Une série de braquages de banques et de vols de voitures a effrayé les communautés du nord-ouest du Pacifique. Un agent isolé du FBI pense que ces crimes ne sont pas l'œuvre de criminels mot... Tout lireUne série de braquages de banques et de vols de voitures a effrayé les communautés du nord-ouest du Pacifique. Un agent isolé du FBI pense que ces crimes ne sont pas l'œuvre de criminels motivés par la finance.Une série de braquages de banques et de vols de voitures a effrayé les communautés du nord-ouest du Pacifique. Un agent isolé du FBI pense que ces crimes ne sont pas l'œuvre de criminels motivés par la finance.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires et 7 nominations au total
- Bank Manager
- (as Bryan McHale)
Résumé
Avis à la une
The positives: The casting is great and the idaho landscape makes for beautiful shots. I really liked the exciting bank robbing parts as well as well as a being a grizzled detective drama. Bob Matthews is a interesting but vile character who has a weird personality of being a "family-man" and friendly but also blowing up p*rn theatres and killing innocents. I thought he was the best character in the movie, however the rest of the character's are pretty much one-note. I will get to that in the negatives, I also liked the score as well with it being very melodic but brooding at times (not your average detective drama score). The plot overall is fascinating and can be thrilling at times with well done robberies, chases, and some emotional moments.
Negatives: Like I said the characters besides Bob Matthews are pretty one note. I liked Jude law as a detective but he really dosen't do much except be the veteran grizzled detective with a young naive partner. The movie dosen't have the story structure to really make you care all that much about anyone. Sometimes scenes would bounce from one to another just to get to the next thrilling moments (which were solid). Also some dumb moments like a multiple moments where characters risk their lives in obvious situations where the cards are stacked against them and they don't need too.
All in all I would recommend if you wanna watch a pretty alright detective drama with some beautiful shots. I do not dislike the movie but its more of a vehicle for this great cast to handle a interesting story rather than interesting characters.
Saw in AMC theater 12-14-2024.
Jude Law is really good in his role as this weary and seasoned FBI agent. I like the supporting cast members. I think Nicholas Hault actually looks a lot like Bob Matthews (based on his picture, which I saw on Wiki), and the young sheriff who works with Jude Law is good too. The movie's scenery is gorgeous, with the forests, mountains, and lake. I like the score too. There is an overall dark and gritty vibe throughout the film
The movie doesn't reach greatness because of the plot and predictability. I know that the events are based on a true story, so I get that the plot was limited since they had to follow the events that really occurred (note: I had never heard of Bob Matthews or the Turner diaries until I watched this movie). But they telegraphed some events, such as one character's death, way too obviously. I also feel that the film could've given more about the villain's motivations other than "they're evil racist white men." The movie early on shows a divide between Bob Matthews group and another white supremacist group: the latter believes that the right way to push white supremacy is through legal means, such as getting white supremacists elected to office. I feel this plot thread could have been explored more. The police scenes include some cliches too
Lastly - there was no need to insert politics at the very end, with a reference to January 6th, 2021.
What Nitram did though, and this film never managed, was it made me look at things from a different perspective. The concept that the person behind a mass shooting is, exactly that, a person, is just nothing I had given consideration to before. Easier to label a monster (which they are, but there are reasons behind this) and move on than to think about it.
I guess therefore I was expecting to try and understand something here. Like it was going to say something. But in the end it felt very procedural. Some white guys are racist because they are and some other guy hunts them down because he does. Honestly, that's about it.
I never felt for a second like I understood anything about Nicholas Holts character or why he was a complete (insert word rhyming with duck) head. I guess there is an argument that you don't want to give oxygen but I feel this film maker has had a lot more to say in the past and if you aren't going to say anything then probably don't say anything at all.
Anyway, not offensive but just very very average.
Despite all these important aspects, the movie didn't really pull me in. The pacing was slowish, not in a way that builds suspense or depth, but rather in a way that made it hard to stay emotionally invested. Scenes lingered without always adding much, and I often found myself waiting for something to fully click.
I think the main issue is that the film lacked some much-needed background, particularly when it came to crucial character development and the broader historical context. While I understood the general facts and timeline, I never really felt connected to the people involved or what was truly at stake, both for them as individuals and for the country as a whole. It felt like there was an emotional distance that the film never bridged.
In the end, it's a film I admire for its craft, but not one that truly moved me. They really were spot on in some crucial areas, the acting, the visuals, the tone, which only made it more disappointing when the film didn't quite come together as a whole. It had so much potential to be powerful and immersive, but instead, it left me feeling a bit cold and unfulfilled.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesNicholas Hoult told reporters how he and Jude Law, adversaries in the film, did not speak or interact with each other for the first four weeks of filming in an attempt to distance themselves from each other.
- GaffesAgent Husk enters Torres' cell while wearing his firearm. No law enforcement or corrections official would enter an inmate's cell with a firearm. Husk, Carney, and Bowen would have had to secure their weapons before entering the area where prisoners were held. In the film, they're wearing their weapons.
- Citations
Alan Berg: You know what my problem is with every fanatic fundamentalist, from the Catholics, to the Orthodox, to the KKK? The one thing you all have in common is, and you're too ignorant to see it, is that you're too inept to get by in the world, so your only recourse is to try and curtail the enjoyment of others.
- ConnexionsReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 974: Nosferatu (2025)
- Bandes originalesKOA Radio Jingle
JAM Creative Productions, Inc.
Courtesy of Jonathan Wolfert
Used under license
Meilleurs choix
- How long is The Order?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Порядок
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 2 010 901 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 877 855 $US
- 8 déc. 2024
- Montant brut mondial
- 2 270 354 $US
- Durée1 heure 56 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1