just a great doc that's nostalgic, fascinating and tragic.
From last year comes a documentary from master documentarian Nick Broomfield (Driving Me Crazy/Kurt & Courtney) about one time member of the Rolling Stones, Brian Jones, who ended up dying from drowning in his pool (after taking drugs) back in 1969. You think the sky was the limit for Jones as he was one of the founding members of the greatest, arguably, rock & roll band in the world (& history) but as we find out from archival footage & actor reenactments from his own missives, Jones soon found himself falling under the influence of his excessive drug taking & his predilection for feeling he was being constantly verbally attacked by fellow bandmates Mick Jagger & Keith Richards even though according to Bill Wyman some of the signature licks on key tracks came from him but it's sad to see how when the band was celebrating its best life, poor Jones found himself in a rabbit hole of his own making which he could not find himself out of.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Stones and Brian Jones?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- The Stones and Brian Jones
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 260 000 £GB (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 57 924 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 41 492 $US
- 19 nov. 2023
- Montant brut mondial
- 95 767 $US
- Durée1 heure 33 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Brian Jones et les Rolling Stones (2023) officially released in India in English?
Répondre