The Summer with Carmen

I got to forty minutes and switched the film off. As a concept, the film was a good idea. Unfortunately its execution was poor. Initially the idea of a script within a script fascinated me but it didn't take long to get tired of the continual switchings from the nudist beach where much of the devising of the script was going on to "real" life.

I had very little investment in the lives and ideas if the two main protagonists. Their friendship didn't seem real and neither did their characters. I certainly didn't find Demosthenes sexy either, something that others have a contrary view on.

This might appeal to a certain audience, particularly one that's involved deeply in the gay scene. It didn't rock my boat.

This Greek film subverts the love story by having gay partners working on the script of a film, extracts of which are cleverly interspersed with the action and sometimes amusingly contradicts it. I'd go so far as to say this is a real original. Even if I'm wrong, I believe I'm right in saying the film will lead to a major offer to director Zacharias Mavroeidis. He's made a few films before but nothing that's had potentially international appeal. This will be a particular joy for film fans, referencing Hollywood and British cinema. Pretentious or not, I knew from the first perfectly framed shot, on the rocks of the Athens coast, that Mavroeidis has talent. This was indeed the case. He draws excellent performances from his entire cast, notably charismatic star Yorgos Tsiantoulas. The film is also beautifully filmed around Athens and some of the footage on the coast is stunning. It includes a sequence in which the partners imagine turning their film into a musical, which is a delight. Zacharias and Yorgos were both at the British premiere at Flare last night, 15 March 2024, and told us great stuff about the Greek film industry (no agents, no intimacy co-ordinators), Carmen the dog, and Zacharias's hope that the film will be condemned by the Greek church. Yes, there's a lot of male nudity and that may be the main reason the screening was sold out. But the film is much more than exploitation: another critic has said that "existential philosophy has never been more playful than it is here" and he's dead right.

Demos looks like he walked straight out of an ancient Greek vase (definitely a big 'eye candy' element in selling the film), but inside he's an ordinary man like you and me. He's full of fibs and little hypocrisy, and loses his clarity as he often lets his cock think for his head. But he's not a bad guy. He just wants a piece of happiness for himself, that's all... like you and me.

Now, how can one turn such an ordinary summer of an ordinary guy into an entertaining film? Enters Nikitas, an aspiring director. But alas, he is not a genius who can magically turn this ordinary summer into a masterpiece either - he is full of his own little hang-ups and broken expectations too. The film uses their struggling of making a coherent script out of their life as the frame. It's an interesting self-mockery from the film maker's part.

But the end result is well put together and entertaining. There are lots of elements but it never lets itself get too serious. There are plenty of humour, handsome guys and sexy scenes to keep you entertained. Some moments came across as trying to be too clever (like the little moment of mock-musical), but overall it stays within its frame of the ordinary people trying to turn their ordinary story into a film. But as an ordinary guy full of little BS myself, there definitely was something to take from it.

Certainly worth a look.

When I started watching this movie, I thought, "An ordinary audience will probably think the film includes too much nudity." When I read the reviews, I realized I was right. However, this film doesn't actually contain excessive nudity. Instead, it portrays an aspect of gay culture. One of the most misguided judgments originating from a heterosexual mindset has always been the attempt to equate gay culture with heterosexual culture.

Yes, gays demand to be treated equally in society regarding rights and freedoms, and they are absolutely justified in this demand. The modern world has started to pave the way for equality, although there is still a long road ahead to achieve complete equality and freedom. However, we must understand that gay culture cannot be reduced to just a relationship between two people of the same sex. It is a broader concept that includes unique elements.

In gay culture, the way social life is lived may share similarities with heterosexuality, but the lifestyle demonstrates notable differences. For example, open relationships, orgies, and group dynamics are more widely accepted within gay culture than in heterosexual culture. Sexuality, rather than just sex, is a defining feature of gay culture and plays a crucial role in shaping identity.

Returning to the movie: yes, it features nudity, but this serves as a colorful element that adds cheerfulness and reminds viewers that the film stems from gay culture.

As for the movie itself, I liked it very much. Above all, experiencing Greece during the summertime made me feel wonderful. The actors-Yorgos Tsiantoulas (Demosthenes), Andreas Labropoulos (Nikitas), Nikolaos Mihas (Panos), Roubini Vasilakopoulou (Keti), Vasilis Tsigristaris (Thymios), and others-deliver outstanding performances. Their acting convinces us that they are as real as we are. The dialogues between the characters are relatable and innocent.

While the movie avoids diving deeply into melancholy, it provides a strong depiction of the characters' past experiences. The film's greatest success lies in its technique. The script and direction employ an innovative storytelling method. Flashbacks, typewritten notes, and structuring the film as a discussion of a movie scenario are completely fresh elements. For this, the director, Zacharias Mavroeidis (also the scriptwriter), and Fondas Chalatsis, the co-scriptwriter, deserve congratulations.

If you are a heterosexual viewer and find gay nudity disturbing, consider how many heterosexual nude scenes a gay audience sees in mainstream movies. Gay individuals endure many such scenes-not only in movies but also in commercials, magazines, TV shows, billboards, and daily life. Try to view it from their perspective.

This is an incredibly well-constructed movie, brimming with irony and following the tragic yet thought-provoking patterns reminiscent of ancient philosophers like Plato. The narrative subtly explores the complexities of human emotions, where the love between the main characters remains purely platonic, highlighting themes of connection beyond the physical.

A special mention goes to the dog, who delivered a surprisingly nuanced performance. Her presence is not just charming but integral to the plot, adding emotional depth and symbolizing loyalty and companionship in ways that enhance the storytelling.

The film's unique sense of humor stands out, masterfully blending subtle wit with a post-ironic visual narrative that keeps the audience engaged. This clever approach elevates the movie, offering layers of meaning that invite reflection long after the credits roll.

I give it an extra 100 out of 100 for its brilliance-both in its humor and innovative narrative structure. It's been over 100 minutes of pure cinematic delight, leaving me entertained and impressed in equal measure.