Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueAfter visiting a supposedly haunted forest, a teen girl comes to believe that a violent poltergeist followed her home and is stalking her.After visiting a supposedly haunted forest, a teen girl comes to believe that a violent poltergeist followed her home and is stalking her.After visiting a supposedly haunted forest, a teen girl comes to believe that a violent poltergeist followed her home and is stalking her.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 victoire et 1 nomination au total
Rin Walker
- Mary Harding
- (as Camerin Paige Walker)
Avis à la une
I want to like Liberty Lane Productions. I respect the effort to make films with a low budget. But holy crap, guys. The amateur actors especially made this feel like a student production. It's a shame, because the story was actually somewhat interesting. Not exactly unique, but with better execution, it could have made a decent film.
The last minute is worth one out of the three stars I gave this movie.
The last minute is worth one out of the three stars I gave this movie.
As I find myself unable to figure out where or how to begin, I'll start off by saying that this just might be the first time a Horror film receives a fair rating on IMDB (as usually, for some reason, people who dislike Horror think giving it bad reviews says something positive or flattering about them). This film is downright terrible, with perhaps four scenes that are not boring, badly written/acted/directed and worthy of screen time.
Of course, most people have only come across this atrocity due to Netflix, where it's called "American Poltergeist 2" (despite having been released two years prior to the less than overwhelming American Poltergeist, so I have no idea how this even works). And of course, there's no ignoring the fact that it doesn't take more than a two minute "research" to realize that whatever "entity" the antagonist is - it's not a poltergeist.
The camera trembles too much. The acting is childish. The "twist" is so forced it's sad. But the first prize by far goes to the audio quality in like half the film. No, there is nothing wrong with your sound card, speakers, television set or whatever. The director has actually had the audacity to release this film in its current quality level (or lack thereof). I don't even think the overall product would have passed a freshman year cinema course, so even implying this is a film that belongs on a paid streaming service is an affront to basic intelligence. Whoever was responsible for putting this on Netflix should know that he single handedly cost them at least half a star of reputation.
Of course, most people have only come across this atrocity due to Netflix, where it's called "American Poltergeist 2" (despite having been released two years prior to the less than overwhelming American Poltergeist, so I have no idea how this even works). And of course, there's no ignoring the fact that it doesn't take more than a two minute "research" to realize that whatever "entity" the antagonist is - it's not a poltergeist.
The camera trembles too much. The acting is childish. The "twist" is so forced it's sad. But the first prize by far goes to the audio quality in like half the film. No, there is nothing wrong with your sound card, speakers, television set or whatever. The director has actually had the audacity to release this film in its current quality level (or lack thereof). I don't even think the overall product would have passed a freshman year cinema course, so even implying this is a film that belongs on a paid streaming service is an affront to basic intelligence. Whoever was responsible for putting this on Netflix should know that he single handedly cost them at least half a star of reputation.
Naturally I had never heard about this 2013 horror movie titled "You Will Love Me" (aka "The Poltergeist of Borley Forest"). Yeah, I stumbled upon a copy of the movie with the title "The Poltergeist of Borley Forest" and even the movie's title intro displayed that title. So this whole "You Will Love Me" title is just beyond me.
And given my love and fascination of the horror genre, of course I needed no persuasion to sit down and check out what director Stephen McKendree had to offer.
The movie's storyline was not particularly riveting, and my interest in the narrative was sort of ebbing out and flowing away as the movie continued on in a rather slow and monotonous pace. And while I did manage to sit through the entire 102 minutes that the movie ran for, I have to say that I was not impressed with the contents that writers R. Presley Stephens and Kimberly Britt delivered.
I was not familiar with a single actor or actress on the cast list. The acting performances in the movie were fair, but nothing outstanding or memorable, mind you.
Visually, then you're not in for anything grand here. This was a movie that didn't really utilize special effects in any particular noticeable or mentionable way. So not even that was working in favor of the movie, since it was lacking in the story department.
If you enjoy horror movies, do yourself a favor and don't waste your time, money or effort on this movie. Some of us suffered through it, so you don't have to; you're quite welcome.
My rating of director Stephen McKendree's 2013 movie lands on a very generous two out of ten stars.
And given my love and fascination of the horror genre, of course I needed no persuasion to sit down and check out what director Stephen McKendree had to offer.
The movie's storyline was not particularly riveting, and my interest in the narrative was sort of ebbing out and flowing away as the movie continued on in a rather slow and monotonous pace. And while I did manage to sit through the entire 102 minutes that the movie ran for, I have to say that I was not impressed with the contents that writers R. Presley Stephens and Kimberly Britt delivered.
I was not familiar with a single actor or actress on the cast list. The acting performances in the movie were fair, but nothing outstanding or memorable, mind you.
Visually, then you're not in for anything grand here. This was a movie that didn't really utilize special effects in any particular noticeable or mentionable way. So not even that was working in favor of the movie, since it was lacking in the story department.
If you enjoy horror movies, do yourself a favor and don't waste your time, money or effort on this movie. Some of us suffered through it, so you don't have to; you're quite welcome.
My rating of director Stephen McKendree's 2013 movie lands on a very generous two out of ten stars.
A cast of character that one could not identify with nor care about. I think there is a plot here that could make fifteen minute short perhaps. Let us elongate that pain into almost two unbearable hours and one attempting to view said film could find themselves at their stove attempting to boil their own head.
This constant preoccupation with one frame? Digital video runs 25 frames per second so a 1 frame anomaly would not be noticed. Plus cleaning up 1 frame that has an artifact for complete clarity would be impossible. I am a digital editor as a living.
It is amazing that everyone these days can be in movies and NOT everyone is an actor. Just do not watch it unless you need a catalyst to put you to sleep.
This constant preoccupation with one frame? Digital video runs 25 frames per second so a 1 frame anomaly would not be noticed. Plus cleaning up 1 frame that has an artifact for complete clarity would be impossible. I am a digital editor as a living.
It is amazing that everyone these days can be in movies and NOT everyone is an actor. Just do not watch it unless you need a catalyst to put you to sleep.
Some review here said it was. No it's not.
I was looking for a silly B-movie horror flick to pass the time before dinner. I brought out Netflix and and 15 mins fast forwarded a bit. For the first 15 mins nothing of note happened. Apart from clichés, bad acting, bad filming and more bad acting. And clichés. Unfortunately nothing more seems to be happening apart from the above and bad plot logic (like 4 guys sitting in a room when things go *BUMP* somewhere in a supposedly empty house without anyone actually reacting to this).
I've given it a "2" out of kindness and because there are worse wastes of time out there. Possibly not many, but they do exist. Avoid!
I was looking for a silly B-movie horror flick to pass the time before dinner. I brought out Netflix and and 15 mins fast forwarded a bit. For the first 15 mins nothing of note happened. Apart from clichés, bad acting, bad filming and more bad acting. And clichés. Unfortunately nothing more seems to be happening apart from the above and bad plot logic (like 4 guys sitting in a room when things go *BUMP* somewhere in a supposedly empty house without anyone actually reacting to this).
I've given it a "2" out of kindness and because there are worse wastes of time out there. Possibly not many, but they do exist. Avoid!
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesIn Germany, it was released as sequel to the 2015 horror film American Poltergeist (2015), even though it was actually shot two years earlier in 2013 and has nothing to do with the aforementioned film.
- GaffesToutes les informations contiennent des spoilers
- ConnexionsReferences Junior le terrible (1990)
- Bandes originalesThe Fall of Persephone
Written & Performed by Bird Machinery
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée
- 1h 42min(102 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant