NOTE IMDb
5,5/10
25 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueThe friends facing disastrously funny situations together and having each other's backs through the trenches to make it out of a new mess this time.The friends facing disastrously funny situations together and having each other's backs through the trenches to make it out of a new mess this time.The friends facing disastrously funny situations together and having each other's backs through the trenches to make it out of a new mess this time.
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires et 3 nominations au total
Richa Amberr
- Reporter
- (as Richa Ambar)
Résumé
Reviewers say 'Fukrey 3' garners mixed opinions, with many praising its humor, cast chemistry, and continuation of beloved antics. Fans appreciate the comedic timing and light-hearted nature. However, critics argue the film lacks a coherent plot, with absurd scenarios straining credibility. Complaints about the weak script and diminishing quality compared to earlier installments arise. Some viewers find the humor forced and the movie disappointing, suggesting the franchise should have ended earlier.
Avis à la une
Pankaj tripathy was the only good thing about the movie. The jokes are poorly written and the script is weak which just seems pointless after a while. Its a sheer waste of time and the. Don't think imdb is reliable anymore, with such high ratings for such a film. It's a classic franchise killer. They should've stuck with the original writers from the first two parts which it seems they did not. Feels like I would need to rewatch the first two parts again now, just to protect the memory of the first two parts in my mind. Rest if you have a couple of hundred bucks, or more, to kill and want to increase your appreciation for the classic priyadarshan films, do go and watch it :)
Utter garbage it is. Not anywhere close the first two parts. It's very disgusting at most part of movie as it's all around susu, potty, G dhona, toilet water and what not (Literally). This one has no story, and goes here and there haywire. Too loud in some parts.
F3 won't match the expectations you would have. There is no glamour the first two had. There are some extremely boring and stretched parts, which shouldn't be there. Don't know about the writers but doesn't seem to be one who wrote first parts. Actors did all they could but the storyline was bad.
Assumptions that people will laugh and enjoy at anything movie makers would throw is not correct.
Avoid it !
F3 won't match the expectations you would have. There is no glamour the first two had. There are some extremely boring and stretched parts, which shouldn't be there. Don't know about the writers but doesn't seem to be one who wrote first parts. Actors did all they could but the storyline was bad.
Assumptions that people will laugh and enjoy at anything movie makers would throw is not correct.
Avoid it !
Can't make you laugh. You wait till the end of movie and it doesn't come. Conclusion:
"Drenched in Regret" is a perfect example of how not to make a film. Its lackluster storyline, poor acting, and failed attempts at humor leave audiences feeling like they've been caught in a never-ending rainstorm of disappointment. Perhaps it's best to leave this movie shipwrecked and seek out something that won't make you regret spending your time and money on it.am left with no choice but to give it a dismal 1-star rating. The poor story, abysmal acting, and unfunny jokes all contribute to this sinking ship of a movie.
The movie will seem a bit haphazardly compiled from 2nd quarter. Flashback scenes take a lot of screentime. Whereas main story don't get enough time to have a proper buildup.
What seemed to me is, unlike many other poor performing sequel movies, Fukrey 3 did not lack a good story. Instead it lacked dialogue, direction and finally editing.
Actors acted perfectly according to direction. But an opportunity wasted by the director, since it's directors job to make and implement the whole masterpiece plan.
Pros: Funny scenes to make you giggle still exists because of Varun, Pulkit, Manjot and Pankaj ji and they are some genuine fun parts of the movie. So, to me this movie is not a 1 or 2. It gets a solid 3 out of 5.
What seemed to me is, unlike many other poor performing sequel movies, Fukrey 3 did not lack a good story. Instead it lacked dialogue, direction and finally editing.
Actors acted perfectly according to direction. But an opportunity wasted by the director, since it's directors job to make and implement the whole masterpiece plan.
Pros: Funny scenes to make you giggle still exists because of Varun, Pulkit, Manjot and Pankaj ji and they are some genuine fun parts of the movie. So, to me this movie is not a 1 or 2. It gets a solid 3 out of 5.
Don't know what director producer are trying to achieving by spoiling the legacy of great 1st instalment of Fukrey. Fukrey returns was bad and here Fukrey 3 is worse. No good punch lines, no laughable jokes. It's a forced movie. Pulkit Samrat looks too tired and disinterested in movie. Pankaj Tripathi and Varun Sharma did their best but the script is so weak that they too can't save the film. It's completely illogical movie.
This is clearly to be avoided as its waste of time. Instead of watching Fukrey3 I recommend watch Fukrey again to make your time worthy and have good laugh again.
And I hope there is no further instalment.
This is clearly to be avoided as its waste of time. Instead of watching Fukrey3 I recommend watch Fukrey again to make your time worthy and have good laugh again.
And I hope there is no further instalment.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesRicha Chaddha's character Bholi Punjaban's name is revealed to be Phoolkumari Sehgal.
- Bandes originalesVe Fukrey
Shabbir Ahmed
Dev Negi, Romy & Asees Kaur
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Fukrey 3?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 50 ₹ (estimé)
- Montant brut mondial
- 583 921 $US
- Durée
- 2h 27min(147 min)
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant