O.J. Simpson: Blood, Lies & Murder

This documentary leaves me somewhat puzzled about its intended purpose. It seems that the general consensus nowadays is that OJ was not innocent. Yet, the film presents a plethora of blood-related evidence that was not brought forward during the trial. Detective Lange refrains from criticizing anyone, instead focusing on presenting the actual evidence. The blood expert clarifies that this specific type of blood could not have been "planted" due to its spatter and cast-off nature. It's not as simple as dropping blood on a sock or inside a car. If the case didn't involve a celebrity and wasn't set against the backdrop of a riot-torn L. A., it would have been a straightforward case.

One of the key aspects of this documentary is the display of graphic crime scene photos that reveal the intense fury behind these murders. This was not a random act of violence, but a crime fueled by deep-seated personal rage. Viewing these photos makes it challenging to perceive OJ as anything other than a monster. However, he has since passed away, so the objective of this documentary remains unclear, unless it's to provide a platform for a detective still smarting from being labeled a liar and ridiculed despite knowing he had apprehended the correct suspect.

While I can't claim to have enjoyed this documentary - who could, really? - I did gain some new insights, and discovered that Kato Kaelin continues to be quite captivating.

I'm not sure why such bad reviews. This documentary is extremely graphic but it does an EXCELLENT job of showing and explaining the blood evidence. I will never understand why the man who analyzed the blood spatter and recreated the attack was not a witness in the trial. He explains EVERYTHING...not based on opinions but rather actual scientific analysis of the blood drops, spatter, smudges, etc. He also explains clearly that the evidence could not have been planted by the police. He also does a recreation demonstrating just how fast it all took place and how Oj would not have been covered in blood as people suspect. It should have been shown to the jury. Any which way you see it, there is no doubt that this trial was a serious miscarriage of justice. Very very heartbreaking.

If OJ was innocent then who murdered Nicole and Ron on that fateful night?

Why is there never been any other suspect. Even a possible subject after all these years.

It not OJ then who committed these crimes? Who else would have a motive?

How could you post something so despicable and disrespectful to those families.

OJ getting let off the hook will always be a stain on our justice system and the lengths the defense can and will go to get their clients off on crimes!!

Lastly, how did this help the regular person in the streets? What justice has been served except letting a rich entitled murdered off the hook?

You all saying OJ was innocent should be ashamed of yourselves!! Johnny and OJ eventually got what was coming to them, but when will you!!

There was just 1/8th of one drop of blood found in the Bronco. It was proven at the trial how the blood on the socks and the blood on the back gate were planted, and both also had EDTA in them. Everyone who interacted with OJ at the airport and on the flight to Chicago including those who shook hands with him, observed his hands, and got autographs from him testified to seeing no cuts or bandages on his hands. A broken glass and towel with blood on it were found in his hotel room in Chicago. Douglas Deedrick said under oath that there was no hair consistent with Nicole's found in the Bronco when he was questioned by F. Lee Bailey. There was no blood found in OJ's plumbing, washing machine, or drain traps. The stains supposedly found in his shower were so small that Dennis Fung was never able to confirm it was human blood. If someone left that crime scene they would've been covered in blood. Ron Goldman fought ferociously for his life and had defensive wounds on his hands and shoes indicating he landed blows on his killer, yet OJ had no bruises on his body. Watch Court TV's OJ25 docuseries instead of this biased, one sided documentary.

I was hoping this would be somewhat as good as OJ, made in America, which is a clear masterpiece. Of course that hope was well in vain or disappointed.

I'm not sure what psychoactive drugs the people who made this were on, but it was delusional to think it was a good idea to show this much death and gore. At first I was like, that's pretty interesting they're showing this because all the other documentaries on it, they show the death photos for a few seconds or not at all. But these people went to the line, crossed the line and then sailed to Antarctica past the line.

I'm not about to watch this garbage again to verify(I only made it to 49 minutes of it before I had to bail), but from what I recall, they showed death photos like 30 times in 20 minutes. Even more bizarre, they showed Nicole's dead feet 9 times in 20 minutes!! What was that about?

On top of all that it was boring. I understand that is the nature of the beast when you are going into the weeds on the evidence, but still.