NOTE IMDb
5,5/10
17 k
MA NOTE
Un millionnaire voit sa vie bouleversée après avoir licencié son consultant en informatique.Un millionnaire voit sa vie bouleversée après avoir licencié son consultant en informatique.Un millionnaire voit sa vie bouleversée après avoir licencié son consultant en informatique.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Brian F. Mulvey
- George
- (as Brian Mulvey)
Olivia Phoenix
- Heather
- (as Olivia Romao)
Avis à la une
IT is very much a "by the numbers" thriller.
There's nothing on offer here the viewer has, in one form or other, not seen before. Take an executive, add in a deranged IT guy and, of course, a loving family to protect and that's, pretty much it.
The acting is fine and, to be fair, Pierce Brosnan, in particular, hands in a very good performance. The action scenes are polished too. Indeed, in many respects, this film ticks most of boxes you would expect. Alas, this is not enough to save this now rather predictable affair from the label or "ordinary".
Watch by all means, just don't expect to be thrilled or even a little surprised. Six out of ten from me.
There's nothing on offer here the viewer has, in one form or other, not seen before. Take an executive, add in a deranged IT guy and, of course, a loving family to protect and that's, pretty much it.
The acting is fine and, to be fair, Pierce Brosnan, in particular, hands in a very good performance. The action scenes are polished too. Indeed, in many respects, this film ticks most of boxes you would expect. Alas, this is not enough to save this now rather predictable affair from the label or "ordinary".
Watch by all means, just don't expect to be thrilled or even a little surprised. Six out of ten from me.
I never came to the theater with great expectations of this one. It just follows an already known path and delivers nothing special to be remembered for. The acting is on a similar level, maybe the antagonist stood out a bit more than the others, but not by a huge margin.
The plot was linear and did not offer very much to begin with. It had some illogical things happening too. Felt rushed to me. The ending was unsatisfying and did not provide much to complete the movie.
Something was missing between the first act of the movie and the second act - the transition was not smooth. The story of the antagonist was given out so lamely that it made exhale more air than usual... It could've been done better. Everything could have been done better, might've ended with an okay movie to spend some time on.
Unsettling movie. 6/10 (I mainly rate movies from 5 to 10 so this is really low for me)
The plot was linear and did not offer very much to begin with. It had some illogical things happening too. Felt rushed to me. The ending was unsatisfying and did not provide much to complete the movie.
Something was missing between the first act of the movie and the second act - the transition was not smooth. The story of the antagonist was given out so lamely that it made exhale more air than usual... It could've been done better. Everything could have been done better, might've ended with an okay movie to spend some time on.
Unsettling movie. 6/10 (I mainly rate movies from 5 to 10 so this is really low for me)
Well this one is a leaf in the forest, if you've seen one, you've seen them all. Sure there are a few things that set this movie aside from the many others that are pretty much just like it, but not enough to care. It's worth checking out if it's on late night cable and you haven't seen it yet. But I wouldn't go out of my way to watch this. Overall it's not bad, it's filmed decently enough, the acting isn't junk, there is some story here, but it's all cut from the same predictable cloth as with many movies like it. So like I said check it out if nothing else is on and you can't sleep, won't be the worst movie you've ever seen, but won't make it into your top 20 either, well maybe if you like the same old. It gets a 4.5 out of 10.
Could have been a good movie. But a movie with a crime plot, cyber and law subplots shouldn't get all the details wrong. Errors included citing the wrong constitutional amendments and using the wrong law enforcement agencies. Although the acting was pretty good, the characters actions were counter-intuitive, thus creating distance between the characters and the audience. As a result, the movie quickly grew implausible and therefore tedious. They needed better technical consultants and tighter writing. Perhaps a little research before finalizing the script would have uncovered the errors. We deserve better.
If you're a fan of thrillers and are looking about for something to watch, this is a good shout. Entertaining film, well acted, but nothing to write home about. One of those films you'll enjoy but forget soon thereafter.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesPierce gave his voice to a "smart house" in a Simpsons episode, with similar setting, only now the tables are turned.
- GaffesAfter Ed remotely crashes Mike's car, his video screens go dead and show an analog static pattern. The cameras in Ed's car would clearly have to be digital so his screen should have just gone black.
- Citations
Mike Regan: Should we be doing this?
Ed Porter: No
- Crédits fousThe opening credits are made to resemble HTML (HyperText Markup Language). HTML is the standard markup language for documents designed to be displayed in a web browser, and as such, hint at the basic weapon to be used in the film.
- ConnexionsReferenced in Diminishing Returns: It (2017) (2019)
- Bandes originalesGirls Cry Boys Lie
Performed by Deveraux
© 2016, all rights reserved
(p) 2016 Lakeshore Records
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is I.T.?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 11 250 379 € (estimé)
- Montant brut mondial
- 2 128 301 $US
- Durée
- 1h 35min(95 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant