[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Disaster Wars: Earthquake vs. Tsunami

  • 2013
  • Not Rated
  • 1h 25min
NOTE IMDb
1,9/10
612
MA NOTE
Disaster Wars: Earthquake vs. Tsunami (2013)
ActionDrameScience-fictionThriller

Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueWhich ever one wins. We lose.Which ever one wins. We lose.Which ever one wins. We lose.

  • Réalisation
    • David Palmieri
  • Scénario
    • Seán Lee
    • Keith Parker
  • Casting principal
    • Joe Estevez
    • Priscilla Barnes
    • Reggie Bannister
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    1,9/10
    612
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • David Palmieri
    • Scénario
      • Seán Lee
      • Keith Parker
    • Casting principal
      • Joe Estevez
      • Priscilla Barnes
      • Reggie Bannister
    • 38avis d'utilisateurs
    • 3avis des critiques
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • Photos

    Rôles principaux27

    Modifier
    Joe Estevez
    Joe Estevez
    • Colonel Brayman
    Priscilla Barnes
    Priscilla Barnes
    • Vice President Taylor
    Reggie Bannister
    Reggie Bannister
    • Dr. Jeff Taylor
    Pete Punito
    • Dr. Vickers
    Joseph Michael Harris
    Joseph Michael Harris
    • Gunnery Sgt. Benjamin Wright
    • (as Michael Harris)
    Kelly Erin Decker
    Kelly Erin Decker
    • Toni Sims
    Laura Azevedo
    Laura Azevedo
    • Victoria Wright
    Kylia Azevedo-Jones
    Kylia Azevedo-Jones
    • Talia Wright
    John H. Mayer
    John H. Mayer
    • Dr. Stoker
    Kraig Dane
    Kraig Dane
    • Daniel Ashe
    Marlene Mc'Cohen
    • Allison Jenkins
    Erica LaRose
    Erica LaRose
    • Karen Taylor
    Cindy Rucker Trost
    • Tonya Michaels
    Max Kleinman
    • Dr. Stan Greene
    Brandy LaPlante
    • Michelle Barons
    • (as Brandy Laplante)
    Shawn C. Phillips
    Shawn C. Phillips
    • Luke Aldin
    Bivas Biswas
    Bivas Biswas
    • Simon Narino
    Jenny Allford
    Jenny Allford
    • Angela
    • Réalisation
      • David Palmieri
    • Scénario
      • Seán Lee
      • Keith Parker
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs38

    1,9612
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    1rushknight

    This is the first time I've ever said this. I could make a better movie.

    I have a sickness. I find appalling movies gratifying. I've become so fond of them that I'm literally filled with glee when I see one. The worse it is, the more joy I appear to gain from it.

    Thus, I am a living, breathing meter of terrible. And I can tell you that my meter is off the charts on this one. I'm practically reeling in elation, and trust me, this is bad for you sane people.

    (The following text will be a series of hyperboles designed to push forth the general impression that the movie was bad. If you feel the need to stop reading now, I forgive you. Go in peace.)

    This is the first time I've ever looked at a film and said to myself, "You know what.. I think I could do better. By myself even." The special effects are downright horrifying. Horrifyingly bad that is. I have seen a friend of mine work with freeware software for a class project, and even he did better than what I just saw. These special effects are on the same level as "Birdemic" and "MegaPiranha." They are that bad (I recommend both movies, by the way.. Though you may hate me for it).

    How about the acting? Believe me, watching a dog bark at itself in a mirror will give you more empathy than anything you'll get from the acting in this one. How any director could look at this and say, "Yes, this works. It's really creating the mood," is a mystery to me. I don't think any other actors could possibly make an impending catastrophe appear to be less worthy of heartfelt emotion. The dialogue was so incredibly dry, and deeply inept.

    The best acting in the whole movie had to be the bums. They were great.

    What about the plot? Plot holes don't just exist, they hit you in the face with a shovel. The level of stupid is so high that it might actually seep out of your screen and get on you. I'm not going to bother giving examples, that would be cheating. But trust me, common sense doesn't exist in this one.

    I realize that budgetary concerns are commonly used as an excuse, but realistically there is no excuse. Amazing movies have been created on very tight budgets. If your special effects are bad, tighten your acting. If the acting is poor, smooth out the plot. There are ways to concentrate on the winning points of your feature. Even with everything else being terrible, your movie can still be entertaining and fun! This director failed to pick a winning point, but instead attempted to do everything at once, and the film had almost no noteworthy moments. Sadly, there was simply just no entertainment.

    The acting producer should be able to tell right away that something is wrong, and make appropriate course corrections for the production. For instance, the special effects: "Let's see, earthquakes, falling debris, tsunamis, satellites, lasers, nuclear explosions, submarines, bullet wounds and military technology ambiance. And I have a budget of.. Ah hell no. Something's got to go." This would have been a better answer than, "Awwright! We have a computer! Let's do it!"

    Lastly, I confess that it brings me joy to inflict this sort of insipid cinema on people. Please watch it. For me? xxoxxo, bye bye now.
    1nishat-74594

    There are abysmal movies....and then there is this.

    I love a good disaster movie but this has to be the absolute worst movie I have ever seen. The first 5 minutes of the movie clues you in that it's going to be hard to keep watching. The acting is....a travesty. The acting was either emotionally flat or so overdone that's it's cringe-worthy. Do not waste your time. You'll never get it back. Jesus.
    1jaholl

    Saving The World In Your Bathrobe...

    I remember saying over and over again..."Are you kidding me"? I had to check the spoiler box, because to describe some of the ridiculous scenes that passed for a movie these days was absolutely necessary in hopes to save the rest of mankind from wasting one second of their precious time to think they might want to watch this.

    You've got a supposed geological expert dragged out of his house in the early morning and forced to "help" the Vice President save the world, yet he has to do it all while wearing his bathrobe. Lol They wouldn't even let him change into clothes. Hilarious.

    Then, two idiots on a sailboat are filming a live segment for a news channel. Really? HOW did they do that? They had a regular cam sitting on a tripod. You know, the ones you'd use for home movies and yet they were going "live" on the air. Really? How was this gal knowing when they were going live? She had no headset on. The entire time they were supposedly on the air, the camera bobbed up and down because the boat was riding the waves. I swear, this had to be one of the dumbest things I've ever seen on film.

    LOVE the two kids holding down the fort in Hawaii where their job is watching for earthquakes and warning the public to evacuate. Seriously? I thought highly trained meteorologists did that kind of work. Not two goofy kids. They looked like teens.

    Every single person involved with this film (and I use the term loosely) could not act. Not one bit. Even Priscilla Barnes was horrendous. She also looks really bad. There were so many pauses before the next person would say their dumb lines. Only a very bad director allows this to happen.

    I've seen really bad movies, but this should never have made it to even television. My high school cinema class handed in better movies.
    1otter-stl

    What budget?

    Now in my top 20 worse movies ever made. The only person I recognized was the lady who played the Vice-President. She played the President in "24". Hard to believe. Was she that hard up for work?

    If you do start to watch this terrible movie, you'll probably find yourself skipping ahead until you actually see something happening. Special effects looked like it was done by a few 12 years old. Avoid headaches by skipping this disaster.

    A bit puzzled how this got even 3 stars. People could give all the spoilers they could and this still would not upset many people. Is the man in the bathrobe the hero? You won't care one bit.
    1rsnowdowne

    A good example of how NOT to make a movie

    This has to be one of the worst movies I have ever seen. It does something which I thought was impossible, which was to make the Asylum movies look good.

    The story is bad. The plot holes are so big you could probably lose a planet in them. Maybe even a solar system.

    The actors all look and sound bored. As far as I can see, none of them seem to be even making any effort to act. Much of the stuff they do doesn't seem to make sense, even in the context of the movie.

    The sound is bad - most of it sounds like it was recorded in a bathroom.

    The special effects are really... special. Flying debris is represented by random black dots superimposed over the image, not connected to anything. And those are some of the better special effects. The final scene is so badly done it has to be seen to be believed.

    Several of the scenes are just totally unrelated stock footage that was spliced in, and in many cases are so jarringly out of place that I had to rewind just to make sure I had actually seen what I though I had seen.

    I understand that this was done with a low budget, but man, even with a low budget, they could at least have made an effort. The impression I get from this movie is that nobody cared enough to even try. Watch at your own peril.

    Vous aimerez aussi

    Opération chaos
    5,5
    Opération chaos
    Magnitude 10,5 : L'Apocalypse
    4,5
    Magnitude 10,5 : L'Apocalypse
    Metal Man
    1,6
    Metal Man
    Earthquake Underground
    3,2
    Earthquake Underground
    New York Volcano
    3,4
    New York Volcano
    Fake
    5,4
    Fake
    Meteor
    4,2
    Meteor
    L'enfer de glace
    3,2
    L'enfer de glace
    Captain Battle: Legacy War
    1,3
    Captain Battle: Legacy War
    The Wave
    6,6
    The Wave
    Tremblement de terre
    5,9
    Tremblement de terre
    Supercell
    4,4
    Supercell

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Connexions
      Features Solitaire (1981)

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ12

    • How long is Disaster Wars: Earthquake vs. Tsunami?Alimenté par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 13 décembre 2013 (Philippines)
    • Pays d’origine
      • États-Unis
    • Site officiel
      • Official site
    • Langue
      • Anglais
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Stormageddon: Earthquake vs Tsunami
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Los Angeles, Californie, États-Unis(main location)
    • Sociétés de production
      • Infinite Spectrum Productions
      • Tom Cat Films
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Budget
      • 185 000 $US (estimé)
    Voir les infos détaillées du box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      • 1h 25min(85 min)
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Mixage
      • Dolby Digital
    • Rapport de forme
      • 1.78 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.